St. Petersburg Times Online: News of Florida
TampaBay.com
Place an Ad Calendars Classified Forums Sports Weather
  • State grand jury suggests reversal of records law
  • Clouds gather over McKay's tax proposal
  • Rep. Sara Romeo has breast cancer surgery
  • Bush calls King one of America's finest

  • From the state wire

  • Hurricane Jeanne appears on track to hit Florida's east coast
  • Rumor mill working overtime after Florida hurricanes
  • Developments associated with Hurricanes Ivan and Jeanne
  • Four killed in Panhandle plane crash were on Ivan charity mission
  • Hurricane Frances caused estimated $4.4 billion in insured damage
  • Disabled want more handicapped-accessible voting machines
  • USF forces administrators to resign over test score changes
  • Man's death at Universal Studios ruled accidental
  • State child welfare workers in Miami fail to do background checks
  • Hurricane Jeanne heads toward southeast U.S. coast
  • Hurricane Jeanne spurs more anxiety for storm-weary Floridians
  • Mistrial declared in case where teen was target of racial "joke"
  • Panhandle utility wants sewer plant moved to higher ground
  • State employee arrested on theft, bribery charges
  • Homestead house fire kills four children, one adult
  • Pierson leader tries to cut off relief to local fern cutters
  • Florida's high court rules Terri's law unconstitutional
  • Jacksonville students punished for putting stripper pole in dorm
  • FEMA handling nearly 600,000 applications for help
  • Man who killed wife, niece, self also killed mother in 1971
  • Producer sues city over lead ball fired by Miami police
  • Tourism suffers across Florida after pummeling by hurricanes
  • Key dates in the life of Terri Schiavo
  • An excerpt from the unanimous ruling in the Schiavo case
  • Four confirmed dead after small plane crash in Panhandle
  • Correction: Disney-Cruise Line story
  • tampabay.com

    printer version

    State grand jury suggests reversal of records law

    The statewide panel comes to that conclusion after investigating identity theft. One critic calls it "catastrophic.''

    By ANITA KUMAR, Times Staff Writer
    © St. Petersburg Times
    published January 22, 2002


    TALLAHASSEE -- For more than a century, Florida law has presumed that all records are open to public scrutiny.

    If you wanted something closed, you had to get lawmakers to pass a law creating a specific exemption.

    Now, a statewide grand jury is suggesting that the law be reversed and that all records be closed unless there is a specific reason to open them.

    The change would strike at the heart of the state's national reputation for openness in government.

    "For a grand jury to recommend this, it's a major shift, a catastrophic earth-shattering shift that goes against 100 years of public policy," said Barbara Petersen, executive director of the First Amendment Foundation, a non-profit watchdog for open government in Florida.

    That recommendation was just one of the ways suggested to combat identity theft, which costs $2.5-billion nationwide each year and will skyrocket to $8-billion by 2005.

    The grand jury, which spent six months investigating, charged 33 people with identify-theft crimes and racketeering, organized fraud, grand theft and money laundering.

    "Identity theft is one of the fastest-growing crimes in the nation," Statewide Prosecutor Melanie Ann Hines said. "It is also one of the costliest for both individuals whose identities are stolen and businesses that are defrauded. Individual victims are especially hard hit because their losses include cash, credit ratings and peace of mind."

    Rep. Dan Gelber, D-Miami Beach, said the grand jury report probably will make it easier for legislators to pass bills limiting the public's access to government records and meetings this Legislative session, which begins today.

    But Gelber said they should proceed with caution.

    "Florida's Constitution demands that we carve carefully and not with a chain saw," he said. "I wouldn't want us to put the records law on its head."

    The grand jury study began months before Sept. 11, but its purpose was further emphasized by the terrorist attacks. At least 13 of the 19 terrorists involved in attacks had Florida ID cards or driving permits.

    "I think (the report) raises legitimate issues," Gelber said. "But I think that fixing the problem is a bit more complicated. It might be a bit overbroad."

    The most controversial suggestion in the report would be to reverse the open records law to keep as much personal information about Florida residents out of the public domain in the first place.

    "Private information collected from citizens should be presumed confidential and non-disclosable unless there is a statutory ground for its release," the study said. "We are not convinced doing so would violate the spirit and intent of the First Amendment."

    Other recommendations include:

    Exempting from public records personal information, including Social Security numbers, birth dates, driver's license numbers and phone numbers.

    Withholding personal information at driver's license offices unless someone specifically asks for their own information to be released.

    Administering more secure ways, including fingerprinting, to renew drivers' licenses.

    Prohibiting the financial industry from selling personal information without a customer's permission.

    Better regulating private driving schools and commercial driver's license schools.

    Having government and businesses take in less personal information. For example, health clubs and video rental stores should not require Social Security numbers on applications.

    "We do not suggest that government should withhold information that its citizens need to ensure that government carries out its role in a fair and efficient manner," the report said. "However, there is a vast difference between information documenting what the government is doing on the one hand, and private and personal information that government has collected from its citizens for a specific and limited purpose on the other."

    So far, nearly 90 bills have been proposed by legislators claiming to be fighting terrorism or identity theft.

    "Identity theft is a problem, but we don't have to offend the Constitution," Petersen said. "We should prosecute the criminal. I think we've stepped over the line."

    Back to State news
    Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111
     
    Special Links
    Lucy Morgan


    From the Times state desk