St. Petersburg Times Online: News of the Tampa Bay area
Place an Ad Calendars Classified Forums Sports Weather
  • Bill seeks clearer path to nursing
  • Suit labels Al-Arian terrorist fundraiser
  • Problem is, this home-cooked meal was illegal
  • The pucks fly in Tampa, with few major injuries
  • The stuff that makes you stuffy
  • USF may establish honors college
  • Swiftmud to back desal plant buyout
  • Bare naked ladies, and men, at beach?


    printer version

    Bare naked ladies, and men, at beach?

    Tampa Area Naturists again press their case for a part of Fort De Soto Park, but the tide appears to be against them.

    By LISA GREENE, Times Staff Writer
    © St. Petersburg Times
    published March 21, 2002

    They just want, they say, what every beachgoer wants: to enjoy the sun, the sand, the water.

    And to get a really good tan.

    Pinellas County said no in 1999, but Tampa Area Naturists are trying again: they want part of Fort De Soto Park labeled a "clothing optional" beach.

    "I've always been a sun worshiper," said Jamy Magro, a St. Petersburg lawyer who is president of the group, which is called, yes, TAN for short.

    "I enjoy that feeling of being out there, jumping in the water and being at one with nature."

    The group is set to talk to the county's park board next month. That board would recommend to commissioners whether to allow a nude beach in a less-used section of the park.

    Which most commissioners say they won't do.

    "Absolutely not. Nada. No way," said Commissioner John Morroni.

    Just last month, the commission vetoed a radio station's proposal to raise money for breast cancer by stringing bras across the Friendship Trail Bridge.

    As far as commissioners are concerned, that plan was better. At least it involved clothing.

    "The board voted down Bras Across the Bay, so I don't think we're going to vote for a nude beach," said Commissioner Ken Welch.

    TAN is trying hard. They've put together a booklet with charts, maps and color photos. (No, the photos don't show much.) They've got a catchy slogan, "nude is not lewd," to emphasize that they support sunning au naturel, not sex on the beach.

    They've estimated the dollars disrobing could bring: $750,000 to $1.5-million if there were an admission charge for the clothing optional beach. That's not counting $25-to $85-million that tourists visiting the park would spend in Pinellas per year, said Gulfport resident Dick Korf, TAN spokesman.

    Right now those tourists, especially from Europe, are more likely to visit Miami, where Haulover Beach allows nudity, Korf said. And more tourist money is especially needed since Sept. 11.

    But Commissioner Calvin Harris said he went to a European travel show on behalf of the county, and "not a single person asked if Pinellas County had a clothing optional beach."

    TAN also has survey research. Those polled supported nude sunbathing at a beach "accepted for that purpose," and were evenly split on whether government should set aside public land.

    "I just don't think our community is in favor of us using public land for a limited use," said Commissioner Karen Seel.

    Naturists are just another special interest group, Korf and Magro argue, like people who want dog parks and boat ramps.

    But why not just sunbathe nude on private land?

    "Between being nude in beautiful Fort De Soto beach and sitting around a pool in downtown Lutz," Magro replied, "where would you rather be?"

    Back to Tampa Bay area news
    Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111
    Special Links
    Mary Jo Melone
    Howard Troxler

    From the Times
    local news desks