St. Petersburg Times Online: News of southern Pinellas County
TampaBay.com
Place an Ad Calendars Classified Forums Sports Weather
tampabay.com

printer version

Local referendums

By Times staff writer
© St. Petersburg Times
published November 3, 2002


Treasure Island referendum

Voters will cast historic ballots in what is expected to be one of the largest voter turnouts in the city's 47 years. The referendum asks voters if they want the commission to pass an ordinance giving voters authority to approve any future increases in allowable height or density. Such increases, according to the referendum's language, would have to be approved by more than half of the registered voters in the city, as opposed to half the voters who cast ballots on a particular election day.

What a "yes" vote means: Technically, the referendum only asks the City Commission to pass an ordinance giving residents this power. The commission can repeal the ordinance at any point in the future, even without another referendum. But opponents of tall buildings in Treasure Island believe a referendum victory will give them political leverage to persuade commissioners to rethink how Treasure Island should develop in the future.

What a "no" vote means: If the referendum does not pass, height and density increases will continue to be in the hands of elected officials. Three of the five commissioners voted to approve new height requirements for Treasure Island two weeks ago because they feared the referendum, if it passes, would inhibit development.

North Redington Beach

Voters will decide whether to give elected officials power to raise their own salaries. Mayor and commissioner salaries are now set by town charter and require a voter referendum to change them.

Redington Shores

Voters will decide whether the town can relax its procedures for publicly bid projects. The most important change the referendum would allow is to reduce the maximum amount the Town Commission can spend without soliciting sealed bids.

Pinellas Park

Council members want residents to decide if the city should eliminate runoff elections. If passed, a charter amendment would give victories in city elections to the person who received the greatest number of votes even if the winning candidate polled less than 50 percent of the votes cast.

Back to St. Petersburg area news

Back to Top

© 2006 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111
 
Special Links
Mary Jo Melone
Howard Troxler


From the Times
South Pinellas desks
  • Residents wrangle for new stoplight
  • Great Explorations to leave Pier, reopen elsewhere
  • Controversial barn to get board scrutiny
  • Dogs mark more territory with 3 new parks
  • Loathe thy neighbor
  • Local referendums
  • Gulf Boulevard won't get third beach lane
  • Kicking back with the mayor
  • Ground broken for military center
  • Reaping benefits of choice
  • Two killed, 2 seriously injured in accidents
  • Assembly lays framework for tackling issues

  • Dr. Delay
  • Little-known left-turn sensors trigger lights
  • Gateway to health gets going in Carillon
  • Midtown property auction is disappointing
  • High-tech projector replicates heavens
  • Promoter of Open Air Post Office, 87
  • Teacher awaits ruling on school for her son
  • School program almost too good
  • Journalist polishes political crystal ball
  • Meeting set to discuss CVS influence on traffic
  • Breast begins to win over bottle at hospital
  • An uncommon woman
  • Choice plan is about as sure as a toss of the dice
  • Choice rules thwart parents of 4-year-old
  • Return to state event is fueling SPC's women

  • Letters
  • Vote 'yes,' reject tall hotels in Treasure Island

  •