St. Petersburg Times Online: News of Florida
Place an Ad Calendars Classified Forums Sports Weather
  • Family, friends bid farewell to a 'patriot and warrior'

  • Around the state
  • Lafayette sheriff again suspended after DUI arrest

  • Legislature
  • Medically Needy plan gets reprieve
  • Bright Futures, tuition break GOP's ranks
  • Even opponents oppose changes to Glades bill
  • Budget negotiations hit two more bumps
  • Budget writer bids for 2006 House speaker
  • Condos could get to vote on sprinklers
  • Crist's 'comfort' level rises on phone rate bill

  • From the state wire

  • Hurricane Jeanne appears on track to hit Florida's east coast
  • Rumor mill working overtime after Florida hurricanes
  • Developments associated with Hurricanes Ivan and Jeanne
  • Four killed in Panhandle plane crash were on Ivan charity mission
  • Hurricane Frances caused estimated $4.4 billion in insured damage
  • Disabled want more handicapped-accessible voting machines
  • USF forces administrators to resign over test score changes
  • Man's death at Universal Studios ruled accidental
  • State child welfare workers in Miami fail to do background checks
  • Hurricane Jeanne heads toward southeast U.S. coast
  • Hurricane Jeanne spurs more anxiety for storm-weary Floridians
  • Mistrial declared in case where teen was target of racial "joke"
  • Panhandle utility wants sewer plant moved to higher ground
  • State employee arrested on theft, bribery charges
  • Homestead house fire kills four children, one adult
  • Pierson leader tries to cut off relief to local fern cutters
  • Florida's high court rules Terri's law unconstitutional
  • Jacksonville students punished for putting stripper pole in dorm
  • FEMA handling nearly 600,000 applications for help
  • Man who killed wife, niece, self also killed mother in 1971
  • Producer sues city over lead ball fired by Miami police
  • Tourism suffers across Florida after pummeling by hurricanes
  • Key dates in the life of Terri Schiavo
  • An excerpt from the unanimous ruling in the Schiavo case
  • Four confirmed dead after small plane crash in Panhandle
  • Correction: Disney-Cruise Line story
    Print storySubscribe to the Times

    Even opponents oppose changes to Glades bill

    Environmental and sugar industry interests decry revisions in the Senate's bid to delay restoration.

    By CRAIG PITTMAN, Times Staff Writer
    © St. Petersburg Times
    published April 29, 2003

    TALLAHASSEE - Saying they were making changes that satisfy everyone, state senators approved a new version of a bill delaying the deadline for cleaning up Everglades pollution.

    But immediately after the 38-0 vote, lobbyists for Audubon of Florida and U.S. Sugar criticized it roundly. A spokeswoman for U.S. Rep. E. Clay Shaw, R-Fla., said it could still jeopardize federal support for the $8-billion Everglades restoration plan.

    Sen. Al Lawson, a Tallahassee Democrat who is sponsoring the measure, persuaded his colleagues to adopt three amendments he said were written by the U.S. Justice Department to satisfy concerns about the bill.

    "What we're doing is accommodating the Justice Department," Lawson said.

    But a spokesman for the Justice Department said the agency didn't write the amendments.

    "The Justice Department is not helping to write any revision amendments nor were we asked to," said spokesman Blane Rethmeier.

    The amendments actually were from the state Department of Environmental Protection, which hoped to mollify the federal government, a spokeswoman said.

    "It might have been easy for that to be miscommunicated," said DEP spokeswoman Deena Wells.

    Lawson said he had been misled. "The DEP said these are the amendments that the Justice Department wanted," he said. "I guess the DEP misrepresented them."

    Audubon lobbyist Charles Lee said some senators might not have voted for the amendments or the bill had they known the truth.

    Meanwhile DEP Secretary David Struhs has written a letter to assure officials of another federal agency, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency: "I have not, and will not, prematurely characterize EPA's position on these questions."

    Struhs was quoted in The New Republic magazine last week as saying that the EPA's regional administrator in Atlanta was "enthusiastic" about the latest version of the bill. No federal agency has taken an official position on the bill.

    That might change Friday.

    A federal judge who has overseen the cleanup for more than a decade has called an emergency hearing in Miami because he said he had been reading news reports about the proposed Everglades legislation with "considerable apprehension."

    U.S. District Judge William Hoeveler said he would not stand for any changes to the court settlement that set the stage for dramatic improvements in the Everglades' water quality.

    In 1988, the Justice Department sued Florida, charging that state officials had allowed water carrying large amounts of phosphorus to flow into the Everglades from sugar farms and suburban lawns. The pollutant wiped out native sawgrass and turned the River of Grass into a swamp of stagnant cattails.

    State officials agreed to settle the case and in 1994 the Legislature passed the Everglades Forever Act, setting a timetable for cleaning up the phosphorus. The deadline is 2006, and so far the cleanup has greatly reduced the phosphorus, though not to the level that scientists say is needed.

    A bill unveiled halfway through the session this month called for delaying the deadline 20 years and allowing a higher amount of pollution. The House bill, supported by the sugar industry, passed one committee but has been on hold ever since.

    House Speaker Johnnie Byrd, R-Plant City, said he was awaiting the Senate's vote. Now, he said, "I'll call the governor and ask him what he thinks about it, and then let the members vote it up or down."

    The Senate bill calls for delaying the deadline until 2013 and says phosphorus should be cleaned up "to the maximum extent practicable."

    While Florida is supposed to be cleaning up the phosphorus, the state also is a partner with Congress in paying half the cost of an ambitious plan to replumb the River of Grass and stop the loss of billions of gallons of water that once flowed through its sloughs.

    But Shaw and other members of Congress say the legislation could cost Florida congressional support for that project, which Gov. Jeb Bush has cited as the centerpiece of his environmental record.

    - Times staff writer Lucy Morgan and researcher Caryn Baird contributed to this report.

    Back to STATE

    Print storySubscribe to the Times


    Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111
    Special Links
    Lucy Morgan

    From the Times state desk