St. Petersburg Times
Online: Tech Times
 tampabay.com
Print storySubscribe to the Times

Track and field

Doping ban a real deal or PR ploy?

Critics say a lifetime ban for a first steroids offense is not feasible.

By Associated Press
Published December 9, 2003

LONDON - USA Track & Field's plan for lifetime bans for first-time steroid offenders will never be upheld in court, the head of the World Anti-Doping Agency said Monday.

WADA chairman Dick Pound said the new policy, adopted Sunday by USATF delegates, is a PR stunt aimed at diverting attention from criticism of the U.S. federation's anti-doping record.

"It's a pretty blatant attempt to try and grab the limelight by saying, "We're more Catholic than the pope, and we want to do this to show how tough we are,' " Pound told the Associated Press.

Pound contrasted the new policy with the USATF's refusal to explain why Jerome Young was cleared of a doping offense after testing positive for steroids in 1999. Young went on to win relay gold at the 2000 Olympics.

"At the same time they're protecting Jerome Young," Pound said, "they're talking about a lifetime ban and here they've got a guy walking around with an Olympic gold medal around his neck."

The USATF repeatedly has said it is bound by an international arbitration court ruling upholding its decision to maintain secrecy on doping acquittals.

Pound, a Canadian lawyer who frequently has criticized USATF, said life bans for a first offense can't be enforced legally and go against WADA's mandate for two-year suspensions. The USATF said the lifetime ban wouldn't take effect until questions about its legality are resolved.

While describing USATF's move as a "very promising signal," International Association of Athletics Federations general secretary Istvan Gyulai said the American body should come clean on Young.

"The world immediately says, "If you are doing this for the future, why don't you do this for the past?' " Gyulai told the AP.

Gyulai said IAAF's rules call for a "minimum" two-year ban for a first steroid offense. The IAAF tried to impose four-year bans in the 1990s but switched to two years after courts in several countries refused to accept the harsher sanction.

[Last modified December 9, 2003, 01:33:59]


Baseball

  • Anaheim near deal with Colon
  • Clearwater picks name with teeth

  • College basketball
  • Florida shrugs off second shot at top
  • A hot-shooting TCU romps

  • College football
  • UCF gives O'Leary another chance
  • BCS changes, if any, likely slight
  • Sherrill threatens NCAA with suit

  • Golf
  • Peers reward Woods for consistent season
  • Sweden's Gronberg leads 34 PGA qualifiers

  • in brief
  • U.S. athletes may hide national pride

  • NBA
  • Magic returns to win column

  • NFL
  • Around the AFC
  • Around the NFC
  • Defense gets Rams to playoffs
  • Injury to end season for Redskins' Ramsey
  • OL leads Lewis to brink of 2,000

  • NHL
  • Overtime goal moves Hull to 732, third all-time

  • Outdoors
  • Daily fishing report

  • Parimutuels
  • Early opening surprises, pleases Derby Lane fans

  • Preps
  • Largo rolls past East Lake
  • Shhhhhhh: Hicks remains Armwood's best kept secret

  • Track and field
  • Doping ban a real deal or PR ploy?
  • Rays
  • Rays prepare offer for Everett after chat
  • Bucs
  • Kicker's woes in head?
  • Lynch's stinger growing concern
  • Lightning
  • Deal with Isles would help both teams
  • Slump sticks in Richards' head
  • Tonight: Lightning at Islanders
  •  


    Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • St. Petersburg Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111