St. Petersburg Times
 tampabaycom
tampabay.com
Print storySubscribe to the Times

U.S. court upholds ban on billboards

By MAUREEN BYRNE AHERN
Published January 18, 2004

ST. PETE BEACH - The city's lone billboard won't be getting any neighbors.

A federal court has sided with St. Pete Beach against a Georgia company that wanted to strike down the city's sign regulations so it could erect billboards.

In a 17-page ruling, U.S. District Court Judge James Moody Jr. found that Granite State Outdoor Advertising Inc. is not entitled to challenge the city's sign rules or to receive attorney's fees. Moody also ruled Tuesday in favor of City Manager Mike Bonfield and Mayor Ward Friszolowski, who along with the city were defendants in the lawsuit.

"This is very good news," Bonfield said. "I'm very pleased."

Granite State had filed federal lawsuits in Tampa against Clearwater, St. Petersburg and St. Pete Beach. The suits claimed that each city's sign rules placed unconstitutional limits on free speech.

The company, which doesn't erect billboards but sells the permits that it wins after suing communities, had hoped to force the three cities to allow 19 new billboards. It wanted to erect five 65-foot signs on Blind Pass Road and on Gulf Boulevard in St. Pete Beach, where off-site signs are not permitted. The billboards also would have exceeded height and size limits.

Before filing the lawsuit against the city in 2002, Granite State had applied for billboard permits. The city denied the applications.

Last October, the 11th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals rejected Granite State's argument that St. Petersburg's sign ordinance was unconstitutional. And last month, the same court sided with Clearwater.

Granite State could appeal those decisions to the U.S. Supreme Court. And the company could ask an appellate court to review Moody's decision.

Adam Webb, an attorney for Granite State, could not be reached for comment.

Granite State has won suits in billboard cases in other Florida cities and in Georgia. The company objects to everything from how the cities regulate real estate signs to banners hung for special events. They allege that some rules illegally favor one kind of business or message over another.

"(St. Pete Beach, Clearwater and St. Petersburg) drew the line in the sand on these billboard cases," said Bill Brinton, a Jacksonville attorney who represented St. Pete Beach. "They were not intimidated by the potential negative outcome."

[Last modified January 18, 2004, 01:01:02]


Neighborhood Times headlines

  • Building will be different for City Hall
  • Construction on housing project starts
  • Downtown ferrets out evasive parking
  • Grocery chain's cutbacks won't affect Midtown site
  • Madeira takes step toward redevelopment
  • ParkSide mall to get extreme makeover
  • Townhomes okayed to replace Malo's
  • Where you live, postal address may not agree
  • Tower will help spread the word
  • A child's musical fantasy becomes melodic reality
  • Campaign for defibrillators takes hold in community
  • Paramedics lauded for lifesaving ways
  • Bush homes in on middle school reading skills
  • U.S. court upholds ban on billboards

  • Bowling
  • Galante battles through illness in national event

  • Business
  • Fame finally flows to longtime writer in genre of Harry Potter
  • Roomier for 'tummy doctors'
  • Shopping strip set for site on 4th St.

  • Dr. Delay
  • In exasperation, Starkey leg may rival Tyrone-Park

  • Religion
  • Muslims embark on profound journey

  • Running
  • Champions range in age

  • Working
  • A Day on the Job

  • Youth
  • Versatile Bodden leads UCF to new heights
  • Headlines: Boca Ciega condo-hotel is a go
  • Letters to the Editor: Senior drivers castigated unfairly
  • Click here for the Neighborhood Times Social Calendar
    Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • St. Petersburg Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111