St. Petersburg Times
Tampa Bay Lightning
Print storySubscribe to the Times

A new perspective

Down for the first time this year, the Lightning needs to rediscover its intensity and not repeat the mistakes of Game 1.

Published May 27, 2004

[Times photo: Dirk Shadd]
The Flames, who look to take a 2-0 series lead tonight, celebrate after taking a 3-0 lead during the second while Vinny Lecavalier skates away.

Game 1 photo gallery
Lightning page
Shelton: No time to scream just yet
A new perspective
Song in her heart, Hulk at her side
Win or lose, Lightning fans toot praise on streetcar service
Hottest tickets on ice
It's a passport to a dream
Fire severely damages defenseman's home
St. Louis says goals will come
Goalie keeps Flames happy
Got a minute? Pavel Kubina
Taylor blasts officiating

BRANDON - Lightning defenseman Brad Lukowich called his team's play in Game 1 of the Stanley Cup final "embarrassing" and "unacceptable."

Teammate Darryl Sydor said, "Everybody was disappointed."

And center Tim Taylor said, "We just didn't have that extra edge."

Whatever the characterization or the causes of the lopsided 4-1 loss, it doesn't change that Game 2 against the Flames tonight at the St. Pete Times Forum is gigantic.

Lose and the Flames build a two games to none lead in the best-of-seven series headed for Calgary. Win and the split is the same as in the East quarterfinals with the Islanders and final with the Flyers.

But this is new territory for Tampa Bay. For the first time this postseason, it lost a series opener, and for the first time, it is behind.

"It's something different we're experiencing now," center Brad Richards said before Wednesday's practice at the Ice Sports Forum. "We've experienced a lot of things in the playoffs, and this is something new. We might as well try to experience everything if we want to win."

Sydor said winning is tonight's only option.

"You've got to dig down deep," he said. "The next game is huge."

But what happened in Game 1?

The Lightning did not cope well with the Flames' aggressive forecheck, commited numerous turnovers and failed to capitalize on some good scoring chances. But players also acknowledged a lack of energy and intensity.

Let's see. Biggest game of their lives, worldwide TV audience, a championship on the line, no energy. Go figure.

"I don't know," Sydor said. "Everybody was disappointed in the way it happened. But we had some opportunities in the second period and battled hard in the third. We have to take a look at the positives and move forward."

One theory was the players simply let down after an emotional Game 7 victory over the Flyers.

"If that's what it takes to wake us up, we'll use it as motivation to win the next game," Richards said.

Flames center Craig Conroy said he wasn't sure if Game 1 created motivation or consternation for Tampa Bay.

"You want to get that first one, move on and give them a little doubt that maybe it's not going to be as easy as you thought, and that's what we've been able to do," he said.

Either way, Flames captain Jarome Iginla said, "We expect it to be a harder game. We've got to match their intensity and desperation."

And continue their Game 1 plan: keep their feet moving, use quickness to create turnovers and finish their checks.

It is nothing the Lightning did not see against the Flyers, who forced several mettle-testing games. The Lightning responded by winning Game 3 in Philly after a 6-2 blowout at the Times Forum and taking Game 7 at home after a staggering overtime loss in Game 6.

"We need a lot more intensity," Taylor said. "We came off a really intense Game 7 and weren't able to get back to the level we needed to play at this time of year. We have to come out and be really ready. We know the task at hand.

"It's a good challenge for our team. We seem to play better under pressure. We'll take it one game at a time, but this next game is very important for us."

A must-win?

"I don't like that "must-win,"' Lightning coach John Tortorella said. "What happens if something doesn't happen the right way for us? What do I come back to my team with? We are not going to go to Calgary because we didn't win that must-win game?

Still, he said, "You have got to figure out a response."

"By all means," Sydor said, "I know we will be ready for Game 2."

[Last modified May 27, 2004, 23:11:26]

Today's lineup

  • A new perspective
  • Fire severely damages defenseman's home
  • St. Louis says goals will come
  • Goalie keeps Flames happy
  • Got a minute? Pavel Kubina
  • Taylor blasts officiating

  • Bucs
  • Team takes introductory course

  • Rays
  • Rays ready to start another streak
  • Standridge learns value of clear head

  • Other sports

  • AL: Yanks seesaw to wild win
  • Marlins' new starter stifles Reds
  • NL: Astros rout Maddux but lose Pettitte
  • Virginia group starts stadium ticket drive

  • Colleges
  • 'Poker Face' a winner for Seminoles
  • FSU star is voted U.S. best in softball
  • Speed made Princeton grad America's best

  • Golf
  • Annika's back; all are happy
  • Haas to act his age

  • In brief
  • Smarty Jones' jockey handed a second fine

  • Motorsports
  • Gibbs Racing happy at Lowe's

  • NBA
  • Lottery win nets Magic No. 1 pick
  • Pistons hold on for series lead

  • NFL
  • Marion charged with theft and fraud

  • NHL
  • Panthers reunite Keenan, Martin

  • Outdoors
  • Daily fishing report

  • Preps
  • Branham's character survives a nightmare
  • Gulliver Prep comes out swinging
  • It all goes wrong for Jesuit
  • Patriots' Mauger returns to the mats
  • Veteran heads up Dunedin squad

  • Tennis
  • Roddick completes early exit of U.S. men
  • Raymond can't come back again
  • Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111