St. Petersburg Times

Print storySubscribe to the Times

High court considers Florida death row case

The issue: Did a lawyer's ploy of conceding guilt in hopes of mercy doom a client who refused to help in his defense?

By Associated Press
Published November 3, 2004


This time, key to presidency lies with Ohio

Martinez lead at just under 1 percent

Five judges on way to easily keeping seats
Justices' jobs appear safe, judging by early returns
Voters call it a draw in doctor-lawyer battle
Senate lead at just under 1 percent
Cantero, Bell easily hang onto seats

Coats easily beats former shock jock
Lines pose biggest problem for voters
Local roots, support boost Burke's victory
Pinellas Suncoast race close; fee hike fails
Voters approve higher tax to help Pinellas teachers, schools
Biggest voting gripe: long lines

Pasco pulls off smooth election
Kurt Browning bests Bergy
Fiorentino secures job after tough quest
Incumbent Hildebrand sails to sixth term
Jack Mariano upsets Peter Altman

Voters pack polls with vigor
Fagan leads decisively, vows to seek consensus
Nugent 'thrilled' as he heads to easy win
Precincts experience only minor problems
Pugh cruises in 1 race; recount likely in other
In Hernando: experience, Democrats

Fervor, dignity meet at polls
Spivey charges past Takac for seat on bench
2 incumbents win, another defeated by former chief

Related 10 News video:
Bush camp says he's won, Kerry not conceding
Ohio's "provisional" ballots may decide presidency
Bush defeats Kerry in Florida
Martinez claims victory, Castor refuses to concede
Voters pass minimum wage measure; gambling measure deadlocked

WASHINGTON - The Supreme Court considered on Tuesday whether a lawyer was wrong to concede a death row inmate's guilt without his consent, and many justices seemed unwilling to second-guess a trial strategy aimed at saving the man's life.

The high court appeared ready to set aside a Florida Supreme Court decision to grant a new trial to Joe Elton Nixon, convicted in the 1984 murder of a woman he met at a Tallahassee mall.

At issue is the court-appointed attorney's decision to admit at trial that Nixon was responsible for the victim's "horrible, horrible death" in hopes that his candor would persuade the jury not to impose the death penalty.

Asserting a "complete breakdown in the adversarial process," attorney Edward H. Tillinghast contended that Nixon was unfairly sentenced to death because his lawyer didn't try to prove his innocence.

Tillinghast was met with a barrage of skeptical questioning by justices wondering why they should second-guess the trial attorney, Michael Corin. Nixon had opportunities to object when his lawyer told him of the strategy but didn't, they said.

"You said his lawyer acted without consent ... but he said nothing," said Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg. "Where a client doesn't say yes and doesn't say no, mustn't a lawyer do what he thinks is best to do? Mustn't a lawyer exercise his best judgment?"

Justice Antonin Scalia agreed. "According to the lower courts, (conceding guilt) was a good strategy. I don't know why you want counsel, when a client doesn't answer, to take a course that gets him executed."

Nixon did not attend his trial; he refused to enter the courtroom. The judge held a hearing in a cell to make sure he was waiving his right to attend the trial. Nixon said he wanted another attorney and that he would disrupt the trial.

Florida prosecutors say Nixon kidnapped Jeanne Bickner, a 38-year-old state employee who was helping him start his stalled car, tied her to a tree with her jumper cables and set her on fire. Facing substantial evidence against his client, Corin tried unsuccessfully to plea-bargain for life in prison before deciding to concede the man's guilt at the trial's start.

After he was sentenced to death, Nixon said he was denied a Sixth Amendment right to counsel because his attorney had not argued his defense vigorously. Prosecutors countered that Nixon did not object to the strategy - ultimately unsuccessful - to build jury sympathy.

The case hinges on a pair of Supreme Court decisions handed down in 1984 amid justices' concerns that punishments were sometimes imposed arbitrarily due to poor attorney representation.

The rulings limit inmates' ability to claim a Sixth Amendment violation if their attorneys made a strategic choice not to pursue certain defenses. The rulings provide exceptions, however, when counsel utterly fails to challenge the prosecution with "meaningful adversarial testing."

In a 5-2 decision last year, the Florida Supreme Court ordered a new trial after finding Corin did not effectively represent Nixon, nor did the defendant agree to the lawyer's strategy.

George S. Lemieux, Florida's deputy attorney general, told justices that lawyers should be able to decide the best defense when a defendant isn't communicative.

Lemieux noted that Nixon's attorney conducted 52 depositions and investigated Nixon's life history as a part of a vigorous defense.

"He did everything he could," Lemieux said.

[Last modified November 2, 2004, 22:49:10]

Florida headlines

  • Ailing smokers ask Florida justices to restore $145 billion award
  • Bullet train issue may still be alive
  • Panhandle, president drive Martinez's win
  • Sewage spill leads to Sulphur Springs warning
  • Court hears arguments over 2006 ballot issue
  • Editorial editor retires after plagiarism inquiry
  • High court considers Florida death row case
  • Mom who poisoned 3 kids gets life sentence

  • Election 2004
  • A sigh to behold: Problems down, turnout soars
  • District 11: Mike Fasano overpowers Mattingly
  • District 15: Dockery wins another term
  • District 3: Argenziano cuts a broader swath
  • District 44: Well-financed incumbent Russell coasts past Hughes
  • District 47: After a tough GOP primary, Ambler coasts to re-election
  • District 52: Farkas vanquishes challenger
  • District 58: Henriquez takes early, strong lead in quest for a 4th term
  • District 60: Homan confident, cautious about his strong early lead
  • District 62: Republican Rich Glorioso pads his lead over rivals
  • Five appellate judges likely to retain seats
  • Five judges on way to easily keeping seats
  • Justices' jobs appear safe, judging by early returns
  • Voters call it a draw in doctor-lawyer battle
  • Castor team considers challenges
  • Senate lead at just under 1 percent
  • District 43: Incumbent Dean holds on to top political novice, retains House seat
  • District 45: Anderson wins rematch
  • District 51: Waters enjoys lopsided win
  • Cantero, Bell easily hang onto seats
  • Former Miami-Dade police director wins office
  • Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111