St. Petersburg Times

Print storySubscribe to the Times

Election 2004

Voters call it a draw in doctor-lawyer battle

Lawyers will get less for malpractice cases, but mistake-prone doctors will lose their licenses.

Published November 3, 2004


This time, key to presidency lies with Ohio

Martinez lead at just under 1 percent

Five judges on way to easily keeping seats
Justices' jobs appear safe, judging by early returns
Voters call it a draw in doctor-lawyer battle
Senate lead at just under 1 percent
Cantero, Bell easily hang onto seats

Coats easily beats former shock jock
Lines pose biggest problem for voters
Local roots, support boost Burke's victory
Pinellas Suncoast race close; fee hike fails
Voters approve higher tax to help Pinellas teachers, schools
Biggest voting gripe: long lines

Pasco pulls off smooth election
Kurt Browning bests Bergy
Fiorentino secures job after tough quest
Incumbent Hildebrand sails to sixth term
Jack Mariano upsets Peter Altman

Voters pack polls with vigor
Fagan leads decisively, vows to seek consensus
Nugent 'thrilled' as he heads to easy win
Precincts experience only minor problems
Pugh cruises in 1 race; recount likely in other
In Hernando: experience, Democrats

Fervor, dignity meet at polls
Spivey charges past Takac for seat on bench
2 incumbents win, another defeated by former chief

Related 10 News video:
Bush camp says he's won, Kerry not conceding
Ohio's "provisional" ballots may decide presidency
Bush defeats Kerry in Florida
Martinez claims victory, Castor refuses to concede
Voters pass minimum wage measure; gambling measure deadlocked

Voters handed victories to both sides Tuesday in the war between Florida doctors and lawyers, adopting a hotly contested constitutional amendment backed by Florida doctors but also endorsing two amendments pushed by lawyers and bitterly opposed by doctors.

The new amendments mean lawyers will get less money for taking on malpractice cases. But they will also have easier access to medical records. And doctors who make too many mistakes will lose their licenses.

The $27-million fight over the three amendments became the year's most expensive state campaign. Most of the money, nearly $20-million, was raised by Floridians for Patient Protection, a safety group backed by trial lawyers.

The battle over Amendment 3, whether to limit lawyers' fees, got the most attention - and drew the most money. There were TV ads bashing "greedy lawyers" and banner planes attacking "bad doctors."

"It's good for patients," said Dr. Dennis Agliano, the Tampa surgeon who is president of the Florida Medical Association. "We want them to get the bulk of the awards."

But lawyers are planning a legal challenge.

"It's such a very dangerous precedent," said Alexander Clem, president of the Academy of Florida Trial Lawyers. "Government should not engage in price-fixing. It's un-American."

Lawyers representing malpractice victims generally don't get any money up front. Instead, they take a hefty percentage, usually 30 to 40 percent, of any settlement they collect, plus legal costs. Amendment 3 would limit that to 30 percent of the first $250,000 and 10 percent of anything over that.

The limits are simply meant to help malpractice victims collect what they deserve, doctors say. But lawyers say the amendment will have less obvious effects. Malpractice cases are so complicated and expensive to prepare, they say, that many lawyers will decide there's too much financial risk to take many cases. In the end, many genuine malpractice victims won't be able to find a lawyer.

Amendment 7 gives patients broader access to records about doctors' and hospitals' medical errors. Advocates say such information would pressure hospitals to be safer and help patients choose the best doctors and hospitals. Hospitals and doctors say fear of publicity would hurt safety because doctors would be afraid to report others' mistakes.

Amendment 8 will revoke the licenses of doctors who have three or more legal judgments or official discipline actions against them. Advocates say such bad doctors shouldn't be practicing medicine. Opponents say the measure will force certain doctors who are frequently sued, such as those who deliver babies or do brain surgeries, to settle regardless of whether they did anything wrong.

[Last modified November 2, 2004, 23:34:10]

Florida headlines

  • Ailing smokers ask Florida justices to restore $145 billion award
  • Bullet train issue may still be alive
  • Panhandle, president drive Martinez's win
  • Sewage spill leads to Sulphur Springs warning
  • Court hears arguments over 2006 ballot issue
  • Editorial editor retires after plagiarism inquiry
  • High court considers Florida death row case
  • Mom who poisoned 3 kids gets life sentence

  • Election 2004
  • A sigh to behold: Problems down, turnout soars
  • District 11: Mike Fasano overpowers Mattingly
  • District 15: Dockery wins another term
  • District 3: Argenziano cuts a broader swath
  • District 44: Well-financed incumbent Russell coasts past Hughes
  • District 47: After a tough GOP primary, Ambler coasts to re-election
  • District 52: Farkas vanquishes challenger
  • District 58: Henriquez takes early, strong lead in quest for a 4th term
  • District 60: Homan confident, cautious about his strong early lead
  • District 62: Republican Rich Glorioso pads his lead over rivals
  • Five appellate judges likely to retain seats
  • Five judges on way to easily keeping seats
  • Justices' jobs appear safe, judging by early returns
  • Voters call it a draw in doctor-lawyer battle
  • Castor team considers challenges
  • Senate lead at just under 1 percent
  • District 43: Incumbent Dean holds on to top political novice, retains House seat
  • District 45: Anderson wins rematch
  • District 51: Waters enjoys lopsided win
  • Cantero, Bell easily hang onto seats
  • Former Miami-Dade police director wins office
  • Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111