St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Public art ordinance could extend citywide

Now, the requirement to incorporate art into buildings only applies to the central business district.

By JANET ZINK
Published April 7, 2005


TAMPA - City Council is scheduled to hear a report today from city administrators on the possibility of broadening Tampa's public art ordinance.

The current ordinance, passed in 1989, requires developers in the central business district to spend 0.75 percent of their project's cost on public art, up to $200,000. They can incorporate art into their building or write a check to the city for public art.

City Council member Linda Saul-Sena said she thinks the ordinance should apply citywide.

"We have such a dynamic community right now. So many projects are in play," Saul-Sena said Wednesday. "Now is the time to create as much public art as possible to make our city attractive and vibrant."

Other cities have public art ordinances that are more aggressive and flexible, said Robin Nigh, administrator for Tampa's program.

"The best public art is driven by the private citizens," Nigh said.

In Chicago, she pointed out, the public art ordinance funded pieces by Pablo Picasso, Joan Miro and Alexander Calder.

Because Tampa's ordinance applies to such a small area, the existing Public Art fund is only $50,000. Expanding the geographic boundaries for the ordinance would net much more.

"We have said we are a city of the arts. It's not a downtown of the arts," said Tampa economic development manager Mark Huey. "It's natural to ask what does a public ordinance mean in the context of a city of the arts."

Other cities also offer more flexibility for developers. Tampa's ordinance requires that public art inject artwork into the urban landscape. In Tempe, Ariz., developers can contribute to the creation or maintenance of a cultural facility, such as an art museum or performing arts center. In Miami, developers can opt to maintain existing artwork.

Nigh said she is eager to capitalize on Tampa's building boom and get a new ordinance in place.

"There's so much development going on. Tampa is in the moment," she said. "It's dripping with opportunity."

Janet Zink can be reached at 813 226-3401 or jzink@sptimes.com

[Last modified April 7, 2005, 01:22:13]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT