St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Air Force rescinds Boeing's contract

Associated Press
Published April 30, 2005


WASHINGTON - The Boeing Co. must compete again for Air Force work worth more than $3-billion to upgrade C-130 cargo planes because of a conflict of interest in the original deal, the Air Force said.

In a letter this week, Michael Dominguez, acting secretary of the Air Force, said a 2001 contract awarded to Boeing was tainted by Darleen Druyun, a former senior Air Force official who has admitted giving special treatment to the Chicago-based jetmaker.

Druyun, who later took a job at Boeing, is now serving nine months in prison for violating federal conflict-of-interest laws.

The Air Force decision follows a Feb. 24 report by the Government Accountability Office upholding a protest by three rival bidders, who had complained that the C-130 contract award was tainted by Druyun's involvement.

The companies - Lockheed Martin Corp., BAE Systems North America and L-3 Communications Corp. - are among those expected to compete for new production and installation contracts when they are reopened in 2009 or 2010.

The original award was worth $4.1-billion, and Boeing will keep an ongoing development portion worth about $1-billion, Air Force officials said. The contracts to be rebid involve production and installation of upgraded electronic instrumentation on the planes.

In an April 26 letter to the comptroller general, Dominguez said the Air Force has accepted all of the GAO's recommendations, including reimbursing the three companies for the cost of the protest and attorneys' fees.

[Last modified April 30, 2005, 00:51:14]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT