St. Petersburg Times
 tampabaycom
tampabay.com

Print storySubscribe to the Times

Health and medicine

Study: Patients live longer with bypass than with stent

By Associated Press
Published May 26, 2005

People with several clogged heart arteries fared better if they had bypass surgery rather than a less-drastic procedure in which the blood vessels are propped open with tiny mesh cylinders called stents, a study of nearly 60,000 patients found.

Those who underwent surgery were significantly more likely to survive and less likely to need repeat procedures.

However, both techniques have improved so much since the study was done that more research may be needed to determine which method works best for which patients, experts said.

The study, reported in today's New England Journal of Medicine, is among the largest to compare ways of treating clogged arteries, which can lead to a heart attack.

One solution is open-heart bypass surgery, in which blood vessels are taken from another part of the body and grafted into place to create detours around blockages.

A less drastic option is angioplasty and stenting, in which tiny mesh tubes are threaded into arteries to keep them flowing smoothly.

Angioplasty is often done in people with only one or two blockages, and many studies suggest that no harm is done if it is tried first, in an effort to avoid surgery, in people with multiple blockages. The new research now calls this into question.

Researchers looked at patients treated for multiple blockages in New York from 1997 to 2000. Surgery patients were 24 percent to 36 percent more likely than the others to be alive after three years.

Of those who received stents, 8 percent later needed surgery and 27 percent needed another stent procedure. Only about 5 percent of surgery patients needed a followup procedure.

"For people for whom there are two alternatives, bypass surgery appears to be superior," said lead researcher Edward Hannan of the State University of New York at Albany.

In an accompanying editorial, Bernard Gersh and Dr. Robert Frye of the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine in Rochester, Minn., wrote that previous studies have suggested that only diabetics did worse when given stent procedures instead of surgery.

"The implications of this study are profound and suggest that things are not as clear-cut as originally thought," they wrote.

However, stents have improved remarkably in recent years. Unlike the plain old metal stents, the new devices are drug-coated, allowing medication to drip into blood vessels to keep them from squeezing shut after procedures to remove blockages.

Bypass surgery also has improved. It has traditionally been performed by stopping the heart and putting the patient on a heart-lung machine. Now many patients have surgery in which the heart continues pumping during the operation.

[Last modified May 26, 2005, 01:18:13]


World and national headlines

  • Local murder suspect atop 25-story crane in Atlanta
  • Blocked for 4 years, Bush nominee confirmed at last
  • Official: Ballot concerns were raised before disputed vote
  • Runaway bride hit with felony charges
  • 7 teachers quit after one is fired for helping errant girl
  • Amnesty flays U.S. over Gitmo
  • Mongolia's new chief is a man of paradox
  • More charges in serial killings
  • U.S. halts bid to find bodies in N. Korea

  • Health and medicine
  • Study: Patients live longer with bypass than with stent
  • S. Korea gives stem cell scientist $1-million more

  • Iraq
  • U.S. targets Iraqi rebels in new offensive

  • Nation in brief
  • Residents flee from Colorado flooding

  • World in brief
  • Iran, Europeans have tentative nuclear deal
  • Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • Tampa Bay Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111