St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

What would LeRoy Collins do?

A Times Editorial
Published June 21, 2005


Gov. Jeb Bush has often said how much he admires one of his predecessors, LeRoy Collins, for the courage he displayed in confronting racism and the Pork Chop Gang that ruled Florida five decades ago. As he considers HB 1673, the bill to repeal the runoff primary, the governor could wisely ask himself, "What would Collins do?"

Without a runoff, acting Gov. Charley Johns, the Pork Chop Senate president, would have won the election when Collins and another progressive split the first primary vote. There were more voters in the second round than the first, proving that citizens do turn out for a runoff that obviously matters. Johns' election would have been disastrous.

The case against the runoff, which was suspended for the last two elections, is that election supervisors need eight weeks, not three or four, to prepare ballots. This is a pitiful excuse for trashing the principle of majority rule. The first primary could be advanced to July - most campaign venues are air-conditioned these days - or, much better, the law could be changed to provide for second-choice voting: an instant runoff.

A no-runoff regime would strongly tempt candidates from the extreme wings of both parties, not to mention spoilers who would run (or be put into) certain races not to elect themselves but to split someone else's constituency. The example of Ross Perot hindering President George H.W. Bush's re-election campaign comes to mind.

There was bipartisan opposition to HB 1673. It deserves to be vetoed.

[Last modified June 21, 2005, 02:30:30]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT