Print

Email story

Comment

Email editor

Clearwater beach plan challenged

A lawsuit filed by two Clearwater women says officials sidestepped city rules in approving parts of Beach Walk.

By AARON SHAROCKMAN
Published June 30, 2005

CLEARWATER - Two Clearwater residents say lawmakers skirted city rules in approving parts of the $16.2-million Beach Walk plan, keeping the public out of the loop.

A lawsuit filed by the two women seeking to halt construction states that voters needed to alter the city charter to approve the makeover of S Gulfview Boulevard into a winding, lush promenade because it gives up waterfront land to private developers.

The City Council approved the plan without a referendum.

The suit, filed in Pinellas-Pasco Circuit Court, could derail the city's grandiose plan to re-energize its main tourist roadway with plazas, fountains and elaborate walkways.

The suit could also jeopardize two planned S Gulfview resorts, which would use the public land to help build their lavish hotels, one a Hyatt.

Anne Garris and Suzanne Boschen's allegations could push back Clearwater's beach redevelopment plan by years.

"I want that Hyatt there," Boschen said. "But you have to do it legally. ... You cannot take over a public place and call it your own."

The city has been faced with legal challenges on major beach projects twice before, including by Boschen herself. In those cases, which dealt with the new Clearwater Memorial Causeway and the Clearwater Beach roundabout, the city prevailed.

Assistant City Attorney Paul Richard Hull said those decisions, which were upheld by the Florida Supreme Court, dealt with facts similar to those in the Beach Walk case.

The Beach Walk and Hyatt developments also comport with Beach by Design, the city's redevelopment plan, which is consistent with the city's land planning requirements and was adopted for public benefit, says the developer of the 250-room Hyatt, Neil Rauenhorst, president of NJR Development.

And the public access to the beach will be improved by the time the redevelopment is complete, the developer said.

Richard Fee, the attorney representing Boschen and Garris, said the situation is not that simple.

As part of the deal with the developers building the S Gulfview Hyatt, the city agreed to vacate a portion of Third Street, an east-west road between Coronado Drive and S Gulfview. Developers own the land on either side of Third Street and planned to use the vacated street to consolidate their holdings.

The city charter, however, says no right of way that "provides access to the water's edge" can be vacated for "private benefit." The city, in its response, says no road was vacated for private benefit.

Rauenhorst said Third Street is being relocated 120 feet north to the yet-to-be built Second Street.

"It's not a loss of streets; it's a relocation of streets to accommodate Beach Walk, which is the city's plan," he said.

[Last modified June 30, 2005, 15:35:00]