St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

No Child faces 1st lawsuit by state

Associated Press
Published August 23, 2005


HARTFORD, Conn. - Connecticut on Monday became the first state to challenge the No Child Left Behind law in court, arguing that the centerpiece of President Bush's education law amounts to an unfunded mandate from the federal government.

"Our message today is give up the unfunded mandates, or give us the money," said Attorney General Richard Blumenthal.

The lawsuit raises the stakes in a heated fight between states and the Bush administration over the law, and experts say legislatures around the country will be watching the case carefully. Experts expect that states could vote to join the lawsuit or file their own.

The lawsuit argues that No Child Left Behind is illegal because it requires expensive standardized tests and other school programs that the government doesn't pay for. It asks a federal judge to declare that state and local money cannot be used to meet the law's goals.

U.S. Education Secretary Margaret Spellings has repeatedly denied requests from Connecticut for more flexibility.

"Unfortunately, this lawsuit sends the wrong message to students, educators and parents," said Susan Aspey, a department spokeswoman. "The funds have been provided for testing, but Connecticut apparently wants to keep those funds without using them as intended."

The cornerstone of the law is standardized testing - something that Connecticut currently conducts in grades 4, 6 and 8. But under No Child Left Behind, the state is required to start testing children in grades 3, 5 and 7 this school year.

State education officials say that they already know that minority and poor children don't perform as well as their wealthy, white peers and that additional tests aren't going to tell them more.

In Florida, Gov. Jeb Bush has embraced the federal law and the Legislature hasn't objected.

But Florida has sought relief from some of its broader mandates. In March, Bush and Education Commissioner John Winn met with Spellings to request changes in how "adequate yearly progress" is measured.

The vast majority of Florida schools fail to meet that federal threshold for progress, even though they are considered A and B schools under Florida's grading system. That means schools that earn high marks from the state are still subject to federal sanctions, including free tutoring and student transfers.

Last week, Florida officials announced that the federal government had denied their request for a waiver for those schools. They had no comment Monday on Connecticut's decision to file suit.

Connecticut Gov. M. Jodi Rell, a Republican who for months urged the state to settle its differences through negotiation, recently joined the chorus of state teachers, superintendents, lawmakers and parents voicing support for the lawsuit.

"We in Connecticut do a lot of testing already, far more than most other states. Our taxpayers are sagging under the crushing costs of local education. What we don't need is a new laundry list of things to do - with no new money to do them," Rell said.

The federal government is providing Connecticut with $5.8-million this fiscal year to pay for the testing, Education Commissioner Betty Sternberg said. She estimates federal funds will fall $41.6-million short of paying for staffing, program development, standardized tests and other costs associated with implementing the law through 2008.

The state is not the first entity to sue in response to No Child Left Behind. The National Education Association, a national teachers union, filed a lawsuit last spring on behalf of local districts and 10 state union chapters, including Connecticut.

"It is an interesting case," said Jack Jennings, president of the Washington, D.C., Center on Education Policy. "It's interesting because a judge has to consider the fact that this is a state that's suing. It's not a school district. It's not a teachers union. It's the state of Connecticut. So that adds a lot more gravity to the lawsuit."

In Utah, the state Legislature passed a measure defying the federal law, and it was signed by Gov. Jon Huntsman on May 2. The law gives state educational standards priority over the requirements of No Child Left Behind.

--Times staff writer Melanie Ave contributed to this report.

[Last modified August 23, 2005, 02:45:30]


Share your thoughts on this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT