St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

The only entry, Wal-Mart wins Arbor Day award

The retailer earns an award for transplanting trees to man-made wetlands, even though 83 trees died in the process.

By CRAIG PITTMAN and MATTHEW WAITE
Published September 19, 2005


OLDSMAR - The National Arbor Day Foundation is set to honor Wal-Mart for transplanting trees that were in the way of building a superstore here.

The Award of Excellence, to be given today, salutes Wal-Mart for moving the trees from a 5-acre wetland destroyed by the store and its parking lot.

But records show many of the transplanted trees died in what critics say is an example of the problems with the nation's approach to protecting wetlands.

Wal-Mart says 25 of the 1,400 trees died, a 98 percent success rate. But reports Wal-Mart filed with the Southwest Florida Water Management District found at least 83 dead trees. So many transplants died in one area that three years ago the agency recommended Wal-Mart replace them with new trees.

Wal-Mart executive Don Moseley, who oversaw the Oldsmar project, called the differing claims of tree survival as "minutiae."

"I think getting lost in these little bitty numbers loses sight of the accomplishment," he said.

Transplanting the trees into man-made wetlands was crucial to Wal-Mart getting state and federal approval to build the store five years ago. The store had to offset the loss of natural wetlands by creating new ones that mimic the original.

But man-made wetlands, known as mitigation, often fail.

Sydney Bacchus, a hydrogeologist who examined the site in January with the St. Petersburg Times , scoffed at Wal-Mart's award.

"An award-winner? It depends on what for. If it's for the most absurd suggestion of mitigation, then yes, it would be an award-winner," Bacchus said.

National Arbor Day Foundation Vice President Dan Lambe said the contest judges took Wal-Mart's word for its success rate.

Lambe said his staff is "gathering all the information we can" about whether Wal-Mart should get the award but said their options are limited.

Wal-Mart was the only entry.

[Last modified September 19, 2005, 01:08:18]


Share your thoughts on this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT