St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

The man with the golden hair?

By SHARON FINK
Published October 15, 2005


James Bond
What do you think of Daniel Craig, the new James Bond
Gritty, multifaceted, new-direction Bond
Will always be confused with the villian
Blah blond Bond
Younger Bond

Is he the blah blond Bond? The gritty new-direction Bond? The Bond who will always be confused with the villain?

Or the "younger" Bond who looks older than the 52-year-old he's replacing?

After months of searching, hyping, campaigning and rumor-spreading, the quest for the next James Bond ended Friday when Englishman Daniel Craig, 37, was named the sixth actor to take on one of film's most iconic roles.

Reaction Friday to the replacement for Pierce Brosnan was fast and furious. His look, fans complained on the Internet, does not scream "Bond": It's weary, not worldly. It's that of the evildoer, not the man who saves the world. It's blond.

But Craig had many supporters, too. They like his gritty looks and noted that with film credits like Road to Perdition and Layer Cake, he can act. "The producers have gone for a younger, grittier Bond, and I think Craig will make an excellent 007," David Black, chairman of the James Bond International Fan Club, told the BBC.

[Last modified October 15, 2005, 01:16:10]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT