St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

U.S. Supreme Court

Alito hearings won't begin until 2006, Senate leaders say

Associated Press
Published November 4, 2005


WASHINGTON - The Senate will begin hearings Jan. 9 on Judge Samuel Alito's appointment to the Supreme Court, leaders of the Judiciary Committee said Thursday in a bipartisan decision not to heed President Bush's call for a final confirmation vote before year's end.

"It simply wasn't possible to accommodate the schedule that the White House wanted," said Sen. Arlen Specter, R-Pa., chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee.

He outlined a timetable that would include five days of hearings, followed by a vote in committee on Jan. 17 and the full Senate on Jan. 20.

"It's far more important to do it right than fast," said Vermont Sen. Patrick Leahy, the senior Democrat on the panel. "In this case, I suspect we're doing both."

White House spokeswoman Dana Perino, who is traveling with President Bush in Argentina, said Thursday:

"We had hoped the hearings would be finished by the end of the year. However we have tremendous confidence in Sen. Specter who handled Chief Justice Roberts' confirmation process so well. We are encouraged by the bipartisan momentum that has set the vote on the Senate floor for Jan. 20.'

There was no evidence that the scheduling decision signaled any dissatisfaction with the nomination on the part of Republicans.

"I think Judge Alito has made a very good first impression," Specter said.

Bush nominated Alito on Monday to fill the seat of Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who has often held the swing vote on cases involving controversial issues such as abortion and affirmative action.

Already, some Democrats have raised the possibility of a filibuster - an attempt to prevent final action on the nomination - and Leahy stopped short of committing to a vote in the full Senate on Jan. 20.

Specter said that "lurking below the surface is a concern for a filibuster" and said pushing the start of hearings to January "takes away a principal argument for those who would say the Senate is rushing."

The Pennsylvania Republican announced the date for hearings as Alito, a judge on the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals, courted support from senators, using a room off the Senate floor as an impromptu office while lawmakers rotated through.

Most Republicans have supported Alito's nomination, and in making the appointment the president urged the Senate to vote this year.

Democrats, saying they wanted to review the voluminous record that Alito has compiled in 15 years as a judge, said they wanted to wait until the new year to start the hearings.

Since Monday, Alito has met with more than a dozen senators in courtesy calls, a time-honored process that involves having the nominee walk from one office to another.

[Last modified November 4, 2005, 01:42:07]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT