St. Petersburg Times
 tampabaycom
tampabay.com

Print storySubscribe to the Times
 

Giving away assets has benefits, hazards

By HELEN HUNTLEY, Times Personal Finance Editor
Published December 4, 2005

The new Medicare drug benefit includes subsidies that could be worth several thousand dollars a year to people with low incomes and few assets. As a result, it raises an intriguing question:

Should I give money away if my income is low enough but my assets aren't?

About 2.4-million people will be in that situation, according to the Kaiser Family Foundation.

Asset limits vary with the three levels of subsidies, but the most allowed to qualify for any subsidy is $11,500 for an individual and $23,000 for a couple. About two-thirds of Medicare recipients have more than that, which is no surprise since many seniors have been lifelong savers.

In counting assets, Medicare is primarily interested in assets that could be converted easily to cash, such as bank accounts, stocks, bonds, mutual funds and retirement accounts, plus real estate other than a primary residence. A home, a burial plot and personal property such as cars and jewelry are specifically excluded.

That means if your income is low enough, you could qualify for the drug benefit by giving your countable assets to your children or to other relatives or friends. You don't even have to be subtle about it since the Medicare rules have no prohibition against impoverishing yourself in order to qualify.

However, giving money away to get the drug benefit could backfire if you later need nursing home care. The gifts might make you ineligible for Medicaid, which pays nursing home bills for those who qualify.

The problem is that Medicaid has a "look-back period," which penalizes applicants for any gifts made in the three years before application (five years if you are using a trust.) Eligibility for Medicaid is then delayed based on the amount you have given away.

"It seems to me that if people had to transfer $100,000 in order to benefit on Medicare Part D, it probably is not a really smart thing to do," said Clearwater lawyer Charles Robinson, who specializes in elder law. "If they had $30,000 and were maybe $10,000 over the threshold, that's something they might want to think about."

Giving money away has other hazards unrelated to government subsidies. If you are giving money away expecting the person to give it back or spend it on you when you need it, you could be disappointed. Money given to anyone else is legally theirs, and there is no guarantee they will spend it on your behalf. Once in someone else's name, it also becomes vulnerable to claims from that person's creditors.

[Last modified December 3, 2005, 16:56:52]


World and national headlines

  • The culture: Turkish. The address: German.
  • Al-Qaida's No. 5 killed in blast
  • World finance leaders press China on yuan
  • Miss. man convicted of killing 3 relatives
  • Blast can't drop S.D.'s very tallest building
  • Dental records confirm bodies are missing N.H. kids
  • Toxic spill worst for native people
  • Early Christmas card sells at auction
  • Early Christmas card sells at auction
  • Tax promises mark campaign
  • University cancels creationism 'mythology' class after e-mail
  • Dogs out, bomb-sniffing wasps in?
  • As workers go west, EU members worry
  • Thirsty Mideast is eyeing its sewers

  • Medicare
  • 'Medicare Advantage' offers more choices
  • A road map for Part D
  • Contacting Medicare - a few tips
  • Decisions, Decisions
  • Giving away assets has benefits, hazards
  • Help by phone and the Web
  • More help - for some
  • Profiles
  • There's more to a plan than the price
  • There's more to a plan than the price
  • Drug plan won't cure all ills
  • New drug benefit affects everyone
  • Medicare Part D and you
  • Tell us your experience
  • Because of Part D, free drug programs scale back
  • Medicare Advantage plans
  • Back to Top

    © 2006 • All Rights Reserved • St. Petersburg Times
    490 First Avenue South • St. Petersburg, FL 33701 • 727-893-8111