St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

U.S. Supreme Court

Alito gets highest rating from bar association

Associated Press
Published January 5, 2006


WASHINGTON - Judge Samuel Alito on Wednesday gained the American Bar Association's highest rating for a Supreme Court nominee, giving him a boost before next week's Senate confirmation hearings.

Interest groups now will try to help or hinder Alito's chances by spending hundreds of thousands of dollars on television, radio and Internet ads nationwide and in the states of key senators, before and during the Senate Judiciary Committee's hearings.

This is the second time the ABA, the nation's largest lawyers' organization, has rated Alito, who was nominated by President Bush on Oct. 31 as the replacement for retiring Justice Sandra Day O'Connor.

The "well qualified" rating - the highest - is the same one Alito earned in 1990 when former President George Bush nominated him to the 3rd U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals.

White House spokesman Scott McClellan said, "Leading Senate Democrats have said in the past that the ABA is the - quote - gold standard for evaluating judicial nominees."

Democrats, the Senate's minority party, say Alito is too conservative and could undermine abortion rights.

"The ABA ratings do not take into account whether a judge's judicial philosophy and views are in or out of the broad mainstream," said Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y. "That is the $64,000 question with Judge Alito and we will have to wait for the hearings to get a better answer."

For more than 50 years, the ABA has evaluated judicial nominees' credentials, though the organization has no official standing in the process. In 2001, Bush ended the ABA's preferential role in vetting prospective nominees and refused to give the group advance word on names under consideration.

[Last modified January 5, 2006, 01:19:08]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT