St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Test slips radioactive material past customs agents

Associated Press
Published March 28, 2006


WASHINGTON - Undercover investigators slipped radioactive material - enough to make two small "dirty bombs" - across U.S. borders in Texas and Washington state last year in a test of security at American points of entry.

Radiation alarms at the unidentified sites detected the small amounts of cesium-137, a nuclear material used in industrial gauges. But customs agents permitted the investigators to enter the United States because they were tricked with counterfeit documents.

The Bush administration said Monday that within 45 days it will give U.S. Customs and Border Protection agents the tools they need to verify such documents.

The Government Accountability Office's report, the subject of a Senate hearing today, said detection equipment used to screen people, vehicles and cargo for radioactive substances appeared to work.

But the investigation, carried out simultaneously at both border crossings in December, also identified security holes terrorists might be able to exploit to sneak nuclear materials into the United States.

"This operation demonstrated that the Nuclear Regulatory Commission is stuck in a pre-9/11 mind-set in a post-9/11 world and must modernize its procedures," Sen. Norm Coleman, R-Minn., said Monday.

The Nuclear Regulatory Commission, in charge of overseeing nuclear reactor and nuclear substance safety, challenged that notion. "Security has been of prime importance for us on the materials front and the power plant front since 9/11," agency spokesman David McIntyre said.

The head of the Homeland Security Department's Domestic Nuclear Detection Office, Vayl Oxford, said the substance could have been used in a radiological weapon with limited effects.

A Senate homeland security subcommittee, which Coleman leads, released details of the investigation and two GAO reports on radiation detectors and port security before hearings this week.

The GAO, the investigative arm of Congress, also found that installation of radiation detectors is taking too long and costing more than expected. It said the Homeland Security Department's goal of installing 3,034 detectors by September 2009 across the United States - at border crossings, seaports, airports and mail facilities - was "unlikely" to be met and said the government probably will spend $342-million more than it expects.

Between October 2000 and October 2005, it said, the government spent about $286-million installing radiation monitors.

To test security at the Mexican and Canadian borders, GAO investigators represented themselves as employees of a fake company. When stopped, they presented counterfeit documents saying they could receive, acquire, possess and transfer radioactive substances.

Investigators found that customs agents weren't able to check whether a person caught with radioactive material was permitted to possess the materials under a government-issued license.

"Unless nuclear smugglers in possession of faked license documents raised suspicions in some other way, CBP officers could follow agency guidelines yet unwittingly allow them to enter the country with their illegal nuclear cargo," a report said. It described this problem as a significant gap in safety procedures.

Jayson Ahern, the assistant customs commissioner for field operations, said a system for agents to confirm the authenticity of government licenses will be in place within 45 days. He noted the radiation detectors had sounded alarms.

"We're pleased when a test like this is able to demonstrate the efficacy of our technology," Ahern said.

False radiation alarms are common - sometimes occurring more than 100 times a day - although the GAO said inspectors generally do a good job distinguishing nuisance alarms from actual ones. False alarms can be caused by ceramics, fertilizers, bananas and even patients who have recently undergone some medical procedures.

At one port - which investigators did not identify - a director frustrated over false alarms was worried that backed-up trains might block the entrance to a nearby military base until an alarm was checked out.

The director's solution: turn off the radiation detector.

[Last modified March 28, 2006, 03:01:29]


Share your thoughts on this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT