St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Supreme Court reinstates lawsuit against payday-advance companies

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published April 28, 2006


TALLAHASSEE - Payday advances made by check-cashing companies before a state law was passed to regulate them in 2001 were illegal loans, the Florida Supreme Court ruled while reinstating a consumer lawsuit Thursday.

The case involved businesses that, for a fee, advance cash in exchange for checks they do not take to the bank until later, which is known as a deferred presentment transaction.

The fees amounted to interest rates far in excess of the 18 percent legal limit and 45 percent level for criminal usury, said Christopher Casper, a Tampa lawyer who has filed several lawsuits on hold pending the Supreme Court ruling.

The advances are known as payday loans because they are designed to tide workers over until they get their paychecks, but many customers are retirees waiting for Social Security checks. For that reason, the AARP Foundation filed a friend-of-the-court brief.

[Last modified April 28, 2006, 01:15:08]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT