St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Bill would outlaw 'parking' Pentagon funds

By PAUL DE LA GARZA
Published May 5, 2006


TAMPA - In response to an investigation at Special Operations Command, U.S. Sen. Bill Nelson introduced legislation Thursday that would make it illegal for the Pentagon to fund projects without congressional approval.

In a report released Monday, investigators cleared SOCom of allegations that it hid $20-million from Congress in the 2003 budget at the direction of the Pentagon comptroller. The investigation was prompted by an anonymous tip that included an e-mail from then-SOCom comptroller Elaine Kingston to staff.

In the e-mail, dated Feb. 11, 2002, Kingston said she had received a call from the Pentagon comptroller asking if she could "park" $40-million in SOCom accounts at MacDill Air Force Base.

Kingston wrote that the Pentagon needed an answer in five minutes because the agency where the money was could not do it.

Kingston coached colleagues on how to account for the additional money and avoid attracting attention to it in congressional briefings.

The audit division of the inspector general found that the Pentagon merely was asking SOCom if it could use a budget boost. A separate criminal inquiry also cleared SOCom.

Nelson, the Florida Democrat who sits on the Armed Services Committee, thinks the Pentagon hid money from Congress and set up a "slush fund."

He introduced legislation that would prohibit the Pentagon "from directing the allocation of funds in the President's budget ... with the knowledge or intent that the funds would not be used for which they are allocated."

[Last modified May 5, 2006, 02:30:26]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT