St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message

Top general expected to replace Goss as CIA chief

Michael Hayden would take over the agency during a time of transition.

Published May 7, 2006

WASHINGTON - With Gen. Michael Hayden's expected nomination to run the CIA, a military officer would be in charge of every major spy agency.

The question is: Would the often headstrong CIA salute as he presses ahead with reforms?

Government officials all the way up to President Bush have called this a time of transition at the CIA.

Its director, Porter Goss, announced his resignation Friday, as the CIA and the 15 other U.S. spy agencies still adjust to life in an era of intelligence overhauls ordered by Congress. A December 2004 law was the most sweeping redesign of U.S. intelligence since 1947.

Enter Hayden, National Intelligence Director John Negroponte's top deputy and former National Security Agency chief who is considered the front-runner to succeed Goss.

The White House on Saturday said there was a "collective agreement" that the CIA needed a new leader now. A presidential spokeswoman, Dana Perino, said Goss played an important role in the fight against terrorism and "helped transform the agency to meet the challenging times we're living in."

She added, "Reports that the president had lost confidence in Porter Goss are categorically untrue."

If Hayden were to get the nomination, military officers would run the major spy agencies, from the ultra-secret NSA to the Defense Intelligence Agency.

The next CIA chief must deal with low morale at the agency; uncertainties in the intelligence about hot spots such as Iran and North Korea; an uncontrolled insurgency in Iraq; and the pursuit of Osama bin Laden and other al-Qaida leaders.

Hayden's potential impact at the CIA is difficult for many to predict because the agency's mission in Iran, Iraq and elsewhere is hardly transparent.

John Pike, director of the think tank, said U.S. foreign policy has become a military policy - a trend that began a decade ago.

With a general at the CIA's helm, "it would represent the culmination of the militarization of the agency that has been under way for some time," Pike said Saturday. "We are at war."

Among other pressure points, the incoming director will have to help sort out how the National Clandestine Service fits in with the CIA and other intelligence agencies. This organization, created in the intelligence overhaul, is made up largely of the CIA's most secret operatives.

Goss' successor also will have to decide where the CIA's analysts will serve best: at the agency or new specialty centers, such as the National Counterterrorism Center.

The CIA wants to retain its most experienced staff and its pre-eminence, having once sat atop the spy pyramid because its director coordinated all U.S. intelligence.

When the national intelligence director's office was opened last year, the CIA was relegated to a lesser position.

Hayden would have to adapt to the CIA's culture, which is considered more rambunctious than the military's hierarchy. That could mean that as changes are made, CIA staff may not be as quick to salute as would those at the NSA, which is part of the Pentagon.

Many military officials who join the CIA find they adapt to it.

For instance, the CIA's deputy director, Navy Vice Adm. Albert Calland, traded in his uniform for a suit and is known to most at the CIA simply as "Bert."

Retired Navy Adm. William O. Studeman - who has been CIA deputy director and CIA acting director - said the transition from the military to the CIA is not difficult for an intelligence professional.

"On the other hand, it takes some getting used to the CIA culture and mission," he said. And, he said, "some of the missions have changed under intelligence reform."

The CIA was created after World War II to provide a civilian intelligence organization, in part after the military failed to predict the attack on Pearl Harbor.

Out of concern about military control of the CIA, Congress wrote into law that the CIA director and his deputy cannot both be military officers. So if Hayden were to land the job (he is expected to be confirmed if nominated), he would have to retire from active duty or Calland would have to look for a new position.

Some intelligence officials say civilians are essential to a spy apparatus because they are not wedded to organizational charts and processes.

That is most important with good old-fashioned spying. For years, that was the CIA's bread-and-butter and the type of intelligence that the United States most needs in the fight against terrorism. The agency tries to attract independent thinkers who can analyze information and make decisions in far-flung locations, with less reporting back to Washington than is found in the military.

[Last modified May 7, 2006, 07:11:27]

Share your thoughts on this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters