St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Film

Something evil this way returns

By STEVE PERSALL
Published June 8, 2006


Thirty years ago, The Omen was the best of the post-Exorcist movies that involved creepy children under demonic influence. Director John Moore (Behind Enemy Lines) wisely sticks close to the source material for the R-rated remake that opened nationwide Tuesday, earning a fair share of goosebumps along the way.

The story involves U.S. ambassador Robert Thorn (Liev Scheiber, stepping into Gregory Peck's shoes), who realizes that the boy named Damien (Seamus Davey-Fitzpatrick) being raised as his son is the Antichrist. That is what Robert gets for pulling one of those baby swap deals when his biological son died at birth. His wife, Katherine (Julia Stiles, not making anyone forget Lee Remick), is certain the little devil wants to kill her.

The new version doesn't tinker much with the original script; David Seltzer wrote both movies, a continuity of vision that is rare among remakes. Moore has no problem raising the violence quotient to modern standards while maintaining a signature scene from the 1976 version, as well as adding a sick-humor wrinkle to the fate of a nosy photojournalist (David Thewlis).

What is wrong with the remake? Chiefly that Davey-Fitzpatrick comes across as a pouting kid rather than Satan's spawn, and Stiles is too lightweight as a screen presence to transfer Katherine's fear to the audience. The Omen relies too often on sudden noises and flashy editing for scares, rather than the slow dread established by the original. However, Moore's version works better overall than you might expect. B

- STEVE PERSALL, Times film critic

[Last modified June 7, 2006, 10:22:01]


Share your thoughts on this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT