Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Manatees' status change puts them in more peril
By PATRICK ROSE
Published June 14, 2006
Despite growing threats to the manatee's long-term survival and overwhelming public opposition, the Florida Fish and Wildlife Commission (FWC) voted last week to prematurely down-list manatees from ''endangered'' to ''threatened.'' This decision plays right into the hands of those who want to exploit manatee habitat for development and high-speed recreation. Even though the state found that the manatee population could be reduced by as much as 50 percent in the future and that manatees meet the federal and World Conservation Union's (IUCN) definition for ''endangered,'' manatees no longer qualify for state endangered status because the FWC arbitrarily changed its listing and delisting rules by adopting the IUCN criteria for ''endangered'' and then calling it ''threatened.'' Thirty conservation and animal welfare organizations representing millions of Americans across the nation urged the FWC to fix its imperiled species classification system to properly align it with the IUCN's. Thirty-nine manatee and dugong scientists from numerous countries around the world sent a letter in opposition to the manatee's down listing. And people from all over the nation called the agency in protest, while hundreds more attended the FWC meeting. Out of scores of speakers at this meeting, only a handful of developers', marine industries' and go-fast boaters' lobbyists spoke out in favor of down-listing manatees to threatened! Further, 17 organizations, filed a legal petition asking the FWC to fix its imperiled species classification system. But in the end, none of it mattered to the commissioners. The FWC insists protections won't change, but a review of Florida law shows endangered species are afforded more protection than threatened species. The commission claims its management plan will protect manatees. However, Florida's Legislature will be pressured to reduce the FWC's authority and funding to protect manatees. This will undermine the implementation of the plan, and prevent real recovery. The FWC and Gov. Jeb Bush are declaring this a victory for manatees, but the facts show otherwise. The agency claims that the manatee population is growing, yet a state report shows that only the two smallest subpopulations clearly show growth. Together, these two subpopulations account for only 16 percent of the manatee population. The largest subpopulation on the Atlantic coast shows a probable decline of about 3 percent per year over the past five years. The Southwest subpopulation is already in decline. Manatees continue to die from boat strikes in near-record numbers, and there has been a 17 percent increase in manatee mortality from boat collisions over the last five years, as compared with the previous five-year period. Please ask yourself: Can all of the organizations representing hundreds of thousands of Florida citizens and millions more people nationwide who have shared their concerns over the new listing process be wrong? I urge the FWC to take a step back from the situation and think about the repercussions to manatees and many other imperiled species if we are right and they are wrong. The consequences will be disastrous. If we are wrong and they are right, then no harm will have been done. In the meantime, manatees' projected loss of winter habitat could cause catastrophic future losses. This is no time for celebration. Patrick Rose is the director of government relations for Save the Manatee Club. Guest columnists write their own views on subjects they choose, which do not necessarily reflect those of this newspaper.
[Last modified June 14, 2006, 00:29:27]
Share your thoughts on this story
|