Splitting CEO and chairman roles promotes accountability
By RACHEL BECK
Published June 21, 2006
NEW YORK - Some of the biggest and best-known corporations in America are resisting shareholder pressure to improve checks and balances at the top by splitting the roles of their chairman and CEO.
Both Cisco Systems Inc. and Goldman Sachs Group Inc. recently had the chance to set an example when they announced top-level management changes.
Instead, each chose a single person to fill both positions.
That's disappointing. When companies of that stature choose the status quo, it doesn't help improve governance practices anywhere else.
Following the business scandals of the past, shareholder activists have argued convincingly that having an independent chairman leading the board should make corporate malfeasance more difficult. Their logic: Increasing the power of the chairman and directors raises accountability throughout organizations and positions them to better rein in CEOs and other top executives.
Already, there are some signs of progress. About 32 percent of companies in the Standard & Poor's 500 index now have split positions, up from the 22 percent that did so three years ago, according to the Corporate Library's Board Analyst database.
Still, only 7 percent of companies have a fully independent chairman, according to the proxy advisory firm Institutional Shareholder Services Inc.
That doesn't just mean bumping up the CEO to chairman as retirement nears, but bringing in someone from the outside with no previous link to the company.
Plenty of work still needs to be done to make this a more widespread trend.
Cisco isn't leading by example. Even though the network equipment maker had split those roles before, it announced this month that its longtime CEO John T. Chambers would take on the duties of chairman when John P. Morgridge steps down in November.
Chambers became CEO of Cisco, one of the largest U.S. technology companies, in 1995, and since then, the company's annual sales have jumped from $1.2-billion to nearly $25-billion in 2005. But the company's stock today trades around $20 a share, down nearly 75 percent from its tech-bubble high in 2000.
Goldman Sachs has seen similar growth, with revenues in 2005 at nearly $25-billion - more than three times what it was in 1997 - fueled by big gains in both its investment banking and trading operations. Goldman is the nation's largest securities firm by market value.
Lloyd Blankfein is taking over as chairman and CEO from Henry Paulson, whom President Bush has nominated to be the next U.S. Treasury secretary. Blankfein has been president and chief operating officer at the investment bank since January 2004 and a director since April 2003. On Monday, Goldman announced two company insiders - one heading the firm's investment banking and one in charge of trading - would replace Blankfein as co-presidents and co-COOs.
But even though both Chambers and Blankfein are surely qualified to lead these corporate giants, that's not the point. An independent chairman would allow each CEO to focus on running the business, without being burdened by such tasks as managing the board, navigating complex governance issues or dealing with regulatory concerns.
That might not seem so important in good times, but should performance wane or allegations of wrongdoing turn up, a focused CEO and independent chairman could together help steer a company back to health a whole lot faster.
Rachel Beck is the national business columnist for the Associated Press. Write to her at firstname.lastname@example.org.
[Last modified June 21, 2006, 06:26:41]
[an error occurred while processing this directive]