St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Armitage admission stirs new leak case questions

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published September 9, 2006


WASHINGTON - For three years, Special Prosecutor Patrick Fitzgerald knew the answer to one of the biggest questions in Washington: Who leaked the identity of CIA operative Valerie Plame?

Now that former Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage acknowledged this week that he was the leaker, the new question is what Fitzgerald has been looking for during a quest that rattled the White House and sent a reporter to jail.

"What was the rationale for seeking an answer to a question he already knew the answer to?" said Wayne Berman, a former assistant secretary of commerce and a supporter of the only person indicted in connection with the leak case, former White House aide I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby.

Fitzgerald's office had no response to that question Friday.

Armitage said he inadvertently revealed Plame's job to syndicated columnist Robert Novak in July 2003. That revelation came as Plame's husband, Joseph Wilson, criticized the Bush administration's prewar intelligence on Iraq.

Novak's column touched off claims that the White House was behind a smear campaign, which led to a federal investigation into the leak and whether it was part of a partisan effort to undermine Wilson's credibility.

However, early in the inquiry, Armitage told authorities he was Novak's source. Armitage said Fitzgerald asked him to not to say that publicly. Fitzgerald then pressed on with the investigation, questioning White House aides. Among them was top Bush adviser Karl Rove, who appeared five times before a grand jury before being cleared of wrongdoing this summer.

When Libby was indicted in October 2005 on charges of obstruction of justice, perjury and lying to investigators, Fitzgerald said Libby was the first official to discuss Plame in a conversation with New York Times reporter Judith Miller.

That's where this week's admission by Armitage muddles the case. After the indictment, he told authorities he had made a passing comment about Wilson's wife to Washington Post reporter Bob Woodward days before Libby's conversation with Miller. Armitage said he had forgotten about the conversation.

Libby and Rove also said they forgot details about their conversations with reporters, but only Libby was charged.

Lucy Dalglish, executive director of the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press, said Friday she believes Fitzgerald knew no crime had been committed with the leak of Plame's identity, yet he forced reporters to disclose their confidential sources and even sent Miller to jail.

"After a while, he didn't care who the source was," Dalglish said. "They just wanted to get somebody on obstruction."

Attorney Melanie Sloan, who represents the Wilsons in a lawsuit claiming Libby, Vice President Dick Cheney and others conspired to leak Plame's identity, said the investigation was necessary.

Fitzgerald knew Armitage's leak started the scandal, Sloan said, but he didn't know who else leaked information to the press. That's what the three-year investigation has been about, she said.

Berman, the Libby supporter, sees things differently. He said Armitage's admission contradicts the conspiracy theory and raises questions about why Libby was ever charged.

"Scooter was singled out, for whatever reason, by a prosecutor who appears to have made different decisions about people who had similar circumstances," Berman said.

[Last modified September 9, 2006, 01:26:24]


Share your thoughts on this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT