St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Kerkorian has next move on GM

The investor pushed for an alliance with Renault and Nissan and failed. What he will do next is unclear.

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published October 6, 2006


WASHINGTON - Billionaire investor Kirk Kerkorian has a decision to make now that General Motors Corp. has decided against pursuing a three-continent alliance that he had sought.

Should he continue his attempt to buy additional shares in the company, seek a proxy fight to take control of GM's board of directors or simply sit back as GM pursues its turnaround plan?

Some analysts said Thursday they expect Kerkorian, 89, to keep the pressure on GM chairman and chief executive Rick Wagoner as he works through a multiyear plan to make the world's No. 1 automaker profitable again after losing $10.6-billion last year.

"I would be surprised if (Kerkorian) took his money and went home," said Kevin Tynan, an automotive analyst with New York-based Argus Research. "He is an activist, and I think he would be somewhat unfulfilled if he doesn't elicit some sort of change in this company."

Tracinda Corp., Kerkorian's investment company and the owner of 9.9 percent of GM, said Wednesday it was disappointed by the automaker's decision to halt talks with Renault SA and Nissan Motor Co., a courtship that the former movie mogul set in motion last spring.

An alliance would have "enabled GM to realize substantial synergies and cost savings," and Tracinda said it regretted "the board did not obtain its own independent evaluation of the alliance." Tracinda spokeswoman Carrie Bloom declined to comment Thursday.

The decision by GM's board to scrap the talks was unanimous, meaning it included the support of board member Jerome York, a Tracinda adviser. Kevin Reale, research director for Boston-based AMR Research, said that indicated "Kerkorian is presenting some level of confidence in Rick Wagoner and his team to be able to drive the turnaround plan."

Kerkorian, who unsuccessfully tried to take over Chrysler in 1995, said last month he was interested in buying up to 12-million more shares of GM. The move would bring Tracinda's ownership to 12 percent, but it would need regulatory approval because GM owns banking and insurance interests.

Tynan said Kerkorian was less likely now to go through with those plans, especially with the company's stock trading near its 52-week high of $34. It closed Thursday at $33.13, down 19 cents.

Morgan Stanley analyst Jonathan Steinmetz said in a note to investors that Kerkorian and York "face a fork in the road." He said they could stand pat and monitor GM's turnaround, sell the shares or attempt to increase their position within the company.

One way of increasing its position would be through a proxy fight against GM's management or an attempt to develop more support among shareholders. But the move would carry some pitfalls.

Such an attempt to reach GM's vast shareholders would likely cost between $30-million to $50-million, said Peter Henning, a former attorney with the Securities and Exchange Commission who teaches at Wayne State University Law School. The automaker also would be able to use its own resources to defend against a proxy fight, he said.

Kerkorian launched a $23-billion hostile takeover bid for Chrysler in 1995, saying the company was underperforming. He gave up the drive the following year in exchange for a seat on its board, but his actions served as a catalyst for the merger of Chrysler Corp. and Daimler-Benz AG.

Kerkorian later sued DaimlerChrysler AG - unsuccessfully - after the 1998 merger, saying the deal cost him millions because it wasn't a true merger of equals.

[Last modified October 5, 2006, 22:57:41]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT