St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
Multimedia report
  • Owning vs. renting
    The end of the real estate boom has led to a community mix that some owner-occupants say they didn't bargain for. See detailed, clickable maps with data for your neighborhood.
  • More multimedia reports
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

News

We sentenced Japanese for this

By ROBYN BLUMNER
Published October 22, 2006


ADVERTISEMENT

Flanked by the panjandrums of shame and the dirty hands gang, including the current attorney general and the vice president, President Bush on Tuesday signed into law the Military Commissions Act, a law that will go down in history as an obscenity against liberty and decency.

No presidential signing statement accompanies this bill. Bush got the despotic powers he wanted, or as White House spokesman Tony Snow explained it: "They did a really good job this time," meaning that you don't have to confiscate power by rewriting a law when Congress hands it to you.

In touting the measure, Bush declared that the "CIA program" would now be allowed to continue and interrogators could return to performing "their duties to the fullest extent of the law." He presumably means that the CIA will once again be free to use reported techniques such as water-boarding - in which a prisoner is made to feel like he's drowning - or forcing shackled prisoners to stand in one place for 40 hours or more, or exposing naked prisoners to 50-degree temperatures and drenching them with cold water.

Bush was strident in asserting that the CIA chamber of horrors or "program" could be open for business again. But at the same time, the president gravely assured us: "The United States does not torture."

Interestingly, we weren't nearly as blithe about waterboarding when it happened to our own guys during World War II. Then, we considered it a war crime and a form of torture.

In "Drop by Drop: Forgetting the History of Water Torture in U.S. Courts," Judge Evan Wallach of the U.S. Court of International Trade has documented the trials in which the United States used evidence of water-boarding as a basis for prosecutions. The article, still in draft form, will be published soon by the Columbia Journal of Transnational Law.

Among the numerous examples, Wallach cites one involving four Japanese defendants who were tried before a U.S. military commission at Yokohama, Japan, in 1947 for their treatment of American and Allied prisoners. Wallach writes, in the case of United States of America vs. Hideji Nakamura, Yukio Asano, Seitara Hata and Takeo Kita, "water torture was among the acts alleged in the specifications ... and it loomed large in the evidence presented against them."

Hata, the camp doctor, was charged with war crimes stemming from the brutal mistreatment and torture of Morris Killough "by beating and kicking him (and) by fastening him on a stretcher and pouring water up his nostrils." Other American prisoners, including Thomas Armitage, received similar treatment, according to the allegations.

Armitage described his ordeal: "They would lash me to a stretcher then prop me up against a table with my head down. They would then pour about 2 gallons of water from a pitcher into my nose and mouth until I lost consciousness."

Hata was sentenced to 25 years at hard labor, and the other defendants were convicted and given long stints at hard labor as well.

Wallach also found a 1983 case out of San Jacinto County, Texas, in which James Parker, the county sheriff, and three deputies were criminally charged for handcuffing suspects to chairs, draping towels over their faces and pouring water over the towel until a confession was elicited. One victim described the experience this way: "I thought I was going to be strangled to death. ... I couldn't breath."

The sheriff pleaded guilty and his deputies went to trial where they were convicted of civil rights violations. All received long prison sentences. U.S. District Judge James DeAnda told the former sheriff at sentencing, "The operation down there would embarrass the dictator of a country."

But not our president. He's just about as proud as can be of the "program," boasting about all the fine intelligence we've extracted from the likes of Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, while conveniently ignoring all the bad information that spilled out of him that sent our law enforcement on wild goose chases.

A former CIA insider suggests that the president has got it all wrong if he thinks CIA interrogators are looking for license to mistreat prisoners.

According to Fred Hitz, former CIA inspector general and veteran CIA operations officer: "There's nobody out there in the CIA that I can imagine who wants to be governed by a set of standards that is different from those in the Army Field Manual." Under that manual, abusive techniques are strictly barred.

So it's really the president and vice president and their minions who are pushing for interrogation techniques that Dr. Allen Keller, who directs a program for torture survivors in New York, calls "torture" and the infliction of "serious physical or mental pain and suffering."

Our leaders think the Military Commissions Act gives them the thumbs-up. But morality, common decency and history surely won't.

[Last modified October 22, 2006, 01:51:23]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by dargan 10/02/07 03:40 PM
you yanks think war is film set ,all you have ever been any good at is friendly fire and killing civilians,
by Krashkopf 05/23/07 06:04 PM
Lee, I chose my words VERY carefully, knowing full-well what they meant. Krash
by jackie 02/03/07 09:41 PM
Read about what the Japanese did to Ralph Ignatowski on Iwo Jima- there is a descriptive article on Wikipedia- they SHOULD have been sentenced!
by Victoria 02/03/07 09:40 PM
It depends what you call "torture"- if torture is a butt pyramid, folks, big deal. If embarassing the enemy amounts to information that will keep our boys and girls from dying at the hands of insurgents, then I say GO FOR IT! It's called WAR-grow up
by John 12/27/06 06:45 PM
Oh we pretended to drown someone! Boo Hoo. I think we should do worse to these terrorist.
by Lee 12/08/06 04:24 PM
If you think this is fascism we live under, you really need to study history a little bit better. I think it is a travesty that people like Krashkopf throw around the word fascism so lightly when you don't realize how horrible it was. Sad.
by Richard 11/01/06 12:21 AM
Interesting perspective. The act is specifically prohibits the torture you state the "President and his Minions susbscribe to" You should read it.
by Sonny 10/27/06 09:32 AM
It's simple, either we stick to our principles as a free nation or we become like our enemy. And yes, I suppose the statement "torture is wrong" is an opinion. Sad that Tom doesn't share it.
by Ken 10/26/06 10:49 AM
War crimes cannot be defined away. Mr. Bush and his cohorts should be indicted for setting up and defending an interrogation system that violates U.S. law and the Geneva Conventions.
by Mike 10/26/06 10:24 AM
I weep for my country.
by Tom 10/26/06 09:37 AM
This is not a news story it is opinion and should be clearly stated as such.
by howard 10/26/06 09:20 AM
You've got it all wrong.Haven't you heard? War criminals are always on the losing side.
by Krashkopf 10/26/06 09:19 AM
Under Bush, we have become the kind of fascist nation we fought against in WWII and the Cold War.
by Edward 10/25/06 01:14 AM
These cases demonstrate why civilized society forbids such tactics. Ihere are people who must be restrained.
by George 10/24/06 09:36 PM
Nice job of telling about this particular case. There are many more I'm aure, especially by the Japanese but others as well. Thank you.
by Florida Christian 10/24/06 05:57 PM
If we cant kill and torture people how are we ever going to be able to protect our American values?
by Michael 10/24/06 05:56 PM
Excellent as far as it goes. You need to go deeper into all the hidden depts. Into the "...send 'em to Syria." Which is where "they" torture the non-citizens whom they wish, e.g.
by Rick 10/24/06 05:50 PM
This really needed to be said, and documented, to prepare us for a future time, when a more decent population of Americans will look back on this decade with shame.
by ROBY 10/24/06 03:32 PM
Iam not surprised by this,Dictator Bush is becoming the worst dictator and acts of crimes against humanity in the history of this planet,this man loves the suffering of others,just look at Iraq,soon he will do to Americans also God help us from Bush
by Tom 10/24/06 02:27 PM
Things are coming to a head so if you are meek then prepare to inherit the Earth.
by joseph 10/24/06 01:35 PM
we will see how proud he is when the marines are tortured
by Phil 10/24/06 11:39 AM
We cannot control the evil that others do, but we are able to control our own actions. If we sanction torture we are worse than what we are fighting. The President says we dont torture but why have the law changed then?
by James 10/24/06 11:17 AM
The USA is a sick and twisted country.
by Max 10/24/06 10:34 AM
General MacArthur spoke out strongly against these sorts of activities as unworthy of Professional Soldiers. General Colin Powell was against this Military Comission bill - because he said it was ANTI-MILITARY and would harm our people.
by TOM 10/24/06 10:17 AM
What alternative do you suggest to get evil doers to give information ? A severe tongue lashing by a female columnist ?
by Sally 10/24/06 09:31 AM
Re: John's comment - this is an example of the mentality that has put this country where it is. Freedom to torture and the end of habeas corpus does not make this country safe - I think it makes it Germany in the 1930's.
by John 10/24/06 08:28 AM
The author sounds like an aploogist for TERRORISTS! I bet she won't be so smug if and when she is FORCED to wear a burka!
by Joseph 10/24/06 06:30 AM
Torture is also, as defined in international law, a war crime. It is that even when the US does it. And Geneva, which is part of our Constitution, trumps Congress' "detainee bill," rendering it unconstitutional, null-and-void.
by Terry 10/24/06 06:16 AM
Sir/Madam Funny how the sort of "third degree" tactics condmened by America when practised by the French in Algeria or us Brits in NI have mysteriously become licit for the "nasty ragheads" of Al Qaeda!
by Nelson 10/23/06 04:51 PM
they torture because they like it
by FRED 10/22/06 11:16 PM
THE IDENTICAL PROCESS WAS EMPLOYED IN GERMANY DURING THE DAYS OF DICTATORSHIP-AS WAS DURING THE DAYS OF THE MAN WHO SAID-WHILE HE ALLOWED HIM TO BE HUNG-"I FIND NO FAULT IN THIS MAN."
by Charlie 10/22/06 05:07 PM
Once you lower yourself to the enemies level you become the devil yourself. Our entire government is based on how we proceed towards an end; not, the end justifies the means. Bush has just flushed our ethical standards down the toilet.
by Janet 10/22/06 08:59 AM
Of all the unacceptable things that Bush has done and there are many, torture is the one thing that I cannot forgive, get over or forget. Torture is the very essence of evil and those who promote or use torture are also evil personified.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT