St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Court rejects school funding challenge

By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published November 3, 2006


ADVERTISEMENT

TALLAHASSEE - Appeals judges upheld a decision to keep a new funding formula that cut state aid to school districts in some areas with high living costs.

A three-judge panel of the 1st District Court of Appeal on Tuesday affirmed a trial court decision that last year rejected a challenge from five of Florida's 67 school districts.

Officials in the challenging districts were assessing their options Thursday.

"At this time no recommendation has been made," said Miami-Dade County associate school superintendent Alberto Carvalho. "Obviously, we are disappointed."

Miami-Dade alone has lost $88-million over three years under the new formula designed to compensate for differences among counties in wage costs, Carvalho said. He said the losses have affected salaries and curriculum.

Other county school districts that challenged the formula are Broward, Palm Beach, Monroe and Volusia.

The "district cost differential" had been based on a "market basket" of goods and services including housing, transportation, food and health care until the 2003-04 budget year.

The Legislature then replaced it with the wage-based formula. It also considers amenities that may cause workers to accept less pay despite higher living costs in certain areas.

The appellate court agreed with a Tallahassee trial judge who last year upheld the new formula. Circuit Judge Kevin Davey ruled the challenging districts failed to show the formula was illegal or unconstitutional.

[Last modified November 3, 2006, 00:03:47]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT