Video report
- For their own good
Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
- More video reports
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Dean: Dems should keep out Buchanan
By ANITA KUMAR and ADAM C. SMITH
Published December 7, 2006
|
ADVERTISEMENT
 |
|
[AP file photo]
“This election is not valid. There are 18,000 people who may have voted and we don’t know what happened to their votes,” Dean said.
|
|
WASHINGTON - Republican Vern Buchanan might be the official winner in a messy Sarasota-area congressional race, but Democratic National Committee chairman Howard Dean says the Democratic-controlled Congress should not seat Buchanan without another election. "Absolutely not," Dean said in a taped Political Connections interview scheduled to air Sunday on Bay News 9. "You cannot seat someone if you don't have an election that's valid. "This election is not valid. There are 18,000 people who may have voted, and we don't know what happened to their votes," Dean said. "You can bet that if the Republicans were 500 votes short they'd be calling for a new election, and they'd be right." On Wednesday, Democrat Christine Jennings said she will ask the U.S. House to take the extreme measure of conducting its own investigation into the election. Though Jennings has filed a lawsuit asking for a revote, a little-known provision in the U.S. Constitution gives the House the final decision on who sits in its chamber. Her decision could set the stage for a volatile political showdown at the start of the new Democrat-led Congress. Though Democratic leaders, include incoming House Speaker Nancy Pelosi, say all options are on the table, others privately say they hope to avoid the partisan warfare. "She's monitoring the situation very closely," Pelosi spokesman Drew Hammill said. "... We'll certainly be evaluating our options." Jennings has been in Washington drumming up support since Monday. She has met with House members and staffers for the House Administration Committee, which would be responsible for the investigation. "I can't imagine anyone in government, regardless of party, that's not concerned with what happened," Jennings said. Buchanan led Jennings by a few hundred votes on Election Day and in subsequent recounts. But Jennings is challenging the result because touch screen voting machines in Sarasota County recorded that more than 18,000 people, or 13 percent of all voters, did not vote for either candidate, a rate much higher than in other counties in the district. "We feel that Christine Jennings is putting her own interests above those of the 13th District," Buchanan spokeswoman Sally Tibbetts said. "It's unfortunate." Jennings filed suit in Leon County asking for a new vote and for her experts to be able to examine the voting machine's hardware, but it's unclear how long it might take for that legal case to be resolved. She has until Dec. 20 to file her request asking for a House investigation, which usually takes a few weeks to several months. Traditionally, the committee waits until all pending lawsuits are resolved before it launches its own inquiry. Since 1993, about 105 such cases have been sent to committee, but only a handful have made it to a full House vote. Usually the committee dismisses the case, though it could recommend to the full House that it order a new recount or new vote. The House also could simply refuse to seat the presumed winner, leaving the seat vacant or filling it with someone else. The House plans to swear in Buchanan, along with other new members, on Jan. 4, according to House Administration Committee spokeswoman Salley Collins. The House could unseat him later, if it chose. But members and political observers say either party would be reluctant to take up the case. "I think there would be a huge pushback in terms of the American people," said Rep. Tom Feeney, an Orlando area Republican. "I think that the consequences of that would be severe for the Democratic leadership." Rep. Jim Davis, a departing Tampa Democrat, said that the lawsuit should be resolved first but that, "No one should be afraid to get to the bottom of what happened." Dean said Jennings is right to keep pressing ahead with her legal challenges of the election: "You have to fight it all the way," he said. "This is an election that's a bad election." Times researcher Angie Drobnic Holan contributed to this report. Adam C. Smith can be reached at asmith@sptimes.com or 727893-8241. Anita Kumar can be reached at akumar@sptimes.com or (202)463-0576. ON TV See the interview Dean's full Political Connections interview airs Sunday at 11 a.m. on Bay News 9, and later can be seen at no cost on Ch. 342 (Bay News 9 on demand).
[Last modified December 7, 2006, 05:43:35]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Will
|
12/09/06 09:28 PM
|
|
We had a 5 candidate primary. Vern Buchanen was trashed unfairly by Tram Hudson and won with only 32%. The four losers didn't support him. I know dozens of Republicans in our circle of friends who didn't vote in the election.
|
|
by GOPMike
|
12/09/06 05:57 AM
|
|
I'm a Republican who just spent 2months in Sarasota collecting signatures to place an initiative on the city ballot. I am asking other Republicans to join me in calling for a revote. More information is available at my web site voteroversight.org.
|
|
by Dave
|
12/08/06 07:23 PM
|
|
Honest vote counts are a national issue. If all votes aren't reliably and honestly counted, we wind up with corrupt, arrogant thugs in power who feel no need to answer to the people. Like Bush.
|
|
by Dwight
|
12/08/06 07:18 PM
|
|
I am really surprized that many of those that commented can't appreciate an anomoly of this magnitude. C'mon people we are talking about only one county in the Congressional district that showed this anomally.10times the undervote that it should be.
|
|
by Cindy
|
12/08/06 02:59 PM
|
|
Howard Dean is absolutely correct. This is why we need him as the chair of the Democratic party. He is willing to speak truth to power in both parties. It is appalling that we do not have paper records for every vote cast everywhere, every time !
|
|
by Paul
|
12/08/06 02:58 PM
|
|
Learn some history, David. In 1984 the Democratic-controlled House threw out the state-certified result in Indiana's 8th District. When, since Republicans gained control of the House in January, 1995, have they done likewise?
|
|
by David C. Peterson
|
12/08/06 12:17 PM
|
|
Democrats should do exactly what the Republicans would do in this case, stick it to the Democrat, and not seat her. You know this is true.
|
|
by John
|
12/08/06 11:34 AM
|
|
You can go to any fast-food restaurant, any ATM, just about any store and touch screens can work just fine. Given that, then there is absolutely no excuse, none, that a voting machine cannot work properly.
|
|
by Rhonda
|
12/08/06 10:15 AM
|
|
Dean is right. These bizarro-world elections have to be investigated and redone. Politicians who win through bizarre elections can't expect to be seated. In a 'democracy' what can be more fundamental than trustworthy elections?
|
|
by Dustin
|
12/08/06 10:02 AM
|
|
It is not that 18,000 people did not vote. More then 18,000 people did not vote. The point is that in 18,000 recorded votes, there was no vote for US H-R, which according to the article is 01Ca rate much higher than in other counties in the district.01D
|
|
by Jeff
|
12/08/06 09:47 AM
|
|
Once again the Democrats are setting a precedent, as they did with unaccountable special independent prosecutors and the Bork and Thomas hearing circuses, that will come back to destroy then when it is applied back to themselves.
|
|
by Bert
|
12/08/06 08:43 AM
|
|
Editor: In one paragraph both "Democrat-led" and "Democratic leaders" appears. What are the grammatical considerations here? "Democrat-led" is ugly in my ears.
|
|
by matt
|
12/08/06 06:03 AM
|
|
Why can't voting machines be as credible as ATM's? Even the election officials can't figure out how to vote on them (note the recent flawed test vote). If your bank subtracted 18,000 dollars with no auditable record, you'd be upset too.
|
|
by NYSoxfan
|
12/08/06 12:59 AM
|
|
Regardless of the fact that FL-13 would not change the balance of power, this is an important test of U.S. election validity. If it can happen there, it can happen nationwide. Just letting it go -- given what we know -- is not an option.
|
|
by Lee
|
12/07/06 08:31 PM
|
|
SP Times: why no online of Dean interview?
Posters: Pull your heads out of the sand. Is there a cost TO YOU to wait a month? The greatest damage done to The U.S. Constitution over the last 6 years has been defended by Bush Apologistas!! You Lost!!!
|
|
by rick
|
12/07/06 08:18 PM
|
|
something is rotten in sarasota. 18,000 undercount is highly improbable on straight machines. don't let him in without recount. go howie!!!
|
|
by David
|
12/07/06 08:12 PM
|
|
I vote and would expect my vote to be counted. If we continue to exclude voters then do we have a democracy?
|
|
by Pete
|
12/07/06 08:07 PM
|
|
A revote makes sense. That percentage of undervote seems unlikely and unfortunately there are no paper ballots to recount. And the thing is this: If a Republican were on the short end of the stick, you can bet the RNC would be screaming about it.
|
|
by Chris
|
12/07/06 07:49 PM
|
|
From the 1st day of early voting, problems were documented with the voting machines. Since very few of the voters complaining were Republicans, nothing was done to fix the problems. Now a revote with paper ballots is needed to get the real winner.
|
|
by Greg
|
12/07/06 07:03 PM
|
|
So, let me get this straight... The 18,000 voters in precincts using the DRE machines were turned off by the negative campaigning, but the voters in all the other precincts weren't? It doesn't pass the smell test, and every sentient human knows it.
|
|
by Ed
|
12/07/06 05:09 PM
|
|
Well Sarasota is big money and corruption. Look and see who they put in office a few years back, Harris.
|
|
by Bill
|
12/07/06 01:31 PM
|
|
I believe Dean's right in principle. However, there are lots of problems with a re-vote, and I suspect there would be lawsuits on behalf of people who voted the first time but were unable to make the re-vote. But let's at least learn what went wrong
|
|
by JD
|
12/07/06 01:20 PM
|
|
Another election for a 2-year seat that isn't even required for Democratic control of the House? Nope, I don't think so. Just accept it, Howie.
|
|
by Dan
|
12/07/06 11:45 AM
|
|
With all the negative campagning I'm surprised that more people didn't pass on the vote. Politics just keep going down hill.
|
|
by Vicki
|
12/07/06 09:12 AM
|
|
Both Canidates ran such NEGATIVE ads... It does not surprise my that 18,000 did not vote because neither of them seemed to be honest in their ads. Let it Go Dean.
|
|
by Jason
|
12/07/06 08:48 AM
|
|
I really like Howard Dean, but I think he's gone a little overboard. The election is valid and has been certified. Tests on the voting machines have been done and been found in perfect working order. It's time for Jennings to get over it and move on!
|
|
by bob
|
12/07/06 07:30 AM
|
|
Why am I not surprised. Unless a democrat wins, the vote is not correct for any of a million idiot reasons. May be if the schools were educating kids on the real facts of life than the sexual facts of life, adults wouldn't look so ignorant. Fools.
|
|
by Bill
|
12/07/06 07:21 AM
|
|
1st both parties need to look at who they put up in this election. Then they most all relize that maybe, just maybe that 18,000 people did not vote because they didn't like either of the canidates.
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
|