Video report
- For their own good
Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
- More video reports
|
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
GOP slinks away from ethics mess
A Times Editorial
Published December 13, 2006
U.S. House Republicans clearly hoped the last word on the Foley scandal would be the ethics committee's disappointing report they quickly dropped last week as the session and their 12 years in power ended. But a report that is all tough talk and no action to hold anyone accountable should trigger a broader conversation about ethics and accountability when Democrats take charge in January. The disgraced former South Florida congressman will be long gone, but the issues raised by his inappropriate contact with pages and the failure by House staffers and members to respond still will require attention. Holding anyone responsible for their failure to uphold standards of conduct proved too much to expect from an ethics committee that ultimately reported to outgoing House Speaker Dennis Hastert, who suffered a convenient case of amnesia about his own role. But in the days leading up to the midterm elections, when conservative activists were calling for his resignation, Hastert insisted, "If anybody's found to have hidden information or covered up information, they really should be gone." While voters certainly sent some House members packing, the ethics committee was content to wag its finger. It found that after the scandal broke, Rep. Jim Kolbe, R-Ariz., advised one former page not to reveal other Foley e-mails written in 2001. The chief of staff for Rep. Rodney Alexander, R-La., apparently called a page's father a year ago to warn that reporters "were trying to make something" of the e-mails. Hastert, the panel wrote, was informed by two high-ranking House members of the e-mail concerns. In tough language, the report found "political considerations" were a factor and found "a significant number of instances where members, officers or employees failed to exercise appropriate diligence and oversight." It used the words "willful ignorance" to describe how House members and staff handled the information. None of those criticisms led the committee to recommend sanctions, and the only solution it offered was that "the current operation of the page program should be reviewed to ensure that its structure and management remain sound." It didn't take an investigation to reach that conclusion. Among the many obligations facing incoming Speaker Nancy Pelosi, then, is one to the young pages who have played a historic role in Congress. She has to assure that the students are insulated from harm and create a culture where ethical standards take precedence over political calculations. Pelosi has promised a new era in ethics and candor in Congress, and the page program is one place to start.
[Last modified December 13, 2006, 01:21:28]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by RR
|
12/13/06 06:33 PM
|
|
Unbeleivable, the Times sits on the Foley emails for a year because they are afraid to be perceived as anti gay and now they seek to blame Hastert. What a sad paper, maybe they should have the TV guy write editorials again.
|
|
by Mark
|
12/13/06 02:30 PM
|
|
I can only say that I'm almost giddy with excitement that now that the Dem's are in place, we can expect lily-white, clean-as-a-whistle administration, AND the war will end, AND the economy will truly take off, AND all the kids will be educated! WOW
|
|
by Theo
|
12/13/06 12:54 PM
|
|
yeah, Paul, like Barney Frank....you're right, there is a big difference between Foley (Republican) that didn't do anything and Barney Frank (democrat) who did (and he's still in office and who knows what he is still doing to his pages).
|
|
by paul
|
12/13/06 12:06 PM
|
|
BIG difference, june, in activity between consenting adults, and unwanted and inappropriate activity by an adult against minors. BIG, BIG DIFFERENCE. sorry you are unable to differentiate between the two.
|
|
by Fred
|
12/13/06 11:31 AM
|
|
You'd think that after your favorite party won the November 2006 election, you'd wouldn't have the need to keep "bashing" the Republicans, but just like a pig that keeps heading to the slop, you can't help yourself (The St. Pete Times).
|
|
by Tom
|
12/13/06 10:48 AM
|
|
This editorial is typical. Hastert "amnesia?" Have you read the full report. One more bias, unfounded slap at the Republicans. The unethical behavior crosses party lines. Great job on "yellow" journalism. Read the report!
|
|
by robert
|
12/13/06 09:11 AM
|
|
The worst part of this whole mess is that the Republicans spent so much money on a man in the White House to expose his sins they forgot that their sins would find them out.
|
|
by June
|
12/13/06 08:59 AM
|
|
I agree that Foley is scum, but let me remind you, Bil Clinton is not a name that invokes purity. Evil and immorality has almost taken over this country and it amazes me how the liberals do not disagree with any of it, unless it is a foe.
|
|
by Evan
|
12/13/06 04:47 AM
|
|
Having read the editorial,I find that any reasonal person would conclude that only the Republicans have ethical problems that have to be examined.
But a reasonal person would conclude that someone "Times"is covering up for the Dem's.
|
|
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.
|