Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Political stunts aren't tax reform
A Times Editorial
Published December 13, 2006
Just the words "tax revolt" are enough to send most Florida lawmakers into a panic attack, so the appointed Property Tax Reform Committee is supposed to provide a steady hand. But as the group prepares Friday to complete its preliminary report, it is actually considering a recommendation that all property taxes simply be abolished. This is adult supervision? Eliminating the property tax would require the state to raise its sales tax from the current 6 cents on the dollar to 13.5 cents, making an already regressive system intolerable. Yet Donna Arduin, a committee member who was the former budget director for Gov. Jeb Bush, acts as though fairness is a quaint concept. "The property tax system we have now isn't exactly the opiate," she told members, according to published reports. "Let's not just use the old adage 'regressive' and dismiss it." With such flippant discourse, the committee last month agreed to keep the issue alive and undermined their credibility as a competent, realistic panel. The committee was appointed by Bush to review concerns about rising property tax bills, and its members have diligently listened to taxpayers in a series of meetings throughout the state. The work is proceeding at the same time as that of the Department of Revenue, which the Legislature has ordered to thoroughly analyze the impact of property tax exemptions and rates. The biggest current problem is that a tax exemption called Save Our Homes, passed by voters in 1992, has created enormous tax inequities between homeowners. The constitutional amendment artificially limits the taxable value for those who stay put in their homes, which has led some homeowners who have moved to pay double or triple the amount of their neighbor. Save Our Homes also has shifted the tax burden to all other property owners, including the owners of businesses and investment properties. This year, the property rate statewide could have been reduced an average of 20 percent if Save Our Homes were not in effect. The committee is looking at a whole of range tax issues, including the inequities. But it needs to be careful to avoid getting caught up in the politics of the debate. Lawmakers undoubtedly will be looking for a quick fix during this spring's regular session, but quick fixes and bumper-sticker solutions are mostly to blame for the current predicament. To his credit, Hillsborough Property Appraiser Rob Turner, a member of the committee, has asked to take the long view. He wants to do something that politicians would consider heresy but amounts to sound tax policy. He would ultimately do away with Save Our Homes with the promise that no current owners would be affected and that the standard $25,000 homestead exemption would be increased. Turner's idea is still in its formative stages, but it is worth serious consideration and reflects a reasonable attempt at a long-range, comprehensive approach. It is precisely the kind of antidote to political pandering that an appointed committee is in the best position to recommend. On the other hand, suggesting Florida abolish property taxes and drastically raise the state sales tax would be just another political stunt that should be beneath a committee intent on producing recommendations that are thoughtful and reasonable.
[Last modified December 13, 2006, 01:21:12]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Gerold
|
11/04/07 10:27 PM
|
|
Florida has the reputation for the highest mortgage fraud in the nation. These inflated values (not real sales) end up being used by county appraisers as actual sales and affect values through fradulent prices. This should be investigated and changed
|
|
by Andy
|
12/13/06 08:22 PM
|
|
Speaking of flippant, whatever happened to the serious editorial writers that used to work for The Times?
|
|
by Andy
|
12/13/06 08:20 PM
|
|
Eliminating property tax doesn't sound flippant at all. Taxes are meant to pay for services and it's presently out of whack. If it costs $1M to put a road in front of a $50,000 house, that road won't cost $2M if it's a $100M house.
|
|
by Dee
|
12/13/06 07:30 PM
|
|
What need to happen is to contain municipal and state spending. The more they get in taxes the more they spend and the more they want to spend. It's a vicous cycle that needs to be halted.
|
|
by Jackball
|
12/13/06 03:00 PM
|
|
How about going back to 1992 taxes for everyone, adding the 3% a years or inflation. Take into account the appraised values, what ever it is you do. Then increase sales tax to make up the difference. Smaller government!!!!!
|
|
by knuckle
|
12/13/06 02:55 PM
|
|
Lets take a step back and try to determine how it is possible that the tax base in Lee county has more than doubled in 2 years. Problem solved. The County is gouging tax payers. Instead of looking for ways to change the burden, try cutting government
|
|
by Betty
|
12/13/06 10:23 AM
|
|
I totally disagree with you. Lifting the burden of taxes from homeowners is a great idea. At least with sales tax, it would be a pay as you go deal instead of being slammed with an enormous bill. Keep your mind open to off-the-table ideas.
|
|