St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Report: Diana's death 'tragic accident'

By WASHINGTON POST
Published December 15, 2006


ADVERTISEMENT

LONDON - Nine years after Princess Diana died in a car crash in Paris, one of the most exhaustive official investigations in recent British history has concluded that her death was a tragic accident and not murder.

"I do not believe that any evidence currently exists that can substantiate the allegations of conspiracy to murder; there was no conspiracy and there was no coverup," said John Stevens, who led a $7-million Scotland Yard inquiry that took nearly three years and involved more than 300 witness interviews, computerized modeling of the crash site and even pregnancy testing on Diana's blood found in the smashed Mercedes sedan.

The 832-page report did not assess blame for the deaths.

"A crash of this nature is similar to a major crash of an airliner," said Stevens, a former Metropolitan Police chief. "There is a long chain of events. Take out any link of that chain and this would not have happened."

The Stevens inquiry is part of a wider British government investigation into the death, which has been long-delayed by complex police investigations and a lengthy French investigation, which concluded in 1999 that the deaths of Diana, 36, her companion, Dodi Fayed, 42, and chauffeur Henri Paul were accidental.

Prince William and his younger brother, Prince Harry, released a statement Thursday saying they "trust that these conclusive findings will end the speculation surrounding the death of their mother."

Dodi Fayed's father, Mohamed al Fayed, told reporters that the report was "garbage" and a "coverup" and that Stevens was a "tool for the establishment and the royal family."

Key findings from a three-year police investigation of the deaths of Princess Diana and her boyfriend, Dodi Fayed:

What happened: The report did not assign blame for the Aug. 31, 1997, crash.

Safety: Henri Paul, who was driving, had a blood-alcohol level more than three times the French legal limit. None of those killed was wearing a seat belt.

Engagement: No evidence that Diana and Dodi Fayed were engaged. A friend of the princess, Annabel Goldsmith, said Diana told her the night before her death: "I need marriage like a rash on my face."

Pregnancy: Fayed's father alleged Diana was pregnant with his son's child. Tests on Diana's blood found no evidence of pregnancy.

Royal family: The inquiry found no evidence to support al Fayed's claim that Philip, Charles' father, was directly involved in a conspiracy to murder the princess.

MI5: The inquiry categorically dismissed the role of British internal intelligence agency MI5 in Diana's death.

Various theories: The inquiry dismissed theories centering around a Fiat that allegedly hit Diana's Mercedes at some point during the evening, a very bright flash reportedly seen in the tunnel before the accident, and the suicide of a man some accused of being at the scene of the crash.

 

[Last modified December 15, 2006, 01:03:04]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by ashley 04/28/07 07:46 AM
the date of princess diana's birth
by ashley 04/28/07 07:43 AM
where did she die
by cheri 12/16/06 09:22 AM
Thank you Orlando.
by Chris 12/15/06 12:05 PM
" one of the most exhaustive official investigations in recent British history"? I can't believe they spent all their time on this. I guess there's nothing important going on across the pond.
by ORLANDO 12/15/06 02:38 AM
THE DEATH OF DIANA IS THE COVER UP OF PRINCE CHARLES BUT PEOPLE KNOWS IT WAS A PLAN FOR THE DEATH OF TWO PERSON IN LONDON BECAUSE IT IS RIVAL BETWEEN TWO ROYAL FAMILY IN LONDON.I HOPE THEY WIL FIND THE TRUTH OF THE STORY SO THAT THEY RESPECT ROYALFAM
by mae 12/15/06 02:05 AM
thank God!!!
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT