St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Slow death raises execution questions

By JEAN HELLER
Published December 15, 2006


ADVERTISEMENT

The protracted death of Angel Diaz on Wednesday in Starke has again called into question Florida's methods of executing prisoners. Not since the state adopted lethal injection in 2000 have so many questions been asked about Florida's execution style. Here is a look at some of the history and issues:

How many states use lethal injection as a means of execution?

Of the 38 states that have capital punishment laws, lethal injection is the primary or optional form of execution in 37.

How many prisoners in Florida have been executed by lethal injection since 2000?

Diaz was the 20th. Terry M. Sims, 58, became the first inmate executed by lethal injection in Florida. He was executed Feb. 23, 2000, for the 1977 slaying of a volunteer deputy sheriff in a Central Florida robbery. The next day, Anthony Bryan, 40, died from lethal injection for the 1983 slaying of a night watchman, who was abducted in Mississippi and killed in Florida.

What is the three-drug cocktail used to put a prisoner to death by lethal injection?

Sodium thiopental, a sedative also known as Sodium Pentothal that quickly causes loss of consciousness; pancuronium bromide, used to paralyze the entire muscle system and stop breathing; and potassium chloride, which induces cardiac arrest. The line by which each drug is delivered intravenously is cleaned with a wash of saline solution after each drug is administered to keep it unclogged.

Has there ever been a case before where a condemned prisoner had to be given more than one dose of this cocktail?

The state Department of Corrections said it has happened before but would give no details.

What exactly went wrong in the Diaz execution?

That is unanswered so far. Department of Corrections officials say that Diaz's liver disease could have decreased the efficacy of the drugs. Experts said an air bubble in the delivery line might have blocked the drugs or the vein into which the drugs were flowing collapsed. Many inmates with a history of intravenous drug use have weak veins.

If Diaz had liver problems that could have caused the first dose of poison to fail, weren't there ways the Department of Corrections could have compensated for that?

DOC protocol states that if the dosage of drugs given is not effective, give more. That protocol was followed. Why it took Diaz three to four times longer to die than those executed in the past is not known yet.

Is there any way to know for sure whether this method of execution is painful, or whether some of the gestures and movements made by the prisoner were involuntary muscle spasms?

There are strong opinions both ways. Medical experts say the condemned individual is probably unaware of discomfort if the sodium thiopental is delivered correctly and in doses high enough to cause complete unconsciousness. But if an error is made, the prisoner could experience moderate to severe pain.

When did the idea of lethal injection originate in this country?

In 1888 in New York, when it was suggested that execution by an overdose of morphine would be more humane and deprive the condemned of martyrdom if it replaced hanging. The idea didn't catch on, and it was another 89 years before Oklahoma became the first state to approve lethal injection in 1977.

How many executions by lethal injection are there each year?

There were 60 in the United States last year.

 

 

 

[Last modified December 15, 2006, 01:01:58]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Chris 02/15/08 10:08 PM
I believe in the death penalty only on certain accasions, if the conviction is severe enough and depending on what they did to there victim, if it was just a robbery, theres no reason for it...murder is a different story
by Molly 09/25/07 01:26 PM
Fast or slow death ........There victums didnt have a choice..It's called a punishment for a reasn
by Gary 08/23/07 04:22 AM
Basically the same method to induce unconciousness before surgery is used at lethal injection executions. If there is a need to stop muscle movement then probably pancuronium bromide or simalar is used. The executed does not suffer. He's unconcious.
by Wendy 06/11/07 03:14 AM
I think the way the drugs are administered is commendable. There will always be the exceptions which will be dealt with when they occur.
by Todd 06/06/07 01:54 AM
Who cares if the inmate suffers. Think of the victims families. I say offer one of the 2 following methods. 1. Hang the bastard. 2. Fireing squad.
by Paul 02/09/07 07:52 PM
I agree that lethal injection is probably inhumane. Please call your state reps and tell them they should be investing in a guillotine because the only way to cause INSTANT death is to destroy the brain stem.
by Gretchen 12/16/06 12:33 PM
What people fail to take into condideration re: the constitutionality of the death penalty is simply this: anticipatory pain. Languishinhg on death row for the average 14 years with multiple stays can be considered nothing if not cruel & unusual.
by Shelley 12/16/06 12:22 PM
We spend more taking care of the inmates than we do of the nations poor. They get 3 meals, all medical and clothing! Give them 6 months from the time of sentencing and execute them. Civil and just? Were they civil when they killed innocent people?
by Julie 12/16/06 12:19 PM
I really do not care if he suffered. He killed someone and should die the most painful death. Maybe if criminals knew they would suffer they would think twice. Executions should happen in a timely manner. Years is just to long to house murderers.
by Melle 12/16/06 12:06 PM
I find it inexplicable that the Press is so concerned with what the killer (Diaz) felt or suffered but not one question to anyone about what the victims felt or suffered. He got what he deserved.
by Joan 12/16/06 11:42 AM
There will never be humane execution because civilized people aren't carrying it out. Stop the Death Penalty altogether. This is supposed to be a civilized society. We are no better than the criminals who've killed if we kill.
by sheila 12/16/06 11:36 AM
I am tired of paying taxes for people who kill....they should suffer....do i loose sleep over it....but i bet the loved ones of the victims have lost alot of sleep....let em suffer!!!!!
by alice 12/16/06 10:32 AM
What i don't understand is we keep these people in jail for years before we even kill them. I think they should be left to die in jail because we are killing old men. What harm can you do at 77 years old.
by steve 12/16/06 10:27 AM
So much concern over the death of a convicted murderer. Why not let the crime decide and kill them in the same manner that they took a life !
by mike 12/16/06 10:11 AM
come on folks!!!do you think these convicted murders stopped and thought for even a second before they killed their victims if their method was going to hurt the vittim before he/she killed them...give me a break,who cares if it hurts them!!!
by Ica 12/16/06 09:40 AM
I don't think whether there is any Human person with moral authrity to experiment on what he/she can't produce!The whole process as argued a rests my understanding and conciouses when a nation that trust in God commits such a crime against man.
by Sam 12/16/06 09:13 AM
I never understood the eye-for-an-eye justification people cite for execution when we have rejected that type of reasoning everywhere else in our legal system. Executions are rediculous and uncivilized. I say lock 'em up and let 'em get raped in jail
by Tristian 12/16/06 08:48 AM
Personally, I think people sentenced to execution should be executed in the same manner of their victim. We should display this live on T.V. GLOBALLY because millions would watch it. Now we have a solution to fund our prison systems.
by NORMAN 12/16/06 08:37 AM
I THINK WE NEED THE LIST OF THOSE OPPOSING A DEATH SENTENCE SO WE CAN SEND THESE OFFENDERS TO LIVE WITH THEM AND SEE HOW LONG IT TAKES THEM TO CHANGE THEIR MINDS
by Mark 12/16/06 08:35 AM
The pain that they go though is alot less than the pain of the people that they killed.
by Patrick 12/16/06 08:34 AM
Seems to me that if the second drug paralyzes all the muscles, (including the heart) the third one will take longer to get to the heart or brain. Doesn't matter though- they ought to go through alot of pain- just like they inflicted on their victims.
by Robert 12/16/06 08:24 AM
The execution of anyone is barbaric. How is it that citizens allow government to kill when evidence exists all around us that government fails us every day?
by Jacq 12/16/06 07:49 AM
I don't understand all the hype here, especially if the Sodium Petathol rendered him unconscious. Was he particularly kind when he committed murder? We are so concerned with being human to the criminals in a system where the victim isn't considered
by Don 12/16/06 02:11 AM
Give me a break folks, these people were sentenced to die because of their having killed a completely innocent person. Who cares if they suffer a little pain; I'm sure that some of their victims suffered equally or more.
by Tommy 12/15/06 11:48 PM
I must be missing something here. Why can't a drug similar to those used in hospitals every day be administerd to render someone unconscious, and then simply stop the heart.
by Geegee 12/15/06 09:33 PM
Will this (alleged) civilized society ever learn? To what extent must we torture individuals in the name of justice? The animal kingdom knows better than humankind...
by JOHN 12/15/06 09:02 PM
AGAIN ALL THOSE PEOPLE THAT DONT WANT THE DEATH PENALTY. LETS GET THERE NAMES AND SSN AND LET THEM PAY THE EXTRA TAXES TO CARE FOR THE INMATES. AND IF YOU THINK ABOUT IT, THATS WHY THE VICTIMS FAMILYS TAKE MATERS INTO THERE OWN HANDS.
by JOHN 12/15/06 08:54 PM
YOU KNOW THERE IS A PROBLEM IN THE US AT THIS TIME. SOME OF THESE PEOPLE ON DEATH ROW HAVE PUT THERE VICTIMS THROUGH HELL. DID THEY THINK ON HOW MUCH PAIN THEY PUT THE VICTIM THROUGH. ALL THE PEOPLE THAT DONT WANT THE DEATH PENALITY, PAY EXTRA TAXES.
by nancy 12/15/06 07:03 PM
did his victim suffer?
by Beverly 12/15/06 05:52 PM
I think it is absurd to even wast our time in the investigation of this matter. This man committed "cold blooded murder". He recieved a fair trial and has been housed by our prison system for many years..by the tax payers moneies. Give Me a Break!
by John 12/15/06 05:35 PM
Executions are are barbaric, expecilly so in a "Christion" nation. Can you imagine Jesus sitting in on an execution.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT