Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Officials queasy about evicting poor
Early edition: The buyer of a St. Petersburg public housing complex once pledged not to put anyone out.
By CURTIS KRUEGER and AARON SHAROCKMAN
Published December 19, 2006
ST. PETERSBURG — The decision to move 300 residents out of a public housing complex has created a backlash from City Council members, St. Petersburg’s mayor and even some members of the housing board that approved the deal.
“I can’t rest knowing that we’re putting this many people back on the street with no place to go,” said St. Petersburg Housing Authority board member David Welch.
The Housing Authority has approved the sale of the complex to a private developer, Vector Realty, which initially promised that no one would have to move out. But this month, the Housing Authority told residents they would have to leave. Vector plans to convert the 486-unit Graham-Rogall complex near Tropicana Field to condominiums.
“I’m very disappointed in Vector,” Housing Authority board member Paul Yingst said. “It’s pretty traumatic for the residents to have to relocate.”
Mayor Rick Baker said the immediate focus needs to be helping the residents of the complex. But he also said the Housing Authority’s actions warrant review.
“I’ve not heard enough to give me comfort,” he said. Welch and housing board member Deveron Gibbons said the Housing Authority should at least consider voiding the sales contract.
But St. Petersburg Housing Authority executive director Darrell Irions said “nobody’s going to be left on the street, no one’s going to be left out there without help.”
Irions said about $1-million of the pending $12.3-million sale would go to help the complex’s low-income elderly and disabled residents move into different housing, where they still would receive rent subsidies. The rest of the cash would allow the agency to buy or build more affordable housing units in the city.
“Hopefully, the best thing will be done in the long run for the residents,” said board member Harry Harvey, who spent some of his teenage years in public housing in Sanford.
The Housing Authority for years has pondered selling the Graham-Rogall complex, partly because “it’s obsolescent, it’s expensive to maintain, it’s a safety hazard,” housing board member Walt Smyth said.
For example, the housing authority had to spend $1-million to install sprinklers. He said the elevators hold only one motorized scooter at a time, which raises questions about how quickly disabled residents could evacuate the building.
Irions said the Housing Authority in 2004 sought out purchase offers, and “we were going after the highest dollar,” so that the authority could use the money to pay for the most new housing.
Irions said although the Housing Authority did not require potential buyers to guarantee residents could continue living there, the agency asked them if they would. And the winning bidder, Vector Realty, said yes.
On March 3, 2004, Vector said in a letter that “under no circumstances will we relocate the existing tenants.” The company wrote later that month that it planned “to leave the Graham-Rogall complex as apartments for the next three to five years.”
[Last modified December 19, 2006, 21:28:23]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Blue
|
12/20/06 10:13 AM
|
|
Maybe commenters should talk to HUD, who underfunds public housing to the point buildings become decrepit. If they use the money to create new affordable housing not subsidized by HUD, it will be a great deal.
|
|
by Dan
|
12/20/06 06:19 AM
|
|
Merry Christmas residents of Graham Rogall, happy holidays, you will soon be homeless, but wait! Hark, a star in the East is coming to move you into non existent low income housing. More displaced low income folks, for condo's.
|
|
by Kahty
|
12/20/06 06:13 AM
|
|
Where are you going to move my clients where they can live on their below poverty level income? Where are these places? If the city has housing for indigent and disabled available, it is the best kept secret in St. Petersburg!!!!!!
|
|
by Bill
|
12/20/06 06:01 AM
|
|
What!?! The City is surprised that a DEVELOPER reneged on a promise not to move low-income residents from a potential condominium gold mine?!? I have a bridge to sell the city!
|
|
by Robert
|
12/20/06 05:52 AM
|
|
Once again we see the results of the failure of our local govt. not requiring your "yes mean yes and your no mean no".
|
|
by Fred
|
12/20/06 04:15 AM
|
|
Greed always win out over need. "What you do to the poorest of MY people, you do unto me.
|
|
by Lisa
|
12/20/06 01:13 AM
|
|
Great. More condos. Just what the city needs. Why not have requirements to live in Saint Petersburg? You have to be 21-35, in good health and make a minimum of $40k. Must have ruby colored glasses as well.
|
|
by elizabeth
|
12/20/06 12:33 AM
|
|
coming from a person who has been on the waiting list for over three years i say its a wonderful thing as long as all monies are put back into providing rogall residents and other poor and disabled are finally being actknowledged and dealt with.
|
|
by SHIRLEY
|
12/19/06 11:55 PM
|
|
IT TOOK YEARS TO GET INTO THIS TYPE OF HOUSING W/ OUT ANY RESOURCES. YET IT TAKES MONEY TO MOVE THEM OUT AND THEN NOT
EVEINTO NORMALLY A BETTER PLACE. ONLY THE DEVELOPER WINS NEVER THE TENENT!! THESE ARE THE REAL PROBLEMS FACEING LOW INCOME FAMILIY'
|
|