Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Judge gives visitation rights to former Katrina dog owners
Early edition
By DEMORRIS A. LEE
Published December 26, 2006
ST. PETERSBURG — Noah was at obedience school Tuesday learning how to control his temper.
The St. Bernard that Hillsborough County prosecutor Pam Bondi adopted after Hurricane Katrina has become so possessive that he is aggressive if someone comes too close to Bondi, her attorney told a judge Tuesday.
Nevertheless, Pinellas County Judge Henry Andringa ordered Bondi on Tuesday to make the St. Bernard available so Steven and Doreen Couture of Louisiana can visit with him. Andringa issued the same order to Rhonda Rineker, who adopted the Couture’s other dog, a shepherd mix.
Murray Silverstein, the Couture’s attorney, said the St. Bernard’s alleged behavioral problems were news to him and his clients.
“That was the biggest, most docile, creature I’ve ever seen,” he said.
Silverstein had asked Andringa to enforce a Aug. 1 ruling for visitation, which he said Bondi and Rineker stopped complying with after several visits last fall.
Bondi and Rineker’s attorneys argued that they didn’t agree to visitation. At a hearing on the issue last week, Andringa called a recess and ordered the attorneys to provide more information.
When the attorneys reassembled on Tuesday, Andringa said, “I intend to order visitation.” He then wanted to know if the attorneys could work out the details among themselves.
“I would prefer to defer to you folks,” Andringa said. “Do I think you can solve it? Do I need to solve it? Yes.”
Bondi, who lives in Tampa and Rineker, who lives in Dunedin, as well as the Pinellas Humane Society are being sued by the Coutures in an effort to get back the dogs, rescued by the Humane Society after Hurricane Katrina.
The Coutures had been allowed three visits with the dogs between September and October. But Silverstein contended that Bondi and Rineker unilaterally refused visitation without cause or justification, which violated the Aug. 1 order.
With Andringa’s decision Tuesday, the Coutures will now be able to see the dogs every two to three weeks starting Jan. 5 until the matter is settled at trial. A trial date will be set Jan. 12.
Both dogs were rescued from St. Bernard Parish, La. Bondi and Rineker adopted them from the Humane Society of Pinellas in October 2005. Bondi adopted the St. Bernard, known as Master Tank, and named him Noah. Rineker adopted the shepherd mix and changed her name from Nila to Gracie.
The Coutures tracked the dogs to Pinellas County and sued in June after several failed attempts to get them back. Bondi has argued that the St. Bernard she adopted was sick and improperly cared for and was not even the dog the Coutures lost. Rineker has contended she adopted an abandoned dog in good faith.
At Tuesday’s hearing, attorneys for Bondi and Rineker said they were worried about liability.
Bondi’s attorney, Camille Godwin told the judge she was concerned that if Master Tank got aggressive around the Coutures’ two grandchildren, that Bondi not be liable for the outcome.
Rineker’s attorney, Jeff Brown, who participated via speaker phone, likewise was concerned about liability issues as well as about pictures being taken during visits and later used in court.
Brown also expressed concerns about where the visitation would take place because the Rinekers wanted to be present, but they didn’t want the visitation to take place at their home.
Andringa ordered that no pictures be taken and that nothing said during the visitations could be used during the trial. As for the location, Andringa said there were plenty of dog parks in the area.
He also encouraged both sides to move the case along so that both the visitation and larger issues can be resolved.
“We can take it to trial and end this,” he said to the lawyers. “I assume that’s what you all want, right?”
Demorris A. Lee can be reached at dalee@sptimes.com or (727) 445-4174.
[Last modified December 26, 2006, 21:04:43]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Kim
|
04/19/07 07:59 AM
|
|
I'm commenting because my parents live next door to Bondi. The previous owners want $ from sueing. They left their dog tied out in the backyard during the hurricane! What right do they have to get it back? Also, what does it say about future adopts?
|
|
by Pat
|
12/27/06 09:43 AM
|
|
What a crock- learning to control his temper!? And Rineker is Bondi's puppet. Coincidence - the same time visitation goes before the judge?? Get ready for every trick in the book to delay returning these dogs to these children. Have they no shame?
|
|
by gary
|
12/27/06 07:18 AM
|
|
Dog parents?
|
|
by Michael
|
12/27/06 07:15 AM
|
|
Talk about ignorance.....visitation? well in that case how about some "dog support" and alimony to go along with it. Time for someone to retire from the bench.
|
|
by Debbie
|
12/27/06 01:09 AM
|
|
I think that Bondi and Rineker are being selfish. What is being forgotten here is the welfare of the dogs. If the dogs are accepting the Coutures, then being left behind after every visit is cruel. Master Tank & Nila need their real parents/owners.
|
|
by lisa
|
12/26/06 11:35 PM
|
|
This is ridiculous. The dogs belong with the new owners. Those people did not make plans for their pets. They were abandoned. They should not come whining now - they should be glad that the pet has a home with someone who loves them.
|
|
by Joy
|
12/26/06 11:12 PM
|
|
What horrible people these are, particularly Bondi. Not only does she have the Coutures' dog, whatever else she thinks, she also tries to make them look like bad owners.
|
|
by Sandra
|
12/26/06 10:31 PM
|
|
What the heck is being done to Tank that he is turning from a gentle friend into a vicious dog? Return these dogs immediately before any more damage is done!
|
|