St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

'Great' but secret, intelligence projects get grants

By Washington Post
Published December 30, 2006


ADVERTISEMENT

WASHINGTON - Director of National Intelligence John Negroponte awarded $200,000 grants earlier this month to 10 scientists in the intelligence community, one of whom could not be named and several of whom declined to be interviewed, for projects whose details remain secret.

The DNI office issued a news release with nine of the recipients' names, agencies, job titles and educational backgrounds. One awardee's information was omitted "because of the sensitive position he occupies in his organization," the release said.

This is the second annual DNI Fellows award program. Last year's recipients, the release says, "made significant progress with technology to locate terrorists and to extract intelligence from remote areas."

How they did that remains secret.

"We want to keep that spark of innovation alive and healthy," said Eric Haseltine, associate director of national intelligence for science and technology, whose office selected the grant recipients.

The Department of Homeland Security and science and technology branches of intelligence agencies - including the FBI, CIA, National Security Agency, National Reconnaissance Office, Defense Intelligence Agency and National Geospatial-Intelligence Agency - nominated employees. The criteria, Haseltine said, are "first and foremost, virtuoso technical achievement," plus risk-taking, innovation and "teamwork, because sometimes virtuosos don't play well with others."

Playing well with reporters is not a criterion. All of the CIA awardees declined interviews; ditto for the NSA. Other fellows couldn't be located, or persuaded, by deadline.

"It's great news," said one agency representative, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because discussing the reasons for not discussing the projects could violate secrecy rules. "But because it's classified, you can't talk about it."

Last try: the Department of Homeland Security. Its awardee, Michelle Keeney, was downright chatty about how she will spend her grant money. "The plan is kind of generally to sponsor a research project on the evolution of radical movements over time and their adoption of violence as a strategy," she said. "It's not an intelligence exercise but a research project using information that is historically gathered in the public domain."

That's why she can talk about it.

 

 

 

[Last modified December 30, 2006, 00:41:42]


Share your thoughts on this story

[an error occurred while processing this directive]
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT