Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Archaeologist's find could shake up science
By HEATHER URQUIDES
Published January 7, 2007
Archaeologist Albert Goodyear is working on the find of his life. Based on radiocarbon tests and artifacts he's found along the Savannah River in South Carolina, Goodyear believes that humans existed in North America as many as 50,000 years ago, shattering the long-held notion that the earliest settlers arrived here about 13,000 years ago in Alaska via a lost land bridge. Not everyone is convinced, but Goodyear believes further excavation and testing at the South Carolina location, known as the Topper site, will confirm his findings. He's taking a break next week to come to St. Petersburg for a talk at the Science Center about Florida's first inhabitants. It's a coming home for him. After all, it was here that his interest in all things old first began. You're from St. Petersburg? I was born in St. Petersburg. I went to Boca Ciega High School, graduated in 1964. What drew to you archeology? I think it was in second grade, at Mount Vernon Elementary, we had a unit on Florida heritage. You study the state tree and the bird and all that, and we studied the Seminole Indians. I was really captivated. I thought, 'Hmm, that's the way to live.' I think that sort of predisposed me. When I was 8, my grandmother pulled out an old family trunk with an Indian arrowhead. That really fired up my imagination. Your work at the Topper site in South Carolina showed that humans existed in North America far earlier than previously thought. Why does that matter? People, just regular people, are extremely interested. ... I think it taps into a deep curiosity that humans have about their origins. I don't care whether you're in France or South Africa or South Carolina. Do you think the Topper site will be your greatest discovery or is that yet to come? I hope it is. Not just for our site, but for the sake of the program. The profession is slowly moving along to accept that there really were people here before the Clovis (roughly 13,000 years ago). The Topper site is unique ... it looks to me like it's the oldest radiocarbon site in North America. That's a huge statement. We're still working on it. Just to have literally found a site of that antiquity, the implications are just enormous. It does say, if it's that old, that people were getting into the United States the same time they were getting into Australia. That's part of that very old migration story. Literally, if it all works out, and I'm convinced that it will, obviously it will be the find of my lifetime. What's it like to now be the one that people come to listen to? It comes with the notoriety of the Topper site. ... People are curious about it and want to know what it is, and is it true? I try to cover that when I give these presentations. For me it's fun. It's pretty gratifying because I've always liked working with the public - especially amateur archeologists, since I started out as one. Heather Urquides can be reached at hurquides@sptimes.com or 892-2253. If you go What: Albert Goodyear talks about "Florida's First Peoples" When: 1 p.m. Saturday Where: Science Center, 7701 22nd Ave. N Details: Tickets are $6. For more information, go to www. sciencecenterofpinellas.com or call 384-0027.
[Last modified January 7, 2007, 01:37:07]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Dick
|
04/27/07 08:12 AM
|
|
This story tells you about archaeology in a very well presented way. PLEASE write more stories as I find them witty and interesting in a way that children and adults will both read!
|
|
by gerturd
|
04/27/07 08:06 AM
|
|
that is very pretty
|
|
by Isaac
|
01/19/07 10:38 AM
|
|
It makes sense that finds like this are occuring. Many of us Indigenous people believe we have always been on this continent. If scientists would listen to the natives more then this wouldn't be such a big find.
|
|
by Eadhmonn
|
01/16/07 07:20 AM
|
|
It's past due to shatter the myths of accepted theories of when ancient migrations took place, It isn't called "Topper" for nothing !!!
|
|
by Dennis
|
01/14/07 09:18 PM
|
|
Graham Hancock has made interesting and compeling arguements that human civilization has had eras of great advancement prior to the start of the last ice age. The advance of the ice age, and subsequent meltdown with all of the attendent cataclysim
|
|
by May
|
01/10/07 02:41 PM
|
|
Modern people have only been dated in Australia about 50K BP, which is thought to be the 1st place beyond Eurasia they went. Too early for America!
|
|
by Michelle
|
01/10/07 02:18 AM
|
|
Topper's got some real problems with provenience and radiocarbon dates; I'd like Goodyear to address it beyond stating "We're still working on it." Otherwise, it seems to be just another paleo site (albeit a cool one).
|
|
by Casey
|
01/09/07 11:34 PM
|
|
wow, what a find!!! i would like to see a follow up and more specifics on this..
|
|
by jack
|
01/09/07 07:53 AM
|
|
i would like a more indepth interview on such an importent find
|
|
by Craig
|
01/08/07 08:00 PM
|
|
I have been convinced for many years that people were in The Western Hemisphere much earlier than 13000 yrs ago. Sites in S.Amer. and other sites in N. Amer. have been showing this for some time.
|
|
by Roger
|
01/08/07 02:15 PM
|
|
Native American ancient cultures: Olmec, Chinchorro reached its pick in broadly the same period that Sumerian and Egyptians which means that it was an Universal psichological event, but they had to come much earlier than 13KBC in order to achieve it.
|
|
by Max
|
01/08/07 11:54 AM
|
|
No surprise that people lived in NA 50,000 years ago. Goodyear's findings reinforce other recent discoveries that disprove the foolish theory that all native Americans descented from people who crossed the Asian land bridge a mere 13,000 years ago.
|
|
by Ann
|
01/08/07 11:47 AM
|
|
It is very pleasing that archaeologist are beginning to accept pre Clovis dates. Someday soon the date of 50,000 years ago will be accepted for the settlement of the Americas. Maybe even earlier.
|
|
by rick
|
01/07/07 11:07 AM
|
|
there are other artifacts being found other places in the u.s. that although radio carbon dating has not been done, the style of stone tools being found certainly suggests preclovis occupations elsewhere such as tennessee and indiana. i found them.
|
|