St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Saving Florida from 'Big insurance'

Early edition

By JONI JAMES
Published January 8, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT

TALLAHASSEE — Gov. Charlie Crist pledged anew Monday to bring significant insurance rate relief to Florida policyholders during next week’s special session, saying, “Big insurance has a new day coming, and it starts the 16th.”

Crist has yet to say exactly how he would take on insurance companies or cut rates, and he warned to too  high expectations. “But people deserve high hopes,” he said, “and I have them.”

The first detailed proposal for the special session, unveiled Monday by the Florida Senate, includes a one-year rate freeze for customers of Citizens Property Insurance Corp.

But it includes no dramatic new insurance regulation, suggesting state leaders are less likely to make new demands of private companies to lower rates than they are to increase the risk homeowners  assume should Florida get hit by another round of whopper hurricanes.

The result: Policyholders, particularly customers of Citizens, could win a reprieve from skyrocketing insurance rates when lawmakers convene next week, but they also could take on more liability in the future.

“It’s pay me now or pay me later,” said Sam Miller, spokesman for the Florida Insurance Council, which has contended its members’ national profits don’t reflect the real risk in Florida’s market. “Reducing the pay me now and increasing the pay me later may be what we have to do’’ because of rising rates.

Insurance companies have warned significant new regulation could cause them to further retreat from their already diminishing role in Florida’s property insurance market.

The 153-page Florida Senate proposal — released 48 hours before either Crist’s or the House’s proposals are expected — is complex and wide ranging, addressing everything from strengthening the state’s building code to making it harder for insurance companies to appeal regulators’ rate rejections.

Companies are also required to offer more policy options, such as higher deductibles or policies without windstorm coverage, so that individual policy holders can choose a cheaper premium in exchange for assuming more risk –– if their mortgage company will let them.

The Senate plan does promise rate relief for customers of Citizens, the state-backed insurer of last resort. That’s now one-in-three Florida homeowners.

The plan would freeze premiums at the Dec. 31 rate, cancelling a routine rate hike that took effect Jan. 1 and another planned for March 1. Last spring, lawmakers ordered the second hike, an average 56-percent more in Citizens’ windstorm pool, to strengthen the pool’s fiscal outlook.

The Senate plan also proposes making it easier for insurers to buy reinsurance from the state, in exchange for passing any savings directly to consumers.

The proposal could provide rate relief for customers of Citizens and private insurance companies. Reinsurance is basically insurance for insurance companies.

But  should Citizens or the state’s reinsurance fund suffer deficit-causing losses as they did in 2004 and 2005, all Florida policyholders would be assessed to retire the deficit.

 House leaders generally have balked at the idea of putting more collective risk on all of Florida to provide coverage for properties on the state’s hurricane-risky shores. And they are expected to challenge the Senate’s strategy again.

But even Rep. Don Brown, R-DeFuniak Springs, who will oversee insurance legislation in the House, acknowledges political reality has changed the dynamic.

“Science is telling us rates are not high enough, and politics is telling us rates are too high. The paradox is they’re both true. There’s nothing you can say to convince policyholders rates aren’t high enough (already),” Brown said.

Times staff writer Jennifer Liberto, Tom Zucco and Steve Bousquet contributed to this report.

[Last modified January 8, 2007, 19:42:50]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Cookie 01/15/07 02:36 PM
WHY IS IT ALWAYS CITIZENS MENTIONED, OUR STATE FARM HAS A HUGE INCREASE WHICH INCLUDES PAYMENT ON THERE FOR CITIZENS. WHAT HAPPENS IN OTHER STATES WITH FIRES , MUDSLIDES, FLOODS, ICE STORMS WHY IS THERE NOT JUST A NATIONAL FUND.
by Shirley 01/09/07 01:08 PM
Our condo complex was insured for $39 million. One building burned. Tough our policy indicated that coverage was for all or one building, our 54 owners were left with a shortfall assessment of about 1 1/2 million...and we were forced into Citizens.
by claude 01/09/07 10:45 AM
Stop all new construction on the beach or in flood planes until there is a fix to the Ins crises. Make all those presently in the high risk areas pay the full cost of their coverage, just like we do with auto insurance, i.e. bad record, pay more.
by jim 01/09/07 08:27 AM
Floridas building commission flatly refuses to consider after market products designed to fortify existing building resistance to high wind damage. This leaves little obtion but to watch them blow away,rebuild at far exceeding cost to the homeowner.
by Nitty 01/09/07 08:11 AM
At the end of the day insurance companies even citizens are a business. We should just buy what we need.
by Brian 01/08/07 10:42 PM
It is not for the insured to guarantee profits for the insurers. Some profits from private insurers must be commited to being their own reinsurers. Why should they keep ALL the profits from last year and not reinsure themselves for the future now?
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT