Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
New York tops security grant distribution
The Homeland Security Department promises more accountability for $445-million in grants.
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published January 10, 2007
WASHINGTON - U.S. cities and regions will receive $445-million to help reduce the risk of terror attacks on ports, transit systems and chemical plants, Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff announced Tuesday. Recipients will have to submit detailed plans on how they will use the funds to protect critical sites, Chertoff said. "We're simply not going to give the money out without any accountability," Chertoff said, adding that this was being done to make sure the money "goes for the kinds of things the public expects." He touched on previous grant programs that were so broad they allowed cities to use allocations to pay for just about anything, including leather jackets. Nearly half the grant money, $201-million, would be used to secure ports and rail systems. The Port of New York and New Jersey would get the biggest share, $27.2-million. The Department of Homeland Security set aside $172-million to protect the nation's transit systems, with New York City and northern New Jersey getting the largest cut of $61-million. This year, money for rail and bus systems are combined, so recipients can decide which system needs more attention, Chertoff said. Transit funding this year includes 19 ferry systems in 14 regions in California, Connecticut, southern New Jersey and Delaware, northern New Jersey and New York, North Carolina, Texas, Virginia and Washington state. Intercity bus systems and trucking safety will each get $11.6-million. And the department set aside $48.5-million for "buffer zone protection" which would provide security around critical facilities such as chemical plants. Chertoff's announcement came as New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg complained during a Senate hearing that his city was long overdue in getting its fair share of antiterrorism grants. He compared the current system to spreading dollars "across the country like peanut butter." "For the sake of New York City and the security of our nation, I hope you will stop writing politically derived formulas into homeland security bills," Bloomberg told the Senate Homeland Security Committee, which is considering further legislation to enact recommendations of the 9/11 Commission. Sen. Charles Schumer, D-N.Y., remarked that the New York region was awarded a small boost in funding in this grant category from last fiscal year. "We're glad this is a modest increase in funding for New York, but we're still not close to our fair share of what we need," he said. Chertoff said he wanted to get away from the mind-set of officials comparing how much money they got from year to year. "We're investing resources where risk is greatest and where the funds will have the most significant impact," he said. Security grants: Cities qualifying as highest-risk status for Port Security Grants 1. New York-northern New Jersey 2. New Orleans 3. Houston-Galveston, Texas 4. Los Angeles-Long Beach, Calif. 5. Puget Sound (Seattle-Tacoma, Wash.) 6. Delaware Bay (Philadelphia, Wilmington, Del., and southern New Jersey) 7. San Francisco Bay area 8. Sabine-Neches River (Port Arthur-Beaumont, Texas) Cities qualifying as highest-risk status for Transit Security Grants 1. New York-Connecticut-northern New Jersey 2. Washington, D.C., and the Baltimore area 3. Boston 4. San Francisco Bay area 5. Chicago 6. Philadelphia 7. Greater Los Angeles 8. Atlanta . Fast facts Cities qualifying as highest-risk status for Port Security Grants 1. New York-northern New Jersey 2. New Orleans 3. Houston-Galveston, Texas 4. Los Angeles-Long Beach, Calif. 5. Puget Sound (Seattle-Tacoma, Wash.) 6. Delaware Bay (Philadelphia, Wilmington, Del., and southern New Jersey) 7. San Francisco Bay area 8. Sabine-Neches River (Port Arthur-Beaumont, Texas) Cities qualifying as highest-risk status for Transit Security Grants 1. New York-Connecticut-northern New Jersey 2. Washington, D.C., and the Baltimore area 3. Boston 4. San Francisco Bay area 5. Chicago 6. Philadelphia 7. Greater Los Angeles 8. Atlanta
[Last modified January 10, 2007, 01:32:55]
Share your thoughts on this story
|
News
Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
Print
Email story
Comment
Email editor
