St. Petersburg Times
Special report
Video report
  • For their own good
    Fifty years ago, they were screwed-up kids sent to the Florida School for Boys to be straightened out. But now they are screwed-up men, scarred by the whippings they endured. Read the story and see a video and portrait gallery.
  • More video reports
Multimedia report
Print Email this storyEmail story Comment Email editor
Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Your name Your email
Friend's name Friend's email
Your message
 

Politics

Is Obama too untried for White House bid?

As the Illinois senator heads toward a 2008 run, his lack of experience looms as an issue.

By BILL ADAIR
Published January 17, 2007


ADVERTISEMENT
photo
[Getty Images]
Sen. Barack Obama has only 10 years as an elected official.


WASHINGTON - Sen. Barack Obama is a bestselling author, a gifted orator and a star in the Democratic Party. But as he prepares to run for president, his political resume is a little thin.

Obama, who filed papers Tuesday to create a presidential exploratory committee, has only eight years in the Illinois Legislature and two in the U.S. Senate. Is he qualified for the nation's highest office?

Many Democrats think so. They say Obama is such a thoughtful, inspiring political leader that his lack of experience won't matter.

"He brings a freshness to Washington that would be very helpful," said Kris Schultz, a party activist serving as communications director for DraftObama.org, an independent group urging him to run.

Experience isn't all it's cracked up to be, Schultz said.

"We had one of the most experienced administrations in modern history with Vice President Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld and look what it brought us," she said.

But others question whether Obama, 45, has the necessary credentials, especially on foreign policy.

"I'm like a lot of other Democrats," said Steve Jarding, a strategist for Democratic candidates. "I'm intrigued. I really like this guy. But he's not been tested, he doesn't have the depth of experience, especially with foreign policy."

Obama said he is exploring a presidential run because be believes Washington needs fresh leadership.

"It's not the magnitude of our problems that concerns me the most. It's the smallness of our politics," he said in a speech that was e-mailed to supporters.

His message left little doubt that he would run, but he said he would make his official announcement on Feb. 10.

Obama, the son of a black African father and a white American mother, graduated from Columbia University with a political science degree. He got a law degree from Harvard Law School, where he was the first black president of the Law Review.

After law school, he directed a voter registration group, worked as a civil rights attorney and taught at the University of Chicago.

He was elected to the Illinois Senate in 1996 and then to the U.S. Senate in 2004.

Voters often say they want a president with experience, but it's a difficult concept to quantify.

Lyndon Johnson and Gerald Ford each had 24 years in Congress, plus experience in the military and each served briefly as vice president.

Others, such as Dwight Eisenhower and Ulysses S. Grant, had military experience, but had not served in elected office before they became president.

If you include Obama's eight years in the Illinois Senate and the four years he will have served in the U.S. Senate by the 2008 election, he would have a total of 12 years of elected experience, which would rank him just behind John F. Kennedy 13.

But pollsters and political strategists say experience as a governor or member of Congress probably matters more to voters than experience in a state legislature.

So if you remove Obama's time as a state senator, it would leave him with just four years in elected office, ranking him just behind George W. Bush and Theodore Roosevelt.

Karl Struble, a Democratic media consultant, said the number of years is not as important as whether Obama can convince voters he is ready for the White House.

"Having the judgment and intellect are far more important than having sat in a position of experience," Struble said.

Republican pollster Neil Newhouse said Obama can overcome his lack of experience with strong performances during interviews and presidential debates, especially on foreign affairs.

"For the most part, it can be erased by showing expertise, unless you come up against a guy like John McCain who has thick resume on these matters," Newhouse said.

Last fall, when Obama was asked on Meet the Press if he was ready to be president, he replied:

"Well, I'm not sure anybody is ready to be president before they're president. You know, ultimately, I trust the judgment of the American people that, in any election, they sort it through. And that's, you know, we have a long and rigorous process, and, you know, should I decide to run, if I ever did decide to run, I'm confident that I'd be run through the paces pretty good, including on Meet the Press."

Times researcher Angie Holan contributed to this report. Bill Adair can be reached at adair@sptimes.com or (202) 463-0575.

 

 

 

[Last modified January 17, 2007, 05:39:12]


Share your thoughts on this story

Comments on this article
by Randy 01/18/07 02:45 PM
George Washington had no previous experience. Gerald Ford was elected neither to the presidency OR vice-presidency, (only came in after the crook Agnew and later the crook Nixon), but ascended by Constitutional progression. Get a clue.
by Randy 01/18/07 02:33 PM
I first met Obama in the early 90's, as a member of the Steelworkers Union. He stood up for working people then, and he will do so now. Isn't it time the common worker has a voice, instead of being bullied by Bush's mafia? Let's tend to America first
by reza 01/17/07 07:51 PM
His mother was married to two Muslims, although he did eventually go to a Catholic school. Both Muslim father's were considered quite radical. He is supported by CAIR. We need to know more.
by jack s 01/17/07 03:46 PM
If experience is the defining criteria for choosing a president, why is Billary Clinton doing so well in the polls? people dont vote for experience, they vote for who they like and who says they will give the voter what they want. (the best liar)
by Frank 01/17/07 03:29 PM
If you compare his experience with Hillary, they run neck and neck. I would not include her stint as First Lady as experience and neither should she. After all she failed miserably as Bill's Healthcare guru. I think he could make it.
by truce 01/17/07 01:26 PM
It's amazing that we harp on political experience. Obama is a people person. He can talk to anyone in the world, and be listened to. He has the intelligence to listen carefully and thoughtfully, and learn. He is "normal". We need a "human" president.
by Gilbert 01/17/07 12:56 PM
Sen. Obama had the fortitude to vote NO, for the Iraq war. I am quite sure that he has the moxy to call it striaght and not be pig-headed. Is the US ready for the change is the question? Will he be allowed to use the front door or the back door?
by Steve 01/17/07 11:59 AM
Why aren't the same questions being asked about the other democrat front runner, Hilary Clinton? Apart from her Senate time, what experience would she bring to the office?
by Lisa 01/17/07 11:13 AM
My problem with Obama is that the only reason he wanted to win his last election was so he could run for president. He is too new and needs to get experience first.
by Marnie 01/17/07 10:51 AM
Was Abraham Lincoln too untried for his White House bid? In fact, Senator Obama has more experience than did Mr. Lincoln. Mr. Adair, please stop trying to tell American citizens how to think.
by Dennis 01/17/07 10:39 AM
Ideally I'd like someone with more experience, but experience is not everything. They mention foreign affairs experience, yet what experience did Bush have? State governors often run, and they have no foreign affairs experience.
by mark 01/17/07 10:18 AM
lack of experience or lack of political favors owed? i worry more about the democrats ability to field a support team for him. so far, he appears to have the backbone to do what's right instead of what's politicaly expedient,is not afraid to tell tru
by BILL 01/17/07 10:09 AM
A LOT OF US VOTED FOR AN "UNKNOWN" IN 2000. I THINK WE'VE LEARNED OUR LESSON. OF COURSE, SOME LIKE TO GAMBLE.
by Rany 01/17/07 09:12 AM
He's been in office for two years and knows nothing about national affairs, just talking points. He's just a media plant. God help us if our nation is stupid enough to elect him.
by Heather 01/17/07 08:57 AM
I agree that he is a bit too untried. But when you look at the others running for office...well.... But if you watch the national news, they are acting as if Mr. Obama has already won. Prove me wrong!
by Neo 01/17/07 06:55 AM
We need a long-distance runner not a sprinter at the White House. Maturation takes time; there is no way to speed it up. Just ask the vintners: older wines taste better.#
by fred 01/17/07 06:00 AM
Sen. Obama is more qualified than the current occupant and any other candidate.Questions is does America have the moral fiber to vote for ability rather than-a resume filled with failures.
by Olivier 01/17/07 02:44 AM
I hope and pray for Barack to get elected, first to democrat primaries and secondly to US presidency. There is no so called lack of experience for him. He's simply not compromised with the ruling mafia of GW Bush.
by Kathy 01/17/07 02:08 AM
We have only started to hear about Obama for the last year. Where was he before? I don't know, others wonder, where did he come from and what good can he do? I like him, but am leary of a nobody thats turned into a somebody overnight.
Subscribe to the Times
Click here for daily delivery
of the St. Petersburg Times.

Email Newsletters

ADVERTISEMENT