Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Columns
Year of Lee sounds bugles of history, race
By ANDREW SKERRITT
Published January 19, 2007
Before he showed up for class at Pasco High Thursday morning, history teacher Dean Leferink had some family business to address. Leferink, commander of the Gen. Jubal A. Early, Camp 556, Sons of Confederate Veterans, drove to Tampa to accept a proclamation from the Hillsborough County Commission declaring 2007 as the Year of Lee. Today, Jan. 19, would have been the Confederate commander Gen. Robert E. Lee's 200th birthday. This symbolic act is loaded with potential land mines. As I walked into the second floor commission boardroom to watch the brief ceremony, a local gadfly warned me to stay away. "They're going to honor Robert E. Lee," she said. "Sure you want to go in there?" That isolated question captures the struggle facing Leferink and those who are committed to honoring the heritage of the Confederacy. Lee, as Leferink sees it, was the "Knight of Knights," the "last Christian warrior," the noblest symbol of the Confederate cause. All these years and wars later, and even as our soldiers fight in Iraq, it is Lee who epitomizes the American warrior, duty, loyalty, honor. For many, he is the ultimate American icon. But to African-Americans and many Northerners, Lee is inextricably linked with a dubious cause - slavery. To us, the stars and bars flag of the Confederacy still represents racism, Jim Crow and oppression. It still provokes raw emotion, like rubbing salt into an open wound. After Leferink left the meeting, an African-American got up and denounced the Lee proclamation. Still, where others see hate, Leferink insists there's heritage; where others see slavery as the cause of the War between the States, Leferink points to states' rights. And there is no mistaking Leferink's sincerity and passion, both as a student and teacher of American history. His fascination with history dates back to seventh grade in Louisiana and a school trip to the site of the Battle of Vicksburg in Mississippi. His great-great-grandfather, Pierre Carriere, fought with Confederate troops at the Battle of Port Hudson. That siege ended soon after the Union victory at Vicksburg on July 4, 1863. Leferink's ancestor, a dirt poor sharecropper, survived the war and lived to old age. Unfortunately, peace didn't bring an end to conflict in the old Confederacy. One of the tragedies of the post Civil War era is the failure of poor Southern whites to find common cause with newly freed slaves. That simmering feud no doubt still influences the way we view the Civil War, how we decide the good guys and the bad guys. History has decided where Leferink's loyalties lie. He's an avid Civil War re-enactor. This weekend, even as he turns 47, he'll suit up in gray and head for the Brooksville Raid in Hernando County. But during the week, you'll find him at Pasco High, where he has taught history for the last 15 years. In the classroom, he challenges his students' established notions about heroes and villains. "I try to crush myths," he said. President Lincoln is one of his favorite targets; Lee's legacy is untouchable. But it makes you wonder, what if Lee's army had won at Gettysburg? Chances are I wouldn't be writing this column, and Jan. 19 would definitely be a national holiday. Andrew Skerritt can be reached at (813) 909-4602 or toll-free at 1-800-333-7505, ext. 4602. His e-mail address is askerritt@sptimes.com.
[Last modified January 19, 2007, 05:54:32]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Lee
|
06/08/07 07:02 PM
|
|
hello my name is Jonathan Lewis Lee Muniz and my race is about this general lee is my great,great,great,great grandfather and i was born in puerto rico and theres a lot of black people and im not a racist you just have to be thinking not to be racist
|
|
by Gladys
|
01/21/07 01:38 PM
|
|
Everyone seems to be pointing their fingers at slavery in the South. What about slavery in the North? Where did many of the slaves in the South come from? Yes, the North, and that includes New England from whence came John Brown and his supporters.
|
|
by Ailene
|
01/21/07 01:28 PM
|
|
Gen. Lee was not a hyprocrite. He freed all of his wife's slaves during the war. If you research and study his life, you'll find he was a true and honorable christian man. Tom, what about General Grant who also owned slaves and led the Union Army??
|
|
by Ailene
|
01/21/07 01:22 PM
|
|
Gen. Robert E. Lee was a Virginian first and foremost. He led the Army of Viginia only because he was a virginian and VIrginia secceded from the union of states. Prior to that time, he had been asked to lead the Union (Federal).
|
|
by Ken
|
01/20/07 01:23 PM
|
|
Battle Flag was not the stars and bars. Lee was a great man who abhored slavery. And it would have been obsolete by 1870 if the South would have won. Jeff Davis even said that it was a dinosaur and needed to end. Lincoln didn't like the Negro race.
|
|
by Tom
|
01/20/07 11:41 AM
|
|
Typical. A bunch of crackers want to honor one man and forget about the enslavement and death of millions. That fact that Lee "abominated" slavery (according to one), but fought on the side that would preserve it, is the definition of hypocrisy.
|
|
by rick
|
01/20/07 06:56 AM
|
|
In what was otherwise a fair and balanced story Andrew Skerritt just had to throw a rock at Lee in the end by suggesting that he would not be writing the story if the Soouth had won. Maybe Andrew should visit Deans history class and get an education.
|
|
by Marion
|
01/19/07 09:14 PM
|
|
Lee was a man of impecable character, the likes of which, haven't been on the American scene since his death. That any should not honour his memory speaks to the sorry state of our society & culture. Those naysayers need history 101 and a faith.
|
|
by Sal
|
01/19/07 08:33 PM
|
|
A recent study says there is more slavery in the world today than ever before. Slavery in the US was wrong but it was also short lived and not really widespread.
|
|
by James
|
01/19/07 03:09 PM
|
|
Robert E. Lee was a great American both as a Christian,Patriot & Military Leader. He was a man of great morals & principle. Thanks for a great article which highlights his 200th birthday. Lee served as an example of reconciliation, so to should we
|
|
by Bart
|
01/19/07 01:25 PM
|
|
Slavery ended in the US because it was no longer profitable for Northern industrialists. Good people, including General Lee, thought it was an abomination of humanity. It still exists in the Sudan. Where's the outrage?
|
|
by Another FL native
|
01/19/07 11:45 AM
|
|
If Lee had won and slavery had continued he would be one of history's worst criminals. And I say that as a person whose family has been in Florida since the 1840's.
|
|
by Jerry
|
01/19/07 10:57 AM
|
|
Good job. Good, and surprisingly fair, artical from the Times.
|
|
by Florida Native
|
01/19/07 08:39 AM
|
|
Today marks the 200th birthday of one of the greatest leaders this country has ever known- a man or high morals, leadership, love for common man and of country. What a sad comment it is on our culture that I am afraid to post my our name in tribute.
|
|
by Jimmy
|
01/19/07 08:34 AM
|
|
No, you would be writing this column. Talent is a valuable asset in southern culture and you sir have talent. Great article!
|
|
by Michael
|
01/19/07 08:31 AM
|
|
Gen. Robert E Lee was a better man than that farce called "Dr" Martin Luther King! The Civil War was not about Slavery, most of the Confederate soldiers never even saw a slave, and let alone the 3500 free blacks that fought for the South!!!!!!!!
|
|
by daphne
|
01/19/07 08:05 AM
|
|
we are all the sum of all our experences. That is true of this country also. Yes the slave years are a national shame, but we need to get beyond that place. Slavery is part of our national history, not the whole of it. we need to quit holding a grudg
|
|