Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Not everyone happy with Bush's speech
By ASSOCIATED PRESS
Published January 25, 2007
WASHINGTON - On the day after came the grumbling. The White House warned for days ahead of President Bush's State of the Union address that changed conditions demanded a speech stripped of the usual laundry list of proposals designed to please loyal constituencies. Still, disappointment abounded Wednesday. Religious groups heard no mention of banning same-sex marriage, preventing expanded embryonic stem cell research or pursuing tougher abortion laws. When the president urged the Democratic-controlled Congress to vote on his judicial nominees, he left out his usual statement that he picks those who "strictly interpret the Constitution" - a signal he is committed to nominees conservatives would like. Such issues were benched in favor of a focus on a nemesis issue for the right, immigration changes that could create a path to citizenship for illegal immigrants. "We're disappointed that he didn't mention cultural issues at all," said Rich Lowry, editor of National Review magazine. "Everyone realizes that this is a product of his diminished circumstances." But Democrats were disheartened on the day after, too, saying Bush brought up "the serious challenge of global climate change" almost parenthetically.
[Last modified January 25, 2007, 05:53:28]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Sam
|
01/26/07 03:32 AM
|
|
I could care less about Bush's SOTU speech.
But I sure like Senator Jim Webb's rebuttal. He made Bush look like the delusional wimp he is. BTW, Senator Webb is a real war hero, earning the Navy Cross, Silver Star, 2 Bronze Stars and 2 Purple Hearts.
|
|