Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Katrina dogs case back to court
By DEMORRIS A. LEE
Published January 29, 2007
ST. PETERSBURG — The legal saga over ownership of two dogs rescued and adopted out after Hurricane Katrina returned to court Monday, with the sides trying to resolve several issues before the scheduled April trial.
By day’s end, Circuit Judge Henry Andringa dismissed one claim by the defense, and is expected to rule on other motions in the next few days.
Steven and Dorreen Couture, of St. Bernard Parish, La., filed suit in July to reclaim two dogs displaced during the hurricane and adopted out to Hillsborough Prosecutor Pam Bondi and Rhonda Rineker of Dunedin. The suit also names the Humane Society of Pinellas, which adopted out the dogs.
The Coutures eventually tracked the dogs — a St. Bernard and a shepherd mix — to Tampa Bay. But by then, Bondi had adopted the St. Bernard and Rineker the shepherd mix.
Bondi has argued that the St. Bernard was sick and improperly cared for; Rineker contended she adopted an abandoned dog in good faith.
On Monday, Andringa dismissed one of Rineker’s defense claims that she was a bona fide purchaser for value of the shepherd mix, and didn’t know the Coutures had an interest in the dog.
In court documents, Murray Silverstein, who represents the Coutures, said, “Because Rineker neither paid a value in acquiring plaintiffs’ dog Nila nor adopted the dog without notice of the plaintiffs’ adverse interest, there are no legal grounds for her third affirmative defense and same must be dismissed as a matter of law.”
Silverstein said the judge’s decision leaves only the defensive claim that the Coutures abandoned the dogs. But Jeff Brown, who represents Rineker, said Andringa’s decision doesn’t mean the points can’t be argued at trial, and he “absolutely” will raise them.
Brown later argued the Coutures’ suit should be dismissed because the Humane Society had police powers over the dogs, that the shelter has the authority to become the owner of an animal once it is impounded. He said after an attempt to contact the original owners is made in 10 days, the shelter has the right to adopt out the dog or have it euthanized. Silverstein said there is no proof the Humane Society made an attempt to contact the Coutures.
Andringa didn’t rule on Brown’s motion for dismissal.
The Coutures were in court Monday, making the trip from Louisiana with their two grandchildren. “I never expected this to go on like this,” Steven Couture said after the hearing. “But I’m never giving up. They’re my dogs.”
[Last modified January 29, 2007, 20:34:52]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Ceily
|
02/03/07 02:03 PM
|
|
So, according to Mr. Brown, any humane society can leave its own jurisdiction, go to another state, remove animals and "legally" adopt them out? Sounds like theft to me, especially since the Coutures never abandoned their pets!
|
|
by Sandra
|
02/01/07 06:09 PM
|
|
One way they COULD have reached dozens of families about the location of their pets was via the Web and they chose to omit that critical step. That's just unethical.
|
|
by Evelyn
|
02/01/07 03:49 PM
|
|
The Humane society tried to contact the Coutures how? By phone? Oops, no phone service. By mail? Oh yeah, no mail delivery. As an officer of the courts Biondi should be ashamed and pershaps prosecuted for misuse of public office.
|
|
by Magoo
|
01/31/07 06:16 AM
|
|
The saddest part is that there are still so many pets who were "misadopted" out by Shelters all over the country IN SPITE of the Katrina families attempts to reclaim their beloved companions AND then the selfish "adopters" who refuse to reunite them!
|
|
by Linda Walker
|
01/30/07 01:14 PM
|
|
These dogs need to be returned to their rightful owners - the Coutures who have lost everything and who NEVER abandoned those animals. The Humane Society had no right to adopt out these animals permanently - these were not normal circumstances.
|
|
by Heidi
|
01/30/07 12:57 PM
|
|
Please give these people their dogs back. Please.
|
|
by Josie
|
01/30/07 12:37 PM
|
|
All things are possible but all things are not profitable. Bondi and Rineker it is not profitable to keep these dogs. Give them back while you still have a little dignity left.Stop hurting the Couture's and their grandchildren. ENOUGH IS ENOUGH!!!!!!
|
|
by Bobbi
|
01/30/07 12:09 PM
|
|
Anyone who was in New Orleans after Katrina and tried to say the Coutours "abandoned" their dogs would have to rethink their position. These people went through hell and had to make unthinkable choices. They should have their dogs back immediately.
|
|
by Sher
|
01/30/07 10:39 AM
|
|
Enough already, haven't these people been through enough!!!!! GIVE THEM BACK THEIR DOGS..........
|
|
by Patt
|
01/30/07 08:17 AM
|
|
Nila and Tank had an Id. number from Camp Lucky saying they were owned by Steven Couture even had an address where they lived. It is obvious who the owners are please give them back to their owners in N.O. Be kind and give them back.
|
|
by Sandra
|
01/30/07 08:01 AM
|
|
Grace, the C's took the dogs themselves to a temp. shelter for safekeeping.But paperwork marked as "owned" so shelter, Rhonda, and Pam never had good title. No evidence that HS put effort into finding owners; they never posted dog's pix on the Web.
|
|
by Di
|
01/30/07 05:20 AM
|
|
Give them back their dogs already!
|
|
by Kim
|
01/30/07 12:48 AM
|
|
The dogs will go back to LA. It is like adoption. You adopt a child legally then the family wants it back. You give it back. You can fight but you lose.
|
|
by Grace
|
01/29/07 11:59 PM
|
|
First, you can't purchase stolen property. In any state!
Also, these dogs cannot be covered by the "stray" laws...these dogs were not strays found on the streets. They were animals that were removed by force from homes, technically stolen!
|
|
by tarpon
|
01/29/07 11:14 PM
|
|
So let me get this right--you're in the worst disaster to ever hit this country; you manage to get your pets to safety; it takes 3 months to find them & you can't get them back! And how much is this costing we local taxpayers!!!
|
|
by Pat
|
01/29/07 10:24 PM
|
|
AGAIN the family's actions speak loud and clear. AGAIN they drive to FL to see their beloved dogs and attend another senseless court date. Aren't Rineker and Bondi about out of ideas? Jeff Brown needs to find another outlet to advertise free.
|
|
by Margaret
|
01/29/07 10:21 PM
|
|
Please look up Deuteronomy 22:1-2.
The answer to this problem is spelled out there. Not enough room to post here.
|
|