Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Crist wants touch-screen voting machines gone
By STEVE BOUSQUET
Published January 31, 2007
TALLAHASSEE — Eager to end six troublesome years of touch screen voting in Florida, Gov. Charlie Crist wants every county to switch to paper ballots by 2008. Crist will ask the Legislature to spend more than $30-million to replace touch screens with an optical scan system that allows a voter to mark an oval next to a candidate’s name before slipping a ballot into an electronic reader — the same way absentee ballots are cast.
The change would affect a majority of the state’s voters living in 15 mostly urban counties, including Pinellas, Hillsborough and Pasco.
Crist will travel today to Palm Beach County, home of the disgraced “butterfly ballot” that in 2000 became a symbol of electoral ineptitude.
Accompanied by Secretary of State Kurt Browning and U.S. Rep. Robert Wexler, a Democrat and a vocal critic of touch screen voting, Crist will endorse the change in voting systems while offering the money to pay for it.
“I think it’s important to make sure people have confidence in our voting system,” Crist said Wednesday. “If there’s a need for a recount, I think it’s important that we have something to recount.”
Supporters of optical scan voting say it is more certain to reflect a voter’s intent because it creates a paper record of every ballot.
In a touch screen system, a voter receives a card and inserts it into an ATM-like machine and touches the screen to record choices. The card is sent to the supervisor of elections, where the choices are downloaded and counted.
No tangible record exists.
Crist’s eagerness to junk touch-screen voting comes amid a continuing furor over the high number of undervotes in a close Congressional election in Sarasota conducted with touch-screen machines.
The lack of a paper audit trail has frustrated efforts to conduct a manual recount. The trailing candidate, Democrat Christine Jennings, filed a lawsuit asking for another vote.
Reaction to the Crist plan Wednesday was cautious.
Pinellas County uses two massive optical scan machines to process absentee and provisional ballots. The bulk of the voting during a county-wide election takes place on 3,400 touch screen machines.
Pinellas County Supervisor of Elections spokeswoman Nancy Whitlock said she was reluctant to comment on Crist’s proposal before the governor makes his announcement.
But Whitlock said that if touch screens were replaced with optical scanners, vote counting would take much longer. She said that under federal election rules, each polling place must have a touch screen to serve the disabled.
In 2001, Pinellas spent $14-million to buy an electronic voting system, much of it spent toward buying touch screen machines. Whitlock said the county would have to consider selling its touch screens, perhaps to a jurisdiction in another state, to avoid a financial loss.
Pasco County Supervisor of Elections Brian Corley said transparency and security are key points.
“It’s no secret Florida ... has been a lightning rod of controversy,” Corley said. “There seems to be the will of the people to move toward paper trails. If that would satisfy the people, then I would support it.”
Some voting-system watchdogs expressed skepticism about what they see as a hasty decision by the new governor.
The American Civil Liberties Union said Crist’s impulse to scrap touch screen units and replace them with optical scanners was “too quick.” The ACLU said it was concerned with the impact on voters who do not speak English or have physical disabilities.
On the other hand, the activist group People for the American Way called Crist’s plan “a strong first step” and said touch screen machines “have caused too many problems in Florida.’’
Leon County Supervisor of Elections Ion Sancho, a fierce critic of touch screens, also hailed the move. Sancho said Crist is following the recommendation of an elections task force made six years ago after the hanging-chad fiasco of the presidential recount. The task force urged that all 67 counties be required to switch to optical scan voting, but lawmakers left the choice up to each county.
One lobbyist wore two hats, representing counties and a voting machine vendor. The Florida Association of Counties received cash commissions in return for endorsing machines sold by Election Systems & Software of Omaha, Neb. The result, Sancho said, was a politically-motivated, lobbyist-influenced decisions by some counties to switch to touch screen technology.
“We dumbed down the process to accommodate technology that has limited capacity to be audited,” Sancho said. “That was simply the wrong way to go.”
The 15 touch screen counties are Pinellas, Hillsborough, Pasco, Miami-Dade, Broward, Palm Beach, Charlotte, Collier, Duval, Indian River, Lake, Lee, Martin, Sarasota and Sumter.
Times Staff writers Will Van Sant and David DeCamp contributed to this report. Steve Bousquet can be reached at bousquet@sptimes.com or (850) 224-7263.
[Last modified February 2, 2007, 19:57:00]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by shirley O'Dell
|
05/06/07 10:27 AM
|
|
I have gone to Biloxi for gambling, until Katrina hit, every month for 3 days. Many Floridians go, by plane, bus or drive there. Look at all the revenue the State of Fl. could be receiving to help our taxes. Why let the Indian Res. get all this $$
|
|
by Jim
|
03/04/07 11:13 AM
|
|
The card inserted by the voter is not sent to SOE! Get the process right if you want to report on it. And anyone that thinks touch screens are difficult to use must really have fun trying to read the ballot when any issues are on it!
|
|
by Ben
|
02/14/07 04:03 PM
|
|
Hurray. Finally a voice of reason. The cost of converting is not the issue. It is the money wasted in the rush to be bought by electronic voting industry lobbyists that is irresponsible.
|
|
by Doug
|
02/05/07 10:43 AM
|
|
Whatever the voting process in place, there has to be an audit trail so that any possible errors can be corrected. Without an audit trail, any mistakes or intentional fraud could not be detected. A paper trail must be in place. Crist is correct.
|
|
by Shirl
|
02/04/07 11:37 AM
|
|
It doesn't matter if he is Republican or democrat, he is a wise man and should be commended for making a change such as this, as it is long overdue. Crist is doing the right thing for the people, as was Sancho in the past.Hope all follow his leed.
|
|
by Jonnie
|
02/03/07 08:48 AM
|
|
We all know Crist is a Republican but only by name, the democrats are the ones who cried and cried to have the voting machines, and now all we hear from the Democrats is how bad they are when they loose. Same doublespeak and hypocrites.
|
|
by Jonnie
|
02/03/07 08:43 AM
|
|
The only card the election officials have at the voting center is the supervisor card, which allows a poll supervisor to open the election and close the election... Lucas another person who does not know what he is talking about.
|
|
by Jonnie
|
02/03/07 08:39 AM
|
|
LUCAS you cannot void the votes on the machine without a central admin supervisors card and password, and no one at the election had that card it is stored at the circuit clerks office, under lock.
|
|
by Alwin
|
02/03/07 07:21 AM
|
|
Polk county has been using optical readers for a hand marked ballot with no problems that I have heard of.
|
|
by Nilah
|
02/02/07 11:14 PM
|
|
Yes please throw out the touch screen.It has been nothing but a headache.We are the retirement state we don't need to be making things harder for our seniors.As a conservative i think we are relying to much on satelite and computer technology.
|
|
by frank
|
02/02/07 05:21 PM
|
|
optical scanning won't deter those with physical disabilities, many have someone
with them while voting.
The "Real-Plus" side of this, is a PAPER TRAIL. Something most everyone wants !
|
|
by Jeff
|
02/02/07 01:37 PM
|
|
Up here where I live in Canada all we use is optical readers. You then take you completed ballot to the machine and an election worker inserts it. Instantly counted. All results are then tallied and any recounts only take a few hours to complete
|
|
by Lucas H Hardy
|
02/02/07 01:30 PM
|
|
The Diebold TS series is absurdly easy to tamper with. You don't even need to hack it. Just breaking the seal over the memory card compartment is enough to cause a conscientious elections official to void all votes it recorded.
|
|
by mikem
|
02/02/07 01:01 PM
|
|
why not have the touch screen along with a print out duplicate copies one they get initialed by the voter. If there is a question on a count it can be checked.With the voter having a copy even Jeb and G.W. COULDN'T FIX THE ELECTION NOT EVEN K. HARRIS
|
|
by Steve
|
02/02/07 12:43 PM
|
|
I love the touch screens. I always get to review my vote and see the actual paper trail. If there are security issues, fix the security. Changing the system to manual or optical readers only provides further opportunity for fraud.
|
|
by Marion
|
02/02/07 12:04 PM
|
|
Crist is a Republican not a Democrat as stated in the article headline. Of course, we won't know how he will be voting untill he is in office for a while.
|
|
by Mike
|
02/02/07 10:57 AM
|
|
Paul the only problem with your analogy of the under votes is, the voting machine on the summery page shows that you did not vote for that race in big red letters. And gives you the opportunity to correct it. You cant spin the truth to professionals
|
|
by Mike
|
02/02/07 10:46 AM
|
|
Every time you spin news article about hacking a machine you are calling our election officials Criminals. No hacker can do what has been reported on a machine during Election Day. Without inside help from election officias.Like marking paper ballots
|
|
by Mike
|
02/02/07 10:40 AM
|
|
Tsx machines run properly are a way that no one can cheat on elevtions. Over voting has been a major problem in elections and now there are undervotes no one can fill in you wont to band the closest thing to perfect elections we have.
|
|
by Mike
|
02/02/07 10:37 AM
|
|
The reason the touch screen was brought about to keep people like you from filling in under vote for the canidate you like. The TSX was created to stop over votes, and 99% of all media reports about the TSX are lies. spun by democrats sore loosers.
|
|
by marcia
|
02/02/07 10:25 AM
|
|
my son lives in florida and i used to live there but in our county in Alabama we have the optical system and it works great - one of the most accurate systems on the market and you certainly have a clear paper trail in case a recount is needed -
|
|
by Staley
|
02/02/07 10:11 AM
|
|
We have used the optical scan system here for many years, and I think they should be the national standard. They're easy to use and understand, the ballot is verified before the voter leaves the polling place, and counting is fast and flawless.
|
|
by IMS
|
02/02/07 10:08 AM
|
|
The entire country should go this route. So What if it takes much longer, at least it would be accurate. Sell the touch screens to counties in the USA who need one to serve the disabled.
|
|
by Marius
|
02/02/07 09:54 AM
|
|
Governor Crist is Republican not a Democrat.
|
|
by Ron
|
02/02/07 09:53 AM
|
|
This problem could be solved by allowing only Democrats to be on any ballot. They just don't accept the fact that Good Americans have been driven out of their party and only the complainers remain.
|
|
by ken
|
02/02/07 09:49 AM
|
|
It seems to me that the Democrats want yet another voting scheme to hide the fact that people in Florida are too dumb to follow instructions (ie. punch chads) or too illiterate to read. And people laugh at South Carolina!
|
|
by Lee
|
02/02/07 09:38 AM
|
|
It's funny that the touch screens work just fine when the Dems win elections.
|
|
by Phyllis
|
02/02/07 09:37 AM
|
|
I love the touch screens. They are very simple to use and you have the oppoutunity to change your vote at the end before you submit it. What could be better - except that it is also much quicker. You are in and out in no time.
|
|
by Terryl
|
02/02/07 09:37 AM
|
|
There's obviously something wrong if liberals lose. It certainly couldn't be because of the power and control they seek to remake America in their own image.
|
|
by Larry
|
02/02/07 09:36 AM
|
|
I have participated in the manual recount of scanner ballots. The results showed that the manual count picked up votes that the scanner missed. I faint mark will be missed by the scanner. A manual count is the most accurate.
|
|
by Paula
|
02/02/07 09:28 AM
|
|
Sounds like a great idea. Question: why do we allow those who don't read or speak English to vote? If I move to Mexico and have a baby, will I get citizenship there? Will I be allowed to vote there? Will ballots be in English?
|
|
by George
|
02/02/07 09:23 AM
|
|
Just a thought! My bank has a touch-screen. I get the money, they have a record. Wal-Mart has a self check-out
using a touch screen, in English or Spanish, they have a record. Am I missing something here?
|
|
by Donna
|
02/02/07 09:22 AM
|
|
We are moving back in time.. the computer and the optical scanner and touch screen are what needs to be used; and you have a paper trail. I worked at a polling place; and it's great - don't go backwards Governor.
|
|
by Eric
|
02/02/07 09:11 AM
|
|
This is the way to do it. I've voted on optical paper ballots for years. They are easy to follow, easy to use, easy to count, and there is a paper trail. Why do we need digital voting?
|
|
by Troy
|
02/02/07 09:09 AM
|
|
I love how people blame Democrats for complaining when they lose. I believe it was the REPUBLICANS that took up he fight to stop the recount in 2000. Bush would have won anyway, and I ca live with that, but don't just blame democrats.
|
|