Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Fasano acts after bar ejects
By Leonora LaPeter
Published February 6, 2007
State Sen. Mike Fasano, who said he has never had an alcoholic drink, has often been a designated driver for friends. So he can relate to Gary Maujean's predicament. In June, Maujean said, he was ejected from Carlie's Lounge in Pinellas Park for not buying alcohol. Maujean, who builds doors for a living, was the designated driver for his wife and their friends. Now Fasano, R-New Port Richey, has filed a bill that would prevent bar owners from throwing out patrons who don't buy alcohol. The new bill would slip mistreatment of designated drivers in with discrimination based on race, sex and creed and could affect an establishment's license. "I was outraged," said Fasano, who once crusaded for a coral-colored license plate for repeat drunken drivers. "Here you have an individual who is trying to be responsible, and he's being thrown out of the bar because he wanted a Coke rather than a rum and Coke." Maujean, 37, had been going to Carlie's Lounge for about 15 years. He met his wife there. But on the night of June 2, he said in police reports and a lawsuit, the bar's new owner, Vincenzo Romano, came up to him and told him he would have to leave if he wasn't going to drink. Maujean said his wife and friends had ordered several alcoholic drinks and food. He had also ordered a Coke. Maujean has epilepsy, so he can't drink and typically serves as the designated driver. Maujean said Romano pulled him by the arm to go outside: "He gets up in my face, and he said, 'All you had was Coke and water. I got employees to pay and a band I got to pay, and either drink something or get the hell out of the bar.' I told him again I was the designated driver." Maujean said Romano pulled the exit door open and slammed it into Maujean as he walked back inside. Maujean said he put his arms up to protect himself, but it hit him in the forehead and arm. Then, he said, a bouncer, Stanley J. Clark, tackled him from behind. Maujean called for an ambulance and police. He was taken to a hospital and treated. He pursued charges against Romano and Clark. But prosecutors decided not to charge the two men because, they said, "the case cannot be proven beyond a reasonable doubt." Romano could not be reached for comment. His 18-year-old son, Vincent, said his father just had major surgery and was not available. However, in past interviews, Romano has denied Maujean's accusations. "That's totally a lie," he said in August. "The customer was falling asleep at the bar." Carlie's Lounge celebrated its first anniversary under new ownership during the weekend with a toga party. The dispute over the rights of a designated driver has forged common ground between Maujean's attorney, Tom Carey, and Fasano, a high school dropout from New York who moved to Pasco County in the 1970s. "A bar shouldn't be able to eject a patron for this," said Carey, a Clearwater lawyer who lost his wife to a drunken driver 24 years ago and now often represents victims of drunken drivers. (He also asked Fasano to sponsor a bill that would give a judge discretion to seize a person's car if the person is charged with drunken driving three times or more.) Maujean racked up $5,000 in medical bills from the incident, Carey said. Fasano hopes to get the designated driver bill passed during the next legislative session, which begins March 6. State Rep. Bill Heller has signed on as a House sponsor. "I will tell you, the incident in which the gentleman throws out another because he is a designated driver, that happens once in a blue moon. It's very rare," Fasano said. "But it should never happen again."
[Last modified February 6, 2007, 00:17:37]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by CHRISSY
|
05/17/07 02:19 AM
|
|
I WORKED AT CARLIES FOR 3 YRS. B4 RAMONOS BOUGHT. I BELIEVE THOSE OWNERS HAVE THE TENDENCIES TO USE THESE TYPES OF TACTICS TO GET WHAT THEY WANT.THIER POOR CHOICES SEEM TO BE A RESULT OF A CONSTANT NEED TO BE IN CONTROL.
|
|
by Judy
|
05/08/07 01:10 AM
|
|
This bar owner is an idiot.The people who came with Maujean I'm sure spent a lot of money on food & drinks as well as a tip that would have made up for his not drinking.I think more people would go out if they had someone reliable to drive them home.
|
|
by Jean
|
02/13/07 06:01 PM
|
|
I thought drunks were the ones to be ran out up by owners NOT sober patrons who drive others who wish to drink at the bar home. Carlis's owner is an idiot. Causing injury to this nice young man. Mr. Maujean I hope you win your case.
|
|
by aimee
|
02/11/07 09:39 PM
|
|
i dated the owners son and i was really close with the family and i know for a fact that they vinny sr would never do anything like that.
|
|
by Marie
|
02/09/07 11:00 AM
|
|
If a business has the right to eject a customer if they don't spend enough, will I get kicked out of Publix if I only buy candy bar? Not likely. I don't think businesses have the right to extort money.
|
|
by heidi
|
02/08/07 07:05 PM
|
|
If it is true that the victim and his party had purchased food,soda, and the other patrons in the group were purchasing alcoholic bevrages; not only would the business owner have to be a complete idiot, he also deserves to lose his liquor liscence.
|
|
by Bear
|
02/08/07 06:12 PM
|
|
Luke, while that is true the owner was not within his rights to physically accost the guy, not to mention it's really bad for business
|
|
by Roy
|
02/07/07 04:07 PM
|
|
Revoke the Bars liquor license and send a message that other businesses will clearly understand
|
|
by johnny
|
02/07/07 12:05 AM
|
|
i'm a former bar owner. no sane bar owner would do this. there is something else going on here. perhaps a shakedown attempt by the "victim." that, i can assure you, happens all the time.
|
|
by stan dup
|
02/07/07 12:03 AM
|
|
CC would prosecute but settle out....But Romano will be prohibited to ever own or run a business in Florida.
That's fair!
|
|
by Marie
|
02/06/07 09:01 PM
|
|
Luke,if the owner operates a business that sells alcohol,food and beverages and he can't make money when one person doesn't buy alcohol,he must be a rotten businessman.
|
|
by K
|
02/06/07 08:00 PM
|
|
Had this gentleman then ordered and drank an alcoholic beverage, would the bar owner be responsible for any subsequent DUI or accident? Seems he should if he is allowed to essentially force people to drink.
|
|
by Carolyn
|
02/06/07 06:06 PM
|
|
I just read comment by "Luke" guess he's a patron of this bar and drives after drinking. Mr. Policeman lookout for Luke he wants to drive home after drinking. Second thought EVERYONE LOOK OUT FOR DRIVING AFTER DRINKING LAW BREAKER LUKE.
|
|
by Jean
|
02/06/07 05:58 PM
|
|
What kind of officials do we have to let these men off with assaulting this non-drinking young man. Is anyone talking up a collection to help him pay his medical bills? I'd like to contribute a few dollars we must stand up to our officials.
|
|
by Clara
|
02/06/07 05:40 PM
|
|
I pray that Gary Maujean will get reimbursted for what this bar did to him and the bar should be CLOSED forever! I cannot belive that they were demanding someone to drink. Is this not against the law already to force someone to drink?
|
|
by Eula
|
02/06/07 05:38 PM
|
|
This is crazy that in todays times we want anyone that goes to a bar to be responsible and this guy was be responsible and the bar wanted to do this to him. THE BAR should have to pay and pay big!
|
|
by Karen
|
02/06/07 02:48 PM
|
|
So are we to ask designated drivers to wait in the car all night?
|
|
by Luke
|
02/06/07 09:13 AM
|
|
The owner operates a business, not a charity. He did not "discriminate" based upon any legally prohibited criteria and was fully within his rights. If he cannot make money having a particular customer there, he is free to require them to leave.
|
|