Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Doctor: Execution flawed at start
It is not known if Angel Diaz suffered any pain during the botched execution.
By CHRIS TISCH
Published February 13, 2007
TAMPA - A doctor told a panel reviewing Florida's lethal injection procedures that executioners "did the worst thing they could do" during the botched killing of condemned inmate Angel Diaz last year. The testimony came from Mark Heath, a Columbia University anesthesiologist who has testified on the behalf of death row inmates in about 20 states. But despite such testimony, the key question of whether Diaz suffered pain during the execution remained murky. Heath said the execution team "did exactly 100 percent the wrong thing" during the Dec. 13 execution of Diaz, who was condemned for the 1979 shooting death of a Miami topless club manager. Plastic needles threaded into Diaz's arms tore through his veins, splashing chemicals into his flesh. Because the chemical didn't go directly to Diaz's brain and heart, he took 34 minutes to die - about twice as long as usual. An autopsy the next day showed Diaz suffered footlong chemical blisters on both of his arms. Florida's execution procedures call for a three-drug cocktail: a sedative, a drug that causes paralysis and a drug that causes a fatal heart attack. The executioner testified last week that he released the sedative into Diaz, then couldn't get the paralytic drug to flow into Diaz's vein. The doctor who performed the autopsy said Diaz's veins likely tore right away, so none of the sedative likely made it to his brain quickly. "None of the materials injected went to the right place," Medical Examiner William Hamilton testified Monday. "Was he feeling anything? I don't know." A medical member of the execution team then decided to release the third drug, which causes a severe burning pain, into Diaz's other arm. This move baffled Heath because the painful third drug likely was injected into Diaz's body without the benefit of the sedative. The vein in the second arm also broke, perhaps preventing Diaz from suffering severe burning pain from the third drug, Heath said. "Thank God the other IV wasn't working either," Heath said. "The people doing this could not have thought through the contingencies." Heath said witness accounts that Diaz was breathing "like a fish out of water" lead him to believe the drug causing a painful feeling of paralysis took effect before the painkiller. "That is a classic sign - that fish-out-of-water look - that the person is partially paralyzed and struggling for breath," Heath said. He added, "Mr Diaz, in my opinion, was not properly anesthetized." The drugs eventually were absorbed from Diaz's flesh into his bloodstream, but at a very slow rate. It's unknown just how fast each drug was absorbed because nobody has tested how rapidly those drugs are absorbed through human tissue. State officials who participated in the execution have testified that they saw no evidence of pain, in contrast to press witnesses whose published accounts told of Diaz grimacing, squinting and coughing. A capital defense attorney who witnessed the execution also said Diaz appeared to be in pain. Whether Diaz felt pain is important because the U.S. Constitution forbids the government from exposing any prisoner to cruel and unusual punishment. Blood samples taken during and immediately after the execution could indicate if an inmate experienced pain. But in most cases, including with Diaz, blood samples aren't taken until an autopsy the next day. By this time the drug levels have broken down. Heath told the panel that if it wants to carry out executions by lethal injection, it should have doctors at the inmate's gurney to troubleshoot any problems. That creates a Catch-22 for the state because medical associations forbid doctors from participating in executions. The panel was formed by then-Gov. Jeb Bush after Diaz's death, and no other executions have been scheduled. The panel is expected to meet again Monday in Tampa, at which point it may hear from a doctor who has testified on behalf of state governments that use lethal injection procedures similar to Florida's.
[Last modified February 13, 2007, 05:55:17]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Drew
|
02/14/07 02:19 AM
|
|
Oh yeah, let's feel sorry for the muderers - did this guy's victims "enjoy" a painless death? Bring back the electric chair - no - better yet, get an "electic couch" and juice 3 or 4 at the same time. The bullet idea is not bad either.
|
|
by Nancy
|
02/13/07 11:39 PM
|
|
Did Diaz's victim feel pain? Was Diaz careful to make sure his murder was quick and painless?
|
|
by Steve
|
02/13/07 10:18 PM
|
|
The state didn't do everything wrong. "the painful third drug likely was injected into Diaz's body..." Direct pain!!! The first two couldn't get it done? or is the third one ment to cause Pain? HOPE SO! BRING BACK SPARKY!!!!Beheadings are painless!
|
|
by Ann
|
02/13/07 09:05 PM
|
|
Whether you believe in the death penalty or not ....two wrongs don't make it right. Maybe you should have a firing squad down there if you can't do the lethal injection right.
|
|
by Jennifer
|
02/13/07 06:30 PM
|
|
Bring back the gas chamber. If it was good enough for the Nazi's it should be good enough for us, right?
|
|
by Tim
|
02/13/07 05:34 PM
|
|
If the state wanted this guy to suffer while he was paying for his crime with his life, the state should have put that into the law. If you're going to be barbaric, at least do it openly. Is Florida as grisly and vicious as it's criminals?
|
|
by Ernie
|
02/13/07 04:03 PM
|
|
We should think of the family he destroyed when he committed the crime. What rights did this killer give his victim. did he care his victim was in pain or maybe criminals should consult the state
|
|
by Andrew
|
02/13/07 02:58 PM
|
|
Eye for an eye i say.....go back to when the indians tied them up in the desert or dripped honey on them and let the ants eat them. The more pain the better.
|
|
by Kathryn
|
02/13/07 02:42 PM
|
|
That is really too bad. I am concerned regarding the feelings of his victim.
|
|
by Tanya
|
02/13/07 02:15 PM
|
|
EYE FOR AN EYE
|
|
by lou
|
02/13/07 01:40 PM
|
|
i think you should pull his finger and toe nails off first ,then give them a bullett ,they sure didnt care what the person he killed felt,and dont forget the ongoing pain that the victims family endures because of criminal actions...
|
|
by MiMi
|
02/13/07 01:37 PM
|
|
In December we put our beloved dog down.He took care of our family for 16 years.He was feeble and very crippled>The vet put the needle in his leg.Less than 60 min. later Casey was dead.Quickly.Why is executing a person so complicated?
|
|
by Gilbert
|
02/13/07 01:25 PM
|
|
Funny that all of this furor is about a person who committed the ultimate sin. The victims family should be consulted, as appose to these so-called experts! They can most assuredly relate to suffering! Don't you think so? They are the experts.
|
|
by Rick
|
02/13/07 01:03 PM
|
|
This is supposed to be JUSTICE not VENGEANCE. This person was in the care of the state, regardless of his crime, and deserved humane treatment. An eye for an eye will leave us all blind eventually. Our Govt already murders enough people to stay safe?
|
|
by jennifer
|
02/13/07 12:41 PM
|
|
there is only one man who sits high and can judge...thy shall not kill, so none is in a better situation, not the murderer or the state of florida..they will all have to answer on judgement day. so judge not
|
|
by Brandi
|
02/13/07 12:00 PM
|
|
Do we really need to spend more money trying to figure out if the convicted have rights? Who will give the dead and loved ones their rights?
|
|
by rose
|
02/13/07 11:52 AM
|
|
i have no feelings for someone who intentionally kills some one and thens is expected to die painlessly that is not fair to the families this person affected by taking away a loved one. the less killers on the street the better this world will be.
|
|
by Landerick
|
02/13/07 11:36 AM
|
|
Who are we to judge? We all make mistakes. This guy made a big mistake and should have rotted in prison. We should leave the Judgment to God. If we don't then we are just like him...A Murderer. A life for a life is ridiculous!
|
|
by Jerry
|
02/13/07 11:12 AM
|
|
To hell with the constitution, lets put it through a shredder! What were those forefathers thinking of when they forbade cruel and unusual punishment?
oh wait, I forgot - they were trying to be good christians and decent human beings.
|
|
by Whitney
|
02/13/07 10:53 AM
|
|
Humm, Did he feel pain? Sure hope so!
|
|
by Curt
|
02/13/07 10:49 AM
|
|
See the deal is they do not do enough of them so they are rusty at it. If the sob's did not stay on death row for 20 plus years the people doing it could get it right.
I am glad he had pain... now I bet the next guy in line is thinking crap.
|
|
by Dale
|
02/13/07 10:42 AM
|
|
Heath said the execution team "did exactly 100 percent the wrong thing"
Who is this "Heath Bar"... Hey Heath Hello! he's dead...so at best its only "99 percent" wrong anyway. If you want a cause...how about our soldiers in Irag and their suffering.
|
|
by Diane
|
02/13/07 10:35 AM
|
|
Ya know, a gunshot to the head or a beheadding would have been much less painful! They can put a cat or dog to sleep in seconds with no pain and none of this BS, so why son't we just use the vet's method? Anyone know the answer to that?
|
|
by Gloria
|
02/13/07 10:33 AM
|
|
I don't think it should matter if he suffered a little when he died, just think of the people or persons he was convicted of killing; he didn't care about the pain he inflicted on them! I believe it was poetic justice at its finest!
|
|
by Tracy
|
02/13/07 10:14 AM
|
|
I'm glad I'm not the only one who could care less whether this person felt pain.
|
|
by Tim
|
02/13/07 10:08 AM
|
|
A bullet in the head would be a lot simpler and cheaper!
|
|
by James
|
02/13/07 09:15 AM
|
|
Well, that is just too bad. Always about what the criminal felt. I wonder what the man he shot felt? I bet he didnt get a sedative first. Get over it people! Quit putting criminals first and start thinking about what got them convicted.
|
|
by katz
|
02/13/07 08:56 AM
|
|
He murdered a person in 1979 for heaven's sake. Does it really matter if he suffered when he died? He lived 27 years longer than the person he had no mercy for.......
|
|
by John
|
02/13/07 08:20 AM
|
|
I don't believe they deserve any special exclusion from pain or suffering. I am a little bit old school, a pain for a pain, a suffering for a suffering. Hang 'em High. Cruel and unusual is having to live with these idiots.
|
|
by kris
|
02/13/07 08:11 AM
|
|
and I'm supposed to feel sorry for this man?
|
|
by Reality
|
02/13/07 08:04 AM
|
|
Yes lets make sure that the murders and rapists have a painless death. They are such upstanding citizens. What the heck is wrong with theses people! A bullet costs .75 and to the head would cause no pain, would be immediate and would not require a Dr
|
|
by stephanie
|
02/13/07 08:03 AM
|
|
I have to admit I am not a person who wants people to suffer but here you have a convicted murderer, and we are arguing if he felt any pain? Really do you think he said to his self gee I wonder if this person i just murdered felt any pain. Think!!!
|
|
by JOE
|
02/13/07 07:37 AM
|
|
IF THEY FEEL PAIN SO BE IT. IF DOCTORS DON'T WANT TO PERFORM THE JOB, THEN JUST LET ANYONE DO IT. I HAVE NO MERCY FOR THE JACKEL WHO IS GOING TO DIE.
|
|