Fill out this form to email this article to a friend
Politics
Insurers file suit against new rule
By JENNIFER LIBERTO
Published February 14, 2007
TALLAHASSEE - A group of insurance companies has gone to court to reclaim their right to cancel homeowners policies, which the Florida Cabinet suspended two weeks ago. The Florida Insurance Council, representing major insurance companies such as Allstate and Nationwide, filed a pair of legal challenges this week asking judges in separate venues to throw out the emergency rule that prevents insurance companies from dropping homeowners policies for much of 2007. The industry group says the Florida Cabinet stretched beyond its authority in approving an emergency rule that "takes steps that are nowhere contemplated by the legislation" passed during the January special session on insurance, according to an injunction filed Monday in the 1st District Court of Appeal in Tallahassee. The group filed a second challenge on Tuesday with the Division of Administrative Hearings. The emergency rule forbids insurance companies from raising rates or dropping policies, effective Jan. 31. At the time, Gov. Charlie Crist said the purpose was to prevent companies from rushing to cancel policies or seek higher rates before a new law governing the insurance industry could take effect. The insurance group argues that the Cabinet didn't have the authority to restrict policy cancellations, and also argues that the emergency rule was considered too hastily to give insurance companies a fair chance to make a case against it. "The main concern is that the rule can result in unintended consequences that might hurt consumers, and the simple lack of due process with the granting of the emergency rule," said George Grawe, Allstate's general counsel. The emergency rule has prevented Allstate from following through on its plan to cancel more than 100,000 policies, which would have been transferred to Royal Palm Insurance Co. The insurance group's legal challenges won't impact homeowners policies - yet. The group wants to invalidate the rule, which would open the door to drop policies. Crist said Tuesday he was not surprised by the legal fight. "They can't win in the Legislature any more, they can't win in the Cabinet any more, so they're going to try the court system," Crist said. The entire Cabinet voted with Crist on the emergency measure, but both CFO Alex Sink and Agriculture Commissioner Charles Bronson said they had reservations. Sink questioned why more advanced notice wasn't given, since the rule was publicized only the night before the Cabinet meeting. In the past, emergency rules have been released the Friday before Tuesday Cabinet meetings, said Tara Klimek, Sink's spokeswoman. Exactly how long the moratorium will last is somewhat unclear. The emergency rule says policies can't be dropped until formal rate requests are filed in March, after the first elements of the new law are in effect. But insurance companies say the practical effect is that they would be forbidden from dropping policies for most of 2007. The part that really irks insurers, and which is featured prominently in their legal challenge, is a followup "clarification" letter that Commissioner Kevin McCarty wrote on Feb. 9. In addition to preventing new policies from being canceled, the Office of Insurance Regulation said that it will also stop insurers from canceling policies for which it had given notice months earlier. Under the interpretation, insurers who in early November told policyholders they would be dropped effective Jan. 31 or after cannot cancel those policies. For example, the governor's parents, who received a January notice from Tower Hill Insurance Group that their homeowners policy would be dropped, are now among those protected for most of 2007. In recent weeks, insurance companies have been sending letters to those customers telling them they would be renewed rather than canceled. Florida Insurance Council members say the agency's interpretation goes beyond what the Legislature intended. "This procedure violates the separation of powers protection in the Florida Constitution and deprives insurers of their right to only have the Florida Legislature enact legislation," the lawsuit stated. Commissioner McCarty disagrees. "We think it's essential to further the goals and objectives of the Florida Legislature when they enacted House Bill 1A," he said. The Florida Insurance Council doesn't represent the two largest property insurance providers in Florida: State Farm, the largest private insurance company, or Citizens Property Insurance Corp., the state-run company. The emergency rule hasn't affected Citizens or State Farm, spokesmen for both companies said.
[Last modified February 13, 2007, 23:59:00]
Share your thoughts on this story
Comments on this article
|
by Rob
|
11/21/07 11:12 PM
|
|
So what about the rate rollbacks that were "supposed" to happen? My guess is that really means instead of another pending 100% increase, we will be seing a 70% increase (30% reduction of what was to occur)????
|
|
by Rob
|
03/28/07 09:24 PM
|
|
Idiots! You just now come out and tell us who were told in Nov that our insurance would not be dropped on 31 January??? I was one of them who after exhaustive search, decided to go with Royal Palm (100% Increase) after I was dropped by Allstate.
|
|
by Mark
|
03/05/07 06:00 PM
|
|
I own a home in Florida and live in NC. I would like to know when somebody will notify me a what is going on. I have been cancelled by my insurance and havent got a clue what is going on
|
|
by Dani
|
02/15/07 08:47 PM
|
|
I have a question for you bunch of geniuses. Citizens was required BY LAW to have the highest rates. Yet after 04/05 storms they are now 1 billion dollars buried.If they couldn't make it, how are companies charging less making so much $? Hmmm????
|
|
by Dani
|
02/15/07 08:42 PM
|
|
Here's what I'd like you bunch of geniuses to explain to me.Citizens by law had to charge the highest rates in the state. After the 04/05 seasons, they are now
|
|
by tom
|
02/15/07 09:20 AM
|
|
There are hundreds perhaps thousands of pending appeals awaiting hearinds in this state. Yet big money (insurance) files and is heard immediatly by the courts. What is wrong with this system ? They should take a number and wait as the citizens do.
|
|
by Broke in Pasco
|
02/14/07 10:25 PM
|
|
It is about time we stand up to the insurance companys that conspire together to send rates out of sight. I think they would have lowered the rates enventually, but only after they run out pockets to stuff the cash in. Same principles as oil comp.
|
|
by Lee
|
02/14/07 10:17 PM
|
|
Citizens will be the only Co left. B.S. like this buys votes not stability. There are people in the FL that need help: retirees, and those on fixed incomes, not mil homes on the coast. Save your $. If theres a storm assesments coud mean $600 per pol
|
|
by Highlander
|
02/14/07 05:56 PM
|
|
I can understand needing to increase rates. But the INSCos sneer at those of us who have chosen our homes to be > 50 ft above SL; Reinforced roofs& garage doors etc. I agree-just make Citizens available& non-profit.
|
|
by Tom
|
02/14/07 05:51 PM
|
|
There certainly is always a proper point for government to intervene for the public good. The last 14 years have shown that the ins industry needs shepherding.
|
|
by Claude
|
02/14/07 05:49 PM
|
|
Rong Frank- der is laws alreddy dey cant kancel policies during hurrycane seasoning. REGULATIONS DO WORK-seealso airline, bank, SEC. If you don'like regalations-toobadd goto Mayhickso
|
|
by George
|
02/14/07 05:05 PM
|
|
Would the "POOR" Insurance Companies like some cheese & crackers with their "Whine"?
|
|
by mikem
|
02/14/07 04:34 PM
|
|
just let citizens sell all types of insurance at lower rates let the state make all the money . once we have a enough money lower the rate more. make it none profit.WE COULD SURE USE THE MONEY!
|
|
by Diane
|
02/14/07 03:40 PM
|
|
Spring Warrior: I just read that now State Farm won't write new home or commercial policies in your state. soon ins. companies will only insure 10 out of all the states; the rest will be left to fend for themselves. They want all profit, zero loss
|
|
by RiverBill
|
02/14/07 03:31 PM
|
|
When the State of Florida and the Federal Govt. decide to stop subsidizing rich people's 2nd homes on Gulf Barrier Islands insurance rates will become more reasonable for the rest of us. Just a thought.
|
|
by SpringWarrior
|
02/14/07 03:12 PM
|
|
I am sorry to be the one to say this but in the end free market economics will prevail in a capitalist economy. The market will continue to work as it has in the past. I live in Biloxi. When you get a 32 ft. surge across St. Pete Bch we'll talk again
|
|
by John
|
02/14/07 02:41 PM
|
|
Why fight the rule - unless your plan was to cut policies and raise rates before the law took effect? The Insurance Industry is showing their true colors yet again. Criminals and thieves - every member of this corrupt industry - criminals and thieves
|
|
by Frank
|
02/14/07 02:29 PM
|
|
Ins Cos have every right to cancel any policy. Its a business decision
|
|
by Diane
|
02/14/07 02:23 PM
|
|
HAHAHAHA! Poor little insurance companies, crying because they can't screw the consumers even more. They're just mad they didn't have time to give the people one last whammy before the moratorium took effect.
|
|
by Melinda
|
02/14/07 12:57 PM
|
|
Dear Charlie Crist: 'They' can and HAVE won in the legislature. They won when you decided to have the taxpayers insure the insurance companies so that the CEO's and exec's outrageous paychecks are not at risk.
|
|
by theresa
|
02/14/07 12:52 PM
|
|
thanks for attempting to protect the public. what is fair is fair. thanks
|
|
by FiremanBob
|
02/14/07 10:42 AM
|
|
Maybe we should roll back the insurance companies right to raise rates before getting approval.
|
|
by Noone
|
02/14/07 10:14 AM
|
|
Let's have a big pity party for the insurance companies, NOT! They've been bending us over like this for years and now that the state is doing something about it they cry foul. How long did they think we'd stand for this before we took action!
|
|
by Gene
|
02/14/07 09:59 AM
|
|
A license to sell insurance in Florida should contain the proviso, should any type of insurance be cancelled by the carrier, they lose the license to sell any insurance within the state.
|
|
by David
|
02/14/07 09:49 AM
|
|
So much for trying to be nice. Time to write some Anti-trust laws of our own and remove the insurance industry's access to writing legislation, Their big money has caused way too much harm.
|
|
by Reggie
|
02/14/07 09:33 AM
|
|
The Peoples governor did what was right and necessary for Florida home owners. The private insures got everything they wanted from the prvious governor and legislators but there is a new boss. The Courts will rule against the private insures.
|
|
by Tomas Cruz
|
02/14/07 09:02 AM
|
|
If we can only have homeoweners insurance when the insurers are making money and there is no storms, neither losses, then I ask, WHY DO WE NEED INSURANCE?, if things go bad they will cancel it anyway.
|
|
by Fred
|
02/14/07 06:10 AM
|
|
The right to a hearing is afforded ins. co.-the cost-benefit test was followed and there is no loss of "property" by ins.co. Legislature can give auth. to agency to implement quickly its intended goal-public protection. Agency'Actions are apporpriate
|
|